Advertisement

Delay Differential Nonlinear Economic Models

  • Akio MatsumotoEmail author
  • Ferenc Szidarovszky
Chapter

Abstract

The asymptotical behavior of dynamic economic systems has been the focus of a large number of studies with both discrete and continuous time scales. They are based on the qualitative theory of difference or ordinary differential equations (Bellman, 1969; Goldberg, 1958). It has been shown by many authors that the introduction of information delay into the dynamic models significantly changes their asymptotical properties. For example, Chiarella and Szidarovszky (2004) consider dynamic oligopolies with partial information on the price function and Huang (2008) examines the role of information lag in economic dynamics, to name a few.

There is a significant difference between models with fixed time lags and models with continuously distributed delays. In the first case there is an infinite spectrum, and in the second case with gamma-function type kernel functions, the spectrum is finite. An important special case of continuously distributed time lags is given by exponentially decreasing kernel functions.

In this paper we compare dynamics generated by fixed time lags and continuously distributed delay with exponential kernel function. We will first show that these two types of models generate the same local dynamics if the delay is sufficiently small. This is, however, not true if the delay becomes large.

Keywords

Hopf Bifurcation Price Function Cournot Model Business Cycle Model Investment Function 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper was done when the first author visited the Department of Systems and Industrial Engineering of the University of Arizona. He appreciated its hospitality over his stay. The authors wish to express their gratitude to an anonymous referee for useful comments and also want to acknowledge the encouragement and support by Kei Matsumoto for the research leading to this paper. They appreciate financial support from Chuo University (Joint Research Project 0981) and the Japan Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) 21530172). The usual disclaimer applies.

References

  1. Bellman, R. (1969). Stability theory of differential equations. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
  2. Bischi, G., Chiarella, C., Kopel, M., & Szidarovszky, F. (2009). Nonlinear oligopolies: Stability and bifurcations. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  3. Chang, W., & Smyth, D. (1971). The existence and persistence of cycles in a non-linear model: Kaldor’s 1940 model reexamined. Review of Economic Studies, 38, 37–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chiarella, C., & Szidarovszky, F. (2004). Dynamic oligopolies without full information and with continuously distributed time lags. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 54, 495–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Goldberg, S. (1958). Introduction to difference equations. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Goodwin, R. (1951). The nonlinear accelerator and the persistence of business cycle. Econometrica, 19, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Huang, W. (2008). Information lag and dynamic stability. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 44, 513–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kaldor, N. (1940). A model of the trade cycle. Economic Journal, 50, 78–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kalecki, M. (1935). A macroeconomic theory of the business cycle. Econometrica, 3, 327–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Matsumoto, A. (2009). Note on Goodwin’s 1951 nonlinear accelerator model with an investment lag. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 33, 832–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Matsumoto, A., & Szidarovszky, F. (2007). Delayed nonlinear cournot and bertrand dynamics with product differentiation. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology and Life Sciences, 11, 367–395.Google Scholar
  12. Matsumoto, A., & Szidarovszky, F. (2009). Dynamic Goodwin’s business cycle model with continuously distributed time lags (DP 115). Institute of Economic Research, Chuo University.Google Scholar
  13. Puu, T. (2003). Attractors, bifurcations and chaos (2nd edn.). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  14. Puu, T., & Sushko, I. (2002). Oligopoly dynamics. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsChuo UniversityHachiojiJapan

Personalised recommendations