Abstract
Retrieving relevant items as a response to a user query is the aim of each information retrieval system. But ‘without an understanding of what relevance means to users, it is difficult to imagine how a system can retrieve relevant information for users’ [1]. In this paper, we try to capture what relevance is for a particular user and model his profile implicitly considering his non declared preferences that are inferred from a ranking of a reduced set of retrieved documents that he produces. We propose an ordinal regression based model for interactive ranking which uses both the information given by this subjective ranking, as well as the multicriteria evaluation of these ranked documents, to adjust optimally the parameters of a ranking model. This model consists of a set of additive value functions which are built so as they are as compatible as possible with the subjective ranking. The preference information used in our model requires reasonable cognitive effort from the user.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Schamber, L., Eisenberg, M., Nilan, M.: A re-examination of relevance: Toward a dynamic, situational definition. IPM 26(6), 755–776 (1990)
Taylor, R.S.: Question-negotiation and information seeking in libraries. College and Research Libraries 29, 178–194 (1968)
Belkin, N.J., Kantor, P., Fox, E.A., Shaw, J.A.: Combining evidence of multiple query representations for information retrieval. IPM 31(3), 431–448 (1995)
Katzer, J., McGill, M., Tessier, J., Frakes, W., DasGupta, P.: A study of the overlap among document representations. Information Technology: Research and Development 1(4), 261–274 (1982)
Lee, J.H.: Combining multiple evidence from different properties of weighting schemes. In: SIGIR 1995, pp. 180–188 (1995)
Baeza-Yates, R.A., Ribeiro-Neto, B.A.: Modern Information Retrieval. ACM Press, New York (1999)
Saracevic, T.: Relevance reconsidered 1996. In: Information Science: Integration in Perspective, Proceedings of the CoLIS-2 conference. Royal School of Library and Information Science, Copenhagen, Denmark, pp. 201–218 (1996)
Farah, M., Vanderpooten, D.: An outranking approach for information retrieval. Information Retrieval 11(4), 315–334 (2008)
Ruthven, I., Lalmas, M.: A survey on the use of relevance feedback for information access systems. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 18(2), 95–145 (2003)
Manning, C.D., Raghavan, P., Schtze, H.: Relevance feedback and query expansion. In: Introduction to Information Retrieval. Cambridge University Press, New York (2008)
Rocchio, J.: Relevance feedback in information retrieval, pp. 313–323. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1971)
Roy, B.: Main sources of inaccurate determination, uncertainty and imprecision. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 12(10-11), 1245–1254 (1989)
Roy, B.: The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods. Theory and Decision 31, 49–73 (1991)
Vincke, P.: Multicriteria Decision-Aid. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester (1992)
Sawaragi, Y., Nakayama, H., Tanino, T.: Theory of Multiobjective Optimization, Orlando edn. Academic Press, London (1985)
Zionts, S., Wallenius, J.: An interactive programming method for solving the multiple criteria problem. Manage. Sci. 22(6), 652–663 (1976)
Benayoun, R., Laritchev, O., De Mongolfier, J., Tegny, J.: Linear programming with multiple objective functions: Step method (stem). Math. Program. 1(3), 366–375 (1971)
Jacquet-Lagrèze, E., Siskos, Y.: Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multicriteria decision making: the UTA method. European Journal of Operational Research 10, 151–164 (1982)
Jacquet-Lagrèze, E., Meziani, R., Slowinski, R.: Molp with an interactive assessment of a piecewise utility function. Eur. J. Oper. Res 31(3), 350–357 (1987)
Keeney, R., Raiffa, H.: Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value tradeoffs. J. Wiley, New York (1976)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Farah, M. (2009). Ordinal Regression Based Model for Personalized Information Retrieval. In: Azzopardi, L., et al. Advances in Information Retrieval Theory. ICTIR 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5766. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04417-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04417-5_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04416-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04417-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)