Advertisement

Imperfect Competition, Learning and Fluctuations

  • Piero FerriEmail author
  • Anna Maria Variato
Chapter

Abstract

The strategic roles of imperfect competition and monopolistic competition have undergone considerable changes since their inception in the thirties, when (Robinson 1933) and (Chamberlin 1933) first and independently formalized the two similar concepts. For instance, their field of application has transcended microeconomics to occupy an important place in macroeconomics, where they are supposed to be superior with respect to perfect competition. This happened some time ago (see Kalecki 1971; Minsky 1954, 2004), and it has been recently reformulated in the so called “new” Keynesian literature (see Blanchard and Kiyotaki 1987).

This potential superiority, however, has been strongly limited by the presence of two hypotheses, namely the symmetry hypothesis and the rational expectation assumption, which are instead untenable in a world of imperfect knowledge economics (IKE, according to the definition of Frydman and Goldberg 2007). Specifically, in such an environment, heterogeneity among agents rules out the symmetry hypothesis. Furthermore, the presence of imperfect knowledge suggests that the interdependence processes characterizing heterogeneous agents must be dealt with in a simplified macro approach. Finally, agents have to learn the dynamic process from the data.

Keywords

Income Distribution Aggregate Demand Recursive Little Square Regime Switching Imperfect Competition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akerlof, G. A. (2007). The missing motivation in macroeconomics. American Economic Review, 97, 5–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aoki, M., & Yoshikawa, H. (2007). A Perspective from statistical physics and combinatorial stochastic processes. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  3. Asada, T. P., Chen, C., Chiarella, C., & Flaschel, P. (2006). Keynesian dynamics and the wage- price spiral: A baseline disequilibrium model. Journal of Macroeconomics, 28, 90–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blanchard, O. J. (1997). The medium-run. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2, 89–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blanchard O. J. (2008). The state of macro. NBER Working Papers, n.14259, Cambridge (MA)Google Scholar
  6. Blanchard, O. J., & Kiyotaki, N. (1987). Monopolistic competition and the effects of aggregate demand. American Economic Review, 77, 647–666Google Scholar
  7. Branch, W. A., & Evans, G. W. (2006). A simple recursive forecasting model. Economic Letters, 91, 158–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cellarier, L. L. (2008). Least squares learning and business cycles. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 68, 553–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chamberlin, E. H. (1933). The theory of monopolistic competition. Cambridge (Mass): Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
  10. Comin, D., & Gertler, M. (2006). Medium- term business cycles. American Economic Review, 96, 523–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Day, R. H., & Walter, J. L. (1989). Economic growth in the very long-run: On the multiple-phase interaction of population, technology and social infrastructure. In W. A. Barnett, J. Geweke, & K. Shell (Eds.), Economic complexity. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  12. De Grauwe, P. (2008). Animal spirits and monetary policy. CeSifo Working Paper, 2418, Munich, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  13. D. Delli Gatti & M. Gallegati (Ed.) (2002). Eterogeneità degli agenti economici e interazione sociale: Teorie e verifiche empiriche. Bologna: Il MulinoGoogle Scholar
  14. Evans, G. W., & Honkapohja, S. (2001). Learning and expectations. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  15. Fazzari, S., Ferri, P., & Greenberg, E. (1998). Aggregate demand and firm behavior: A new perspective on Keynesian microfoundations. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 20 (Summer), 527–558Google Scholar
  16. Fazzari, S., Ferri, P., & Greenberg, E. (2008). Cash flow, investment and Keynes-Minsky cycles. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 65, 555–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ferri, P. (2007). The labor market and technical change in endogenous cycles. Metroeconomica, 58 (Winter), 609–633Google Scholar
  18. Ferri, P. (2008). The economics of nonlinearity. In R. Scazzieri, A. K. Sen, & S. Zamagni (Eds.), Markets, money and capital. Hicksian economics for the 21stcentury. Cambridge(UK): Cambridge University Press, forthcomingGoogle Scholar
  19. Ferri, P., Greenberg, E., & Day, R. H. (2001). The Phillips curve, regime switching, and the Nairu. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 46, 23–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Frydman, R., & Goldberg, M. D. (2007). Imperfect knowledge economics. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  21. Hommes, C., & Sorger, G. (1998). Consistent expectations equilibria. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 2, 287–321Google Scholar
  22. Howitt, P. (2006). Coordination issues in the long-run growth. In L. Tesfatsion & I. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of computational economics, (Vol. 2, pp. 1606–1624)Google Scholar
  23. IMF (2008). Annual Report, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  24. Kalecki, M. (1971). Selected essays on the dynamics of a capitalist economy. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  25. Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit. Boston (Mass): Houghton MifflinGoogle Scholar
  26. Kuznestov, Y. A. (2004). Elements of applied bifurcation theory. New York: SpringerGoogle Scholar
  27. Leijonhufvud, A. (2006). Agent-based macro. In L. Tesfatsion & K. I. Budd (Eds.), Handbook of computational economics, (Vol. 2, pp. 1626–1637). Amsterdam: ElsevierGoogle Scholar
  28. Minsky, H. P. (1954, 2004). Induced Investment and Business Cycles. Cheltenham (UK): Edward ElgarGoogle Scholar
  29. Pasinetti, L. (2007). Keynes and the cambridge keynesians. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  30. Rotemberg, J., & Woodford, M. (1996). Imperfect competition and the effects of energy price increases on economic activity. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 28, 549–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Robinson, J. (1933). The economics of imperfect competition. London: MacmillanGoogle Scholar
  32. Sargent, T. J. (1999). The conquest of American inflation. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  33. Solow, R. (1998). Monopolistic competition and macroeconomic theory. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  34. Solow, R. (2000). Towards a macroeconomics of the medium run. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14, 151–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tesfatsion, L. (2006). Agent-based computational economics: a constructive approach to economic theory. In L. Tesfatsion & K. I. Budd (Eds.), Handbook of computational economics, (Vol. 2, pp. 831–880). Amsterdam: ElsevierGoogle Scholar
  36. Tong, H. (1990). Non-linear time series. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  37. Woodford, M. (2003). Interest and prices. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  38. Yokoo, M., & Ishida, J. (2008). Misperception-driven chaos: Theory and policy implications. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 32, 1732–1753CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di EconomiaUniversità di BergamoBergamoItaly

Personalised recommendations