Advertisement

Management for Service Level Agreements

Conference paper

Abstract

Electronic services, like other general-purpose services, often need to be delivered at a guaranteed service level. Service Level Agreements (SLAs) can be used to address this by defining Quality of Service (QoS); but they usually are paper contracts. The delivery of electronic services, automatically provisioned and managed, calls for a more agile system based on dynamic SLAs: electronic contracts generated on-the-fly. The approach taken within BEinGRID to identify the barrier for wide enterprise adoption is presented. This lead to the identification of requirements, capacities and design patterns. Components were also developed to bridge the gap. Finally, after analysing the uptake of the software provided, conclusions are drawn, and recommendations are presented.

Keywords

Service Level Agreement Globus Toolkit Business Experiment Provider Side Usual Provider 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    A. Andrieux et al., Web Services Agreement Negotiation Specification (WSAgreementNegotiation) (draft), https://forge.gridforum.org/projects/graap-wg
  2. 2.
    A. Andrieux et al., Web Services Agreement Specification (WS-Agreement), March 2007, http://www.ogf.org/documents/GFD.107.pdf
  3. 3.
    Amazon EC2 Service Level Agreement (Effective Date: 23 October 2008), http://aws.amazon.com/ec2-sla/
  4. 4.
    Amazon S3 Service Level Agreement (Effective Date: 1 October 2007), http://aws.amazon.com/s3-sla/
  5. 5.
    Business Experiment 9 (BE09) Distributed Online Gaming, http://www.beingrid.eu/be9.html
  6. 6.
    Business Experiment 25 (BE25), Business Experiment in Enhanced IMRT planning using Grid services on-demand with SLAs (BEinEIMRT), http://www.beingrid.eu/be25.html
  7. 7.
    I. Foster, Globus Toolkit version 4: software for service-oriented systems, in IFIP International Conference on Network and Parallel Computing. LNCS, vol. 3779 (Springer, Berlin, 2005), pp. 2–13 Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gridipedia Technical Article on Service Level Agreements, Accessed 29 June 2009, http://www.gridipedia.eu/sla-article.html
  9. 9.
    List of WS-Agreement implementations, from the OGF GRAAP-WG. Visited 15 April 2009, https://forge.gridforum.org/sf/wiki/do/viewPage/projects.graap-wg/wiki/Implementations
  10. 10.
    M.L. Massie, B.N. Chun, D.E. Culler, The ganglia distributed monitoring system: design, implementation, and experience. Parallel Computing 30(5–6), 817–840 (2004) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nagios Monitoring system, http://www.nagios.org
  12. 12.
    I. Rosenberg, R. Heek, A. Juan, An SLA framework for the GT4 grid middleware, in Collaboration and the Knowledge Economy: Issues, Applications, Case Studies, ed. by P. Cunningham, M. Cunningham (IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2008) Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Setting Expectations in SaaS, white paper of the Software & Information Industry Association (SIIA), February 2007 Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    SLA@SOI, EU FP7 project committed to research, engineer and demonstrate technologies that can embed SLA-aware infrastructures into the service economy, www.sla-at-soi.org
  15. 15.
    S. Taylor, M. Surridge, D. Marvin, Grid resources for industrial applications, in Proc. 2004 IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS 04), San Diego, California (2004), pp. 402–409 Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Web Service Level Agreements (WSLA) Project, http://www.research.ibm.com/wsla/
  17. 17.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Atos OriginMadridSpain
  2. 2.Centro di Ricerca in Matematica Pura ed Applicata (CRMPA) c/o DIIMAFiscianoItaly
  3. 3.HLRSStuttgartGermany

Personalised recommendations