Advertisement

Visual Affinity Propagation Improves Sub-topics Diversity without Loss of Precision in Web Photo Retrieval

  • Hervé Glotin
  • Zhong-Qiu Zhao
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5706)

Abstract

This paper demonstrates that Affinity Propagation (AP) outperforms Kmeans for sub-topic clustering of web image retrieval. A SVM visual images retrieval system is built, and then clustering is performed on the results of each topic. Then we heighten the diversity of the 20 top results, by moving into the top the image with the lowest rank in each cluster. Using 45 dimensions Profile Entropy visual Features, we show for the 39 topics of the imageCLEF08 web image retrieval clustering campaign on 20K IAPR images, that the Cluster-Recall (CR) after AP is 13% better than the baseline without clustering, while the Precision stays almost the same. Moreover, CR and Precision without clustering are altered by Kmeans. We finally discuss that some high-level topics require text information for good CR, and that more discriminant visual features would also allow Precision enhancement after AP.

Keywords

Web Image Retrieval Diversity Clustering Profile Entropy Features Affinity Propagation XML SVM 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Glotin, H.: Robust Information Retrieval and Perception for a Scaled Lego-Audio-Video Multi-structuration. Pr. Habilitation Thesis, Univ. Toulon (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Glotin, Zhao: LSIS TREC VIDEO 2008 High Level Feature Shot Segmentation using Compact Profil Entropy. In: NIST TRECVIDEO 2008 notebook (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tollari, Glotin: Learning Optimal Visual Features from Web Sampling in Online Image Retrieval. In: IEEE Conf. Acoustics Speech Signal Image Proc. (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Glotin, Zhao: LSIS Imageclef Photo: combining text with entropic pixel features for texto-visual photo retrieval. CLEF keynotes (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Thomas, A., Paul, C., Mark, S., Michael, G.: Overview of the ImageCLEFphoto 2008 Photo Retrieval Task Eval. Systems for Multilingual and Multimodal Information Access. In: 9th Wkp of the Cross-Language Eval. (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Grubinger, Clough, Muller, Deselaers: The IAPR TC-12 benchmark: A new evaluation resource for visual information systems. In: Proc. OntoImage Language Resources for Content-Based Image Retrieval Wkp, with LREC (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Frey, B., Dueck, D.: Clustering by Passing Messages Between Data Points. Science 315, 972–976 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mulhem, et al.: LIG working notes on ImageCLEFphoto. CLEF keynotes (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tollari, S., Mulhem, P., Ferecatu, M., Glotin, H., Detyniecki, M., Gallinari, P., Sahbi, H., Zhao, Z.-Q.: A comparative study of diversity methods for different text and image retrieval approaches. In: Peters, C., et al. (eds.) CLEF 2008. LNCS, vol. 5706, pp. 585–592. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ferecatu, M., Sahbi, H.: Bi-Modal Text and Image Retrieval with Diversity Enhancement. CLEF keynotes (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hervé Glotin
    • 1
  • Zhong-Qiu Zhao
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Systems & Information Sciences Lab.UMR CNRS 6168, & Univ. Sud Toulon-VarFrance
  2. 2.Computer & Information SchoolHefei Univ. of TechnologyChina

Personalised recommendations