Advertisement

A Domain-Specific Framework for Automated Construction and Verification of Railway Control Systems

(Extended Abstract)
  • Anne E. Haxthausen
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5775)

Abstract

The development of modern railway and tramway control systems represents a considerable challenge to both systems and software engineers: The goal to increase the traffic throughput while at the same time increasing the availability and reliability of railway operations leads to a demand for more elaborate safety mechanisms in order to keep the risk at the same low level that has been established for European railways until today. The challenge is further increased by the demand for shorter time-to-market periods and higher competition among suppliers of the railway domain; both factors resulting in a demand for a higher degree of automation for the development verification, validation and test phases of projects, without impairing the thoroughness of safety-related quality measures and certification activities. Motivated by these considerations, this presentation describes an approach for automated construction and verification of railway control systems.

Keywords

Model Check Object Code Bound Model Check Automate Construction State Space Explosion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bjørner, D.: New Results and Current Trends in Formal Techniques for the Development of Software for Transportation Systems. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Formal Methods for Railway Operation and Control Systems (FORMS 2003), Budapest, Hungary, May 15-16 (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ehrig, H., Damm, W., Desel, J., Große-Rhode, M., Reif, W., Schnieder, E., Westkämper, E. (eds.): INT 2004. LNCS, vol. 3147, pp. 1–8. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization. EN 50128 – Railway applications – Communications, signalling and processing systems – Software for railway control and protection systems. CENELEC, Brussels (2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Haxthausen, A.E., Peleska, J.: A Domain-Oriented, Model-Based Approach for Construction and Verification of Railway Control Systems. In: Jones, C.B., Liu, Z., Woodcock, J. (eds.) Formal Methods and Hybrid Real-Time Systems. LNCS, vol. 4700, pp. 320–348. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schnieder, E., Tarnai, G. (eds.): Proceedings of Formal Methods for Automation and Safety in Railway and Automotive Systems (FORMS/FORMAT 2004), Braunschweig, Germany. Technical University of Braunschweig (December 2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schnieder, E., Tarnai, G. (eds.): Proceedings of Formal Methods for Automation and Safety in Railway and Automotive Systems (FORMS/FORMAT 2007), Braunschweig, Germany. GZVB e.V (2007) ISBN 13:978-3-937655-09-3Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anne E. Haxthausen
    • 1
  1. 1.Informatics and Mathematical ModellingTechnical University of DenmarkLyngbyDenmark

Personalised recommendations