Abstract
Argumentation has been acknowledged as a powerful mechanism for automated decision making. In this context several recent works have studied the problem of accommodating preference information in argumentation. The majority of these studies rely on Dung’s abstract argumentation framework and its underlying acceptability semantics.
In this paper we show that Dung’s acceptability semantics, when applied to a preference-based argumentation framework for decision making purposes, may lead to counter intuitive results, as it does not take appropriately into account the preference information. To remedy this we propose a new acceptability semantics, called super-stable extension semantics, and present some of its properties. Moreover, we show that argumentation can be understood as a multiple criteria decision problem, making in this way results from decision theory applicable to argumentation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Kakas, A., Moraitis, P.: Argumentation based decision making for autonomous agents. In: Proc. 2nd International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agents systems, pp. 883–890 (2003)
Amgoud, L.: A general argumentation framework for inference and decision making. In: 21st Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, UAI 2005, pp. 26–33 (2005)
Amgoud, L., Dimopoulos, Y., Moraitis, P.: Making decisions through preference-based argumentation. In: Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, KR, pp. 113–123 (2008)
Bonet, B., Geffner, H.: Arguing for decisions: A qualitative model of decision making. In: Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 98–105 (1996)
Amgoud, L., Prade, H.: Explaining qualitative decision under uncertainty by argumentation. In: 21st National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2006, pp. 16–20 (2006)
Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence 77, 321–357 (1995)
Dimopoulos, Y., Moraitis, P., Amgoud, L.: Theoretical and Computational Properties of Preference-based Argumentation. In: Proc. of European Conference on AI, ECAI 2008 (2008)
Horty, J.: Argument construction and reinstatement in logics for defeasible reasoning. Artificial Intelligence and Law 9, 1–28 (2001)
Hinloopen, E., Nijkamp, P., Rietveld, P.: The regime method: A new multicriteria technique. In: Hansen, P. (ed.) Essays and Surveys on Multiple Criteria Decision Making, pp. 146–155. Springer, Heidelberg (1983)
Amgoud, L., Cayrol, C.: On the acceptability of arguments in preference-based argumentation framework. In: Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1–7 (1998)
Hansson, B.: Choice structures and preference relations. Synthése 18, 443–458 (1968)
Donaldson, D., Weymark, A.: A quasiordering is the intersection of orderings. Journal of Economic Theory 178, 382–387 (1998)
Bouyssou, D., Marchant, T., Pirlot, M., Perny, P., Tsoukias, A., Vincke, P.: Multicriteria Evaluation and Decision Models: stepping stones for the analyst. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Moffett, A., Sarkar, S.: Incorporating multiple criteria into the design of conservation area networks: A minireview with recommendations. Diversity and Distributions 12, 125–137 (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Dimopoulos, Y., Moraitis, P., Amgoud, L. (2009). Extending Argumentation to Make Good Decisions. In: Rossi, F., Tsoukias, A. (eds) Algorithmic Decision Theory. ADT 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5783. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04428-1_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04428-1_20
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04427-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04428-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)