Skip to main content

On Reductive Semantics of Aggregates in Answer Set Programming

  • Conference paper
Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning (LPNMR 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5753))

Abstract

Several proposals of the semantics of aggregates are based on different extensions of the stable model semantics, which makes it difficult to compare them. In this note, building upon a reductive approach to designing aggregates, we provide reformulations of some existing semantics in terms of propositional formulas, which help us compare the semantics and understand their properties in terms of their propositional formula representations. We also present a generalization of semantics of aggregates without involving grounding, and define loop formulas for programs with aggregates guided by the reductive approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Lifschitz, V., Tang, L.R., Turner, H.: Nested expressions in logic programs. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 25, 369–389 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Faber, W., Leone, N., Pfeifer, G.: Recursive aggregates in disjunctive logic programs: Semantics and complexity. In: Alferes, J.J., Leite, J. (eds.) JELIA 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3229, pp. 200–212. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Son, T.C., Pontelli, E., Tu, P.H.: Answer sets for logic programs with arbitrary abstract constraint atoms. J. Artif. Intell. Res. (JAIR) 29, 353–389 (2007)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Pelov, N., Denecker, M., Bruynooghe, M.: Translation of aggregate programs to normal logic programs. In: Proc. Answer Set Programming (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Son, T.C., Pontelli, E.: A constructive semantic characterization of aggregates in answer set programming. TPLP 7(3), 355–375 (2007)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Ferraris, P.: Answer sets for propositional theories. In: Baral, C., Greco, G., Leone, N., Terracina, G. (eds.) LPNMR 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3662, pp. 119–131. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Pearce, D.: A new logical characterization of stable models and answer sets. In: Dix, J., Pereira, L., Przymusinski, T. (eds.) NMELP 1996. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1216, pp. 57–70. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Ferraris, P., Lee, J., Lifschitz, V.: A new perspective on stable models. In: Proc. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pp. 372–379 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ferraris, P., Lee, J., Lifschitz, V.: A generalization of the Lin-Zhao theorem. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 47, 79–101 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V.: The stable model semantics for logic programming. In: Kowalski, R., Bowen, K. (eds.) Proceedings of International Logic Programming Conference and Symposium, pp. 1070–1080. MIT Press, Cambridge (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lifschitz, V., Pearce, D., Valverde, A.: Strongly equivalent logic programs. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic 2, 526–541 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee, J., Meng, Y.: On loop formulas with variables. In: Proc. International Conference on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR), pp. 444–453 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Liu, L., Truszczynski, M.: Properties and applications of programs with monotone and convex constraints. J. Artif. Intell. Res. (JAIR) 27, 299–334 (2006)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Faber, W.: Unfounded sets for disjunctive logic programs with arbitrary aggregates. In: Baral, C., Greco, G., Leone, N., Terracina, G. (eds.) LPNMR 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3662, pp. 40–52. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. You, J.H., Liu, G.: Loop formulas for logic programs with arbitrary constraint atoms. In: Proc. AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), pp. 584–589 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lee, J., Lifschitz, V., Palla, R.: A reductive semantics for counting and choice in answer set programming. In: Proc. AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), pp. 472–479 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lee, J., Meng, Y. (2009). On Reductive Semantics of Aggregates in Answer Set Programming. In: Erdem, E., Lin, F., Schaub, T. (eds) Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning. LPNMR 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5753. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04238-6_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04238-6_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04237-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04238-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics