Abstract
This paper is concerned with the problem of deriving priorities (criteria weights and scores of alternatives) from pairwise comparison judgments, in the framework of the Analytical Hierarchy Process. The elicitation of priorities is represented as a multi-criteria optimization problem and the multiobjective evolutionary algorithm PESA-II is applied for its solving. The method and the performance of the evolutionary algorithm are illustrated by an example, and the results are compared to those obtained by other algorithms.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Coello Coello, C. A. (2006). Evolutionary multi-objective optimization: a historical view of the field. IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine, 1(1), 28–36.
Corne, D. W., Jerram, N. R., Knowles, J. D., & Oates, M. J. (2001). PESA-II: region-based Selection in Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization. In Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO’2001), (pp. 283–290).
Deb, K. (1999). Evolutionary algorithms for multi-criterion optimization in engineering design. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Golany, B., & Kress, M. (1993). A multicriteria evaluation of methods for obtaining weights from ratio-scale matrices. European Journal of Operational Research, 69, 210–220.
Mikhailov, L. (2004). Deriving priorities from ratio-scale comparison judgements: A multiple objective approach. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference MCDM’2004, Whistler, Canada.
Mikhailov, L. (2006). Multiobjective prioritisation in the analytic hierarchy process using evolutionary computing. In A. Tiwari, J. Knowles, E. Avineri, K. Dahal, & R. Roy (Eds.), Applications of soft computing: recent trends pp. 321–330. Berlin: Springer,.
Saaty, T., & Vargas, L. (1984). Comparison of eigenvalue, logarithmic least squares and least squares methods in estimation ratios. Mathematical Modeling, 5, 309–324.
Saaty, T. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15, 234–281.
Sawaragi, Y., Nakayama, H., & Tanino, T. (1985). Theory of multiobjective optimization. Orlando: Academic.
Veldhuizen, D., & Lamont, G. (2000). Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: analyzing the state-of-the-art. Evolutionary Computing, 8, 125–147.
Zitzler, E., Laumanns, M., & Bleuler, S. (2004). A tutorial on evolutionary multiobjective optimization. LNEMS, 535, 3–37.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mikhailov, L., Knowles, J. (2010). Priority Elicitation in the AHP by a Pareto Envelope-Based Selection Algorithm. In: Ehrgott, M., Naujoks, B., Stewart, T., Wallenius, J. (eds) Multiple Criteria Decision Making for Sustainable Energy and Transportation Systems. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 634. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04045-0_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04045-0_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04044-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04045-0
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)