Skip to main content

Environmental and Cost Synergy in Supply Chain Network Integration in Mergers and Acquisitions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Multiple Criteria Decision Making for Sustainable Energy and Transportation Systems

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems ((LNE,volume 634))

Abstract

In this paper, we quantify and assess, from a supply chain network perspective, the environmental effects resulting when a merger or acquisition occurs and the resulting synergy from possible strategic gains. We develop a multicriteria decision-making supply chain network framework that captures the economic activities of manufacturing, storage, and distribution pre and post the merger. The models yield the system optima associated with the minimization of the total costs and the total emissions under firm-specific weights. We propose a synergy measure that captures the total generalized cost. We then apply the new mathematical framework to quantify the synergy obtained for specific numerical examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arora, S., & Cason, T. N. (1996). Why do firms volunteer to exceed environmental regulations? understanding participation in epa’s 33/50 program. Land Economics, 72, 413–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazaraa, M. S., Sherali, H. D., & Shetty, C. M. (1993). Nonlinear Programming: Theory and Algorithms (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckmann, M. J., McGuire, C. B., & Winsten, C. B. (1956). Studies in the Economics of Transportation. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertsekas, D. P., & Tsitsiklis, J. N. (1989). Parallel and Distributed Computation–Numerical Methods. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brush, T. H. (1996). Predicted change in operational synergy and post-acquisition performance of acquired businesses. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, P. C. (1988). A measure of the synergy in mergers under a competitive market for corporate control. Atlantic Economic Journal, 16, 59–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chankong, V., & Haimes, Y. Y. (1983). Multiobjective Decision Making: Theory and Methodology. New York: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, S. (1986). Types of synergy and economic value: The impact of acquisitions on merging and rival firms. Strategic Management Journal, 7, 119–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, S. (2007). Why is synergy so difficult in mergers of related businesses? Strategy & Leadership, 35, 46–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dafermos, S. C., & Sparrow, F. T. (1969). The traffic assignment problem for a general network. Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards, 73b, 91–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devero, A. J. (2004). Look beyond the deal. American Management Association MWORLD, 30–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhanda, K. K., Nagurney, A., & Ramanujam, P. (1999). Environmental Networks: A Framework for Economic Decision-Making and Policy Analysis. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong, J., Zhang, D., & Nagurney, A. (2002). Supply chain networks with multicriteria decision-makers. In M. A. P. Taylor, (Ed.), Transportation and Traffic Theory in the 21st Century (pp. 179–196). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Pergamon.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, R. G., Lanes, K. L., & Wilson, T. C. (1999). Are you paying too much for that acquisition? Harvard Business Review, 77, 136–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, J., & Shapiro, C. (1990). Horizontal mergers: An equilibrium analysis. The American Economic Review, 80, 107–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, J., & Shapiro, C. (2001). Scale economies and synergies in horizontal merger analysis. Antitrust Law Journal, 68, 685–710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, S. J., Soyka, P. A., & Ameer, P. G. (1997). Does improving a firm’s environmental management system and environmental performance result in a higher stock price? Journal of Investing, 6, 87–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P. C. (1970). Utility Theory for Decision Making. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J. (1982). Oligopoly theory. In K. J. Arrow & M. D. Intriligator, (Eds.), Handbook of Mathematical Economics, Vol. II (pp. 490–534). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabay, D., & Moulin, H. (1980). On the uniqueness and stability of nash equilibria in noncooperative games. In A. Bensoussan, P. Kleindorfer, & C.S. Tapiero (Eds.), Applied Stochastic Control of Econometrics and Management Science (pp. 271–293). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S., & Ahuja, G. (1996). Does it pay to be green? an empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 5, 30–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1992). Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klassen, R. D., & McLaughlin, C. P. (1996). The impact of environmental management on firm performance. Management Science, 42, 1199–1214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, B., & Leffler, K. B. (1981). The role of market forces in assuring contractual performance. Journal of Political Economy, 89, 615–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korpelevich, G. M. (1977). The extragradient method for finding saddle points and other problems. Matekon, 13, 35–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambertini, L., & Mantovani, A. (2007). Collusion helps abate environmental pollution: A dynamic approach. Technical report, Department of Economics, University of Bologna, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, T. P. (2003). Green firms bearing gifts. Regulation, 26, 36–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagurney, A. (1993). Network Economics: A Variational Inequality Approach. Boston, Massachusetts: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagurney, A. (1999). Network Economics: A Variational Inequality Approach (2nd ed.). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagurney, A. (2000). Sustainable Transportation Networks. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagurney, A. (2006a). On the relationship between supply chain and transportation network equilibria: A supernetwork equivalence with computations. Transportation Research E, 42, 293–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagurney, A. (2006b). Supply Chain Network Economics: Dynamics of Prices, Flows and Profits. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagurney, A. (2009). Formulation and analysis of horizontal mergers among oligopolistic firms with insights into the merger paradox: A supply chain network perspective. Computational Management Science, DOI 10.1007/s10287-009-0095-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagurney, A. (2009). A system-optimization perspective for supply chain integration: The horizontal merger case. Transportation Research E, 45, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagurney, A., & Dong, J. (2002). Supernetworks: Decision-Making for the Information Age. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagurney, A., Dong, J., & Mokhtarian, P. L. (2002). Traffic network equilibrium and the environment: A multicriteria decision-making perspective. In E. Kontoghiorges, B. Rustem, & S. Siokos (Eds.), Computational Methods in Decision-Making, Economics and Finance (pp. 501–523). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagurney, A., Qiang, Q., & Nagurney, L. S. (2009). Environmental impact assessment of transportation networks with degradable links in an era of climate change. To appear in the International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, page in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patriksson, M. (1994). The Traffic Assignment Problem: Models and Methods. Utrecht, The Netherlands: VSP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, P. (2002). Greening the supply chain: A new initiative in south east asia. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22, 632–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reilly, J., Prinn, R., Harnisch, J., Fitzmaurice, J., Jacoby, H., Kicklighter, D., Melillo, J., Stone, P., Sokolov, A., & Wang, C. (1999). Multi-gas assessment of the kyoto protocol. Nature, 401, 549–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice Jr., J. B., & Hoppe, R. M. (2001). Supply chain vs. supply chain: The hype and the reality. Supply Chain Management Review, 5, 46–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roper Starch Worldwide (1997). Green gauge report. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkis, J. (2003). A strategic decision framework for green supply chain management. Journal for Cleaner Production, 11, 397–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soylu, A., Oru, C., Turkay, M., Fujita, K., & Asakura, T. (2006). Synergy analysis of collaborative supply chain management in energy systems using multi-period milp. European Journal of Operational Research, 174, 387–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spector, D. (2003). Horizontal mergers, entry, and efficiency defences. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21, 1591–1600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanwick, P. A., & Stanwick, S. D. (2002). Overcoming m&a environmental problems. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 13, 33–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stennek, J. (2003). Horizontal mergers without synergies may increase consumer welfare. Topics in Economic Analysis & Policy, 3, 1074–1074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talluri, S., & Baker, R. C. (2002). Mathematical programming approach for effective supply chain design. European Journal of Operational Research, 141, 544–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tirole, J. (1988). The Theory of Industrial Organization. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Environmental Protection Agency (2005). Emission facts: Metrics for expressing greenhouse gas emissions: Carbon equivalents and carbon dioxide equivalents. Available online at http://www.epa.gov/OMS/climate/420f05002.htm.

  • Walley, N., & Whitehead, B. (1994). It’s not easy being green. Harvard Business Review, 72, 46–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardrop, J. G. (1952). Some theoretical aspects of road traffic research. In Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Part II, (Vol. 1, pp. 325–378).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, G. (2007). After credit crisis, new forces drive deals. Available online at http://CNNMoney.com.

  • World Resources Institute (1998). World resources 1998–99: Environmental change and human health. USA: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, K., Nagurney, A., Liu, Z., & Stranlund, J. K. (2006). Modeling generator power plant portfolios and pollution taxes in electric power supply chain networks: A transportation network equilibrium transformation. Transportation Research D, 11, 171–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, S. (2007). Supply Chain Synergy in Mergers and Acquisitions: Strategies, Models and Key Factors. PhD Dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, P. L. (1985). Multiple Criteria Decision Making – Concepts, Techniques, and Extensions. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zsidisin, G. A., & Siferd, S. P. (2001). Environmental purchasing: A framework for theory development. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 7, 61–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the John F. Smith Memorial Fund at the Isenberg School of Management. This support is gratefully acknowledged.

The first author thanks Professor Matthias Ehrgott, the organizer of the 19th International MCDM Conference, held January 7–12, 2008, in Auckland, New Zealand, and all the participants for many helpful and stimulating discussions which led to this paper. The authors acknowledge the helpful comments and suggestions of an anonymous reviewer and the Editors of this volume on an earlier version of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Nagurney .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Nagurney, A., Woolley, T. (2010). Environmental and Cost Synergy in Supply Chain Network Integration in Mergers and Acquisitions. In: Ehrgott, M., Naujoks, B., Stewart, T., Wallenius, J. (eds) Multiple Criteria Decision Making for Sustainable Energy and Transportation Systems. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 634. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04045-0_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics