Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design ((NNFM,volume 107))

Summary

A multi-disciplinary optimisation (MDO) process chain for shape optimisation of a wing including the static deformation has been developed. The objective function, which should be minimized, is equivalent to the total aerodynamic drag force of an aircraft in stationary horizontal flight.

The CATIA V5 parametric model of the wing is controlled by the optimiser using an external CATIA-DesignTable. For four predefined wing sections there are parameters to control the thickness, camber, and twist independently giving in total 12 design parameters for the outer shape while maintaining a fixed wing planform. Additionally, two structure design parameters control the relative thickness change of the wing front and rear spars in combination with the upper and lower sheet thicknesses of the metallic wing box. The stiffness and the weight of the wing depend on these structural parameters.

An equivalent beam stick model is then automatically generated for any change of the wing box geometry. Iterative coupling between aerodynamic forces and weight forces (weight of wing- box, fuel, engines, payload, and engine thrust forces are taken into account) and equivalent beam stick bending and twisting is done until a steady state solution is obtained. Here, 12 coupling iterations are carried out using a Volume Spline technique to deform the CFD mesh according to the resulting equivalent beam stick deformation. TAU has been used as Navier-Stokes (RANS) solver on a structured mesh.

The optimiser chosen for this task is a Downhill Simplex method, which is very robust, does not require gradients, and performs well even with objective function evaluations that are subject to random noise (non-smooth). The reduction of the total drag force (objective function) and the total aircraft mass decreases due to wing box mass optimisation is shown while at the same time the aerodynamic performance L/D improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Heinrich, R., Dargel, G., Kroll, N.: MegaDesign - Spezifikation des Testfalls für den Hauptmeilenstein M8.1 im Verbundvorhaben. DLR, Institut für Aerodynamik und Strömungsmechanik (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Reimer, L., Braun, C., Chen, B.-H., Ballmann, J.: Computational Aeroelastic Design and Analysis of the HIRENASD Wind Tunnel Wing Model and Tests. In: International Forum on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics (IFASD) 2007, Stockholm, paper IF071, June 17-20 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ballmann, J., Dafnis, A., Braun, C., Korsch, H., Reimerdes, H.-G., Olivier, H.: Homepage of HIRENASD-Project, https://heinrich.lufmech.rwth-aachen.de

  4. Tau-Code User Guide, Release 2006.1.0, DLR, Göttingen/Braunschweig - Germany (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Technical Documentation of the DLR, TAU-Code, DLR, Göttingen/Braunschweig - Germany

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gerhold, T., Friedrich, O., Evans, J., Galle, M.: Calculation of Complex Three-Dimensional Configurations Employing the DLR Tau-Code. In: 35th Aerospace Science Meeting & Exhibit, Reno, NV (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Heinrich, R.: Process chain description for MegaDesign task 8.1 including mesh deformation tool based on radial basis functions, DLR, private communication (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Reimer, L., Braun, C.: Verbundvorhaben MegaDesign - Kurzdokumentation des Struktur-Präprozessors FEAFA (Finite Element Analysis for Aeroelasticity) zur Kopplung mit dem Aeroelastischen Kopplungsmodul (ACM). Lehr- und Forschungsgebiet für Mechanik, RWTH Aachen (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nelder, J.A., Mead, R.: Computer Journal 7, 308 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  10. William, H., Flannery, B., Teukolsky, S., Vetterling, W.: Numerical Recipes in C – The Art of Scientific Computing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1988)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Barnewitz, H. (2009). Flexible Wing Optimisation Based on Shapes and Structures. In: Kroll, N., Schwamborn, D., Becker, K., Rieger, H., Thiele, F. (eds) MEGADESIGN and MegaOpt - German Initiatives for Aerodynamic Simulation and Optimization in Aircraft Design. Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design, vol 107. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04093-1_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04093-1_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04092-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04093-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics