Skip to main content

An Implementation of Belief Change Operations Based on Probabilistic Conditional Logic

  • Conference paper
Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning (LPNMR 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5753))

  • 833 Accesses

Abstract

Probabilistic conditionals are a powerful means for expressing uncertain knowledge. In this paper, we describe a system implemented in Java performing probabilistic reasoning at optimum entropy. It provides nonmonotonic belief change operations like revision and update and supports advanced querying facilities including diagnosis and what-if-analysis.

The research reported here was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (grants BE 1700/7-1 and KE 1413/2-1).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Paris, J., Vencovska, A.: In defence of the maximum entropy inference process. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 17(1), 77–103 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Kern-Isberner, G.: Characterizing the principle of minimum cross-entropy within a conditional-logical framework. Artificial Intelligence 98, 169–208 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Shore, J.: Relative entropy, probabilistic inference and AI. In: Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 211–215. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1986)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Finthammer, M., Beierle, C., Berger, B., Kern-Isberner, G.: Probabilistic reasoning at optimum entropy with the MEcore system. In: Proceedings 22nd International FLAIRS Conference, FLAIRS 2009. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Berger, B.: Realisierung einer Komponente für die Revision probabilistischen Wissens. BSc Thesis, Dep. of Computer Science, FernUniversität Hagen (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Csiszár, I.: I-divergence geometry of probability distributions and minimization problems. Ann. Prob. 3, 146–158 (1975)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Rödder, W., Reucher, E., Kulmann, F.: Features of the expert-system-shell SPIRIT. Logic Journal of the IGPL 14(3), 483–500 (2006)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Teh, Y.W., Welling, M.: On improving the eciency of the iterative proportional fitting procedure. In: Proc. of the Ninth International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, Society for Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Finthammer, M., Beierle, C., Berger, B., Kern-Isberner, G. (2009). An Implementation of Belief Change Operations Based on Probabilistic Conditional Logic. In: Erdem, E., Lin, F., Schaub, T. (eds) Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning. LPNMR 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5753. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04238-6_48

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04238-6_48

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04237-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04238-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics