Skip to main content

Issues in Tool Qualification for Safety-Critical Hardware: What Formal Approaches Can and Cannot Do

  • Conference paper
Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security (SAFECOMP 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 5775))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1667 Accesses

Abstract

Technology has improved to the point that system designers have the ability to trade-off implementing complex functions in either hardware or software. However, clear distinctions exist in the design tools. This paper examines what is unique to hardware design, areas where formal methods can be applied to advantage in hardware design and how errors can exist in the hardware even if formal methods are used to prove the design is correct.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Pampagnin, P., Menis, J.F.: DO254-ED80 for High Performance and High Reliable Electronic Components, Internal Paper, Barco-Siles S.A., Peynier, France (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bernardo, M., Cimatti, A. (eds.): SFM 2006. LNCS, vol. 3965. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kern, C., Greenstreet, M.R.: Formal Verification in Hardware Design: A Survey. ACM Trans. on Design Automation of Electronic Systems 4(2), 123–193 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Turner, K.J., He, J.: Formally-based Design Evaluation. In: Margaria, T., Melham, T.F. (eds.) CHARME 2001. LNCS, vol. 2144, pp. 104–109. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Aljer, A., Devienne, P.: Co-design and Refinement for Safety Critical Systems. In: Proc. DFT 2004, 19th IEEE International Symposium on Defect and Fault Tolerance in VLSI Systems, pp. 78–86. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Nehme, C., Lundqvist, K.: A Tool for Translating VHDL to Finite State Machines. In: Proc. DACS 2003, 22nd Digital Avionics Systems Conference, October 12-16, vol. 1, pp. 3.B.6-1-7 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dajani-Brown, S., Cofer, D., Bouali, A.: Formal Verification of an Avionics Sensor Voter Using SCADE. In: Lakhnech, Y., Yovine, S. (eds.) FORMATS 2004 and FTRTFT 2004. LNCS, vol. 3253, pp. 5–20. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Hilton, A.J.: High-Integrity Hardware-Software Codesign, Ph.D. Thesis, The Open University (April 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. DO-254, Design Assurance Guidance for Airborne Electronic Hardware, RTCA Inc., Washington, DC (April 19, 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dellacherie, S., Burgaud, L., di Crescenzo, P.: imPROVE–HDL: A DO-254 Formal Property Checker Used for Design and Verification of Avionics Protocol Controllers. In: Proc. DACS 2003, 22nd Digital Avionics Systems Conference, Indianapolis, Ind., October 12-16, vol. 1, pp. 1.A.1-1.1-8 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Karlsson, K., Forsberg, H.: Emerging Verification Methods for Complex Hardware in Avionics. In: Proc. DASC 2005, 24th Digital Avionics Systems Conference, October 30 -November 3, vol. 1, pp. 6.B.1 - 61-12 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Henson, J.: Equivalence Checking for FPGA Design, White Paper, Mentor Graphics Corp., Wilsonville, Ore. (May 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. IEEE Std 1076-2002, Standard VHDL Language Reference Manual, The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bridgford, B., Carmichael, C., Tseng, C.W.: Single-Event Upset Mitigation Selection Guide, Application Note XAPP987, Xilinx Inc., San Jose, Calif. (March 2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Butka, B., Zalewski, J., Kornecki, A.J. (2009). Issues in Tool Qualification for Safety-Critical Hardware: What Formal Approaches Can and Cannot Do. In: Buth, B., Rabe, G., Seyfarth, T. (eds) Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security. SAFECOMP 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5775. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04468-7_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04468-7_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04467-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04468-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics