Skip to main content

An OWL Ontology for Fuzzy OWL 2

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5722))

Abstract

The need to deal with vague information in Semantic Web languages is rising in importance and, thus, calls for a standard way to represent such information. We may address this issue by either extending current Semantic Web languages to cope with vagueness, or by providing an ontology describing how to represent such information within Semantic Web languages. In this work, we follow the latter approach and propose and discuss an OWL ontology to represent important features of fuzzy OWL 2 statements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Blanco, I.J., Vila, M.A., Martínez-Cruz, C.: The use of ontologies for representing database schemas of fuzzy information. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 23(4), 419–445 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bobillo, F.: Managing vagueness in ontologies. PhD thesis, University of Granada, Spain (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bobillo, F., Delgado, M., Gómez-Romero, J.: A crisp representation for fuzzy SHOIN with fuzzy nominals and general concept inclusions. In: da Costa, P.C.G., d’Amato, C., Fanizzi, N., Laskey, K.B., Laskey, K.J., Lukasiewicz, T., Nickles, M., Pool, M. (eds.) URSW 2005 - 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5327, pp. 174–188. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bobillo, F., Delgado, M., Gómez-Romero, J.: DeLorean: A reasoner for fuzzy OWL 1.1. In: Proc. of the 4th International Workshop on Uncertainty Reasoning for the Semantic Web (URSW 2008). CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 423 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bobillo, F., Delgado, M., Gómez-Romero, J.: Optimizing the crisp representation of the fuzzy description logic SROIQ. In: da Costa, P.C.G., d’Amato, C., Fanizzi, N., Laskey, K.B., Laskey, K.J., Lukasiewicz, T., Nickles, M., Pool, M. (eds.) URSW 2005 - 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5327, pp. 189–206. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bobillo, F., Delgado, M., Gómez-Romero, J.: Crisp representations and reasoning for fuzzy ontologies. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems 17(4) (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bobillo, F., Delgado, M., Gómez-Romero, J., Straccia, U.: Fuzzy Description Logics under Gödel semantics. Int. J of Approximate Reasoning 50(3), 494–514 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Bobillo, F., Straccia, U.: fuzzyDL: An expressive fuzzy Description Logic reasoner. In: Proceedings of the 17th IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE 2008), pp. 923–930. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bobillo, F., Straccia, U.: Towards a crisp representation of fuzzy Description Logics under Łukasiewicz semantics. In: An, A., Matwin, S., Raś, Z.W., Ślęzak, D. (eds.) Foundations of Intelligent Systems. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4994, pp. 309–318. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Cuenca-Grau, B., Horrocks, I., Motik, B., Parsia, B., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Sattler, U.: OWL 2: The next step for OWL. Journal of Web Semantics 6(4), 309–322 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gao, M., Liu, C.: Extending OWL by fuzzy Description Logic. In: Proceedings of the 17th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI 2005), pp. 562–567. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Klinov, P., Parsia, B.: Optimization and evaluation of reasoning in probabilistic description logic: Towards a systematic approach. In: Sheth, A.P., Staab, S., Dean, M., Paolucci, M., Maynard, D., Finin, T., Thirunarayan, K. (eds.) ISWC 2008. LNCS, vol. 5318, pp. 213–228. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Hájek, P.: Metamathematics of Fuzzy Logic. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1998)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Horridge, M., Bechhofer, S., Noppens, O.: Igniting the OWL 1.1 touch paper: The OWL API. In: Proc. of the 3rd International Workshop on OWL: Experiences and Directions (OWLED 2007). CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 258 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lukasiewicz, T., Straccia, U.: Managing uncertainty and vagueness in Description Logics for the Semantic Web. Journal of Web Semantics 6(4), 291–308 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Stoilos, G., Simou, N., Stamou, G., Kollias, S.: Uncertainty and the Semantic Web. IEEE Intelligent Systems 21(5), 84–87 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Stoilos, G., Stamou, G.: Extending fuzzy Description Logics for the Semantic Web. In: Proc. of the 3rd International Workshop on OWL: Experience and Directions (OWLED 2007). CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 258 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stoilos, G., Stamou, G., Tzouvaras, V., Pan, J.Z., Horrocks, I.: Fuzzy OWL: Uncertainty and the Semantic Web. In: Proc. of the Workshop on OWL: Experience and Directions (OWLED 2005). CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 188 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Straccia, U.: Transforming fuzzy Description Logics into classical description logics. In: Alferes, J.J., Leite, J. (eds.) JELIA 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3229, pp. 385–399. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Straccia, U.: Description Logics with fuzzy concrete domains. In: Proceedings of the 21st Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, UAI 2005 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Straccia, U.: A fuzzy Description Logic for the Semantic Web. In: Sanchez, E. (ed.) Fuzzy Logic and the Semantic Web. Capturing Intelligence, vol. 1, pp. 73–90. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Vacura, M., Svátek, V., Smrž, P.: A pattern-based framework for representation of uncertainty in ontologies. In: Sojka, P., Horák, A., Kopeček, I., Pala, K. (eds.) TSD 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5246, pp. 227–234. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. W3C Incubator Group on Uncertainty Reasoning for the World Wide Web Final Report (2008), http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/urw3/XGR-urw3

  24. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 8, 338–353 (1965)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bobillo, F., Straccia, U. (2009). An OWL Ontology for Fuzzy OWL 2. In: Rauch, J., Raś, Z.W., Berka, P., Elomaa, T. (eds) Foundations of Intelligent Systems. ISMIS 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5722. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04125-9_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04125-9_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04124-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04125-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics