Skip to main content

How Flexible Is Answer Set Programming? An Experiment in Formalizing Commonsense in ASP

  • Conference paper
Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning (LPNMR 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5753))

  • 820 Accesses

Abstract

This paper describes an exercise in the formalization of commonsense with Answer Set Programming aimed at finding the answer to an interesting riddle, whose solution is not obvious to many people. Solving the riddle requires a considerable amount of commonsense knowledge and sophisticated knowledge representation and reasoning techniques, including planning and adversarial reasoning. Most importantly, the riddle is difficult enough to make it unclear, at first analysis, whether and how Answer Set Programming or other formalisms can be used to solve it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. McCarthy, J.: Programs with Common Sense. In: Proceedings of the Third Biannual World Automaton Congress, pp. 75–91 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mueller, E.T.: Commonsense Reasoning. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Marek, V.W., Truszczynski, M.: Stable models and an alternative logic programming paradigm. In: The Logic Programming Paradigm: a 25-Year Perspective, pp. 375–398. Springer, Berlin (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V.: Classical negation in logic programs and disjunctive databases. New Generation Computing, 365–385 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Balduccini, M., Gelfond, M.: Logic Programs with Consistency-Restoring Rules. In: Doherty, P., McCarthy, J., Williams, M.A. (eds.) International Symposium on Logical Formalization of Commonsense Reasoning, March 2003. AAAI 2003 Spring Symposium Series, pp. 9–18 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brewka, G., Niemela, I., Syrjanen, T.: Logic Programs with Ordered Disjunction 20(2), 335–357 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mellarkod, V.S., Gelfond, M., Zhang, Y.: Integrating Answer Set Programming and Constraint Logic Programming. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V.: Action Languages. Electronic Transactions on AI 3(16) (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gelfond, M.: Representing knowledge in A-prolog. In: Kakas, A.C., Sadri, F. (eds.) Computational Logic: Logic Programming and Beyond, Part II. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2408, pp. 413–451. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Hayes, P.J., McCarthy, J.: Some Philosophical Problems from the Standpoint of Artificial Intelligence. In: Meltzer, B., Michie, D. (eds.) Machine Intelligence 4, pp. 463–502. Edinburgh University Press (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sakama, C.: Induction from answer sets in nonmonotonic logic programs. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic 6(2), 203–231 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Balduccini, M.: Learning Action Descriptions with A-Prolog: Action Language C. In: Amir, E., Lifschitz, V., Miller, R. (eds.) Procs. of Logical Formalizations of Commonsense Reasoning, 2007 AAAI Spring Symposium (March 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Son, T.C., Sakama, C.: Negotiation Using Logic Programming with Consistency Restoring Rules. In: 2009 International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Balduccini, M. (2009). How Flexible Is Answer Set Programming? An Experiment in Formalizing Commonsense in ASP . In: Erdem, E., Lin, F., Schaub, T. (eds) Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning. LPNMR 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5753. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04238-6_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04238-6_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04237-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04238-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics