Skip to main content

‘MULTIPLES’: A Challenging Learning Framework for the Generation of Multiple Perspectives within e-Collaboration Settings

  • Chapter
Intelligent Collaborative e-Learning Systems and Applications

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 246))

  • 689 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter proposes a learning framework - the MULTIPLES framework (Multiple: Learning Tools, Interactions, Perspectives, Learning Experiences and Solution Strategies) - that can be used in e-collaboration settings to encourage the development of multiple perspectives for each individual student regarding the learning concepts in focus. This framework has been designed within the context of social and constructivist learning theories, acknowledging the role of asking learners, working in both groups and individually, to face appropriately designed learning tasks by using multiple learning tools and representation systems while at the same time performing various interactions in order to produce multiple solution strategies ‘in as many ways as possible’. To this end, a case study is reported that illuminates the role played by MULTIPLES in the enhancement of each individual student’s views by generating different solution strategies to the tasks at hand, while at the same time expressing their inter- and intra-individual differences. Specifically, 25 secondary level education students participated in a learning experiment consisting of two tasks asking for the construction of multiple solution strategies regarding the concept of area measurement by exploiting the plethora of tools and representation systems provided by the well-known educational software Cabri-Geometry II (Laborde, 1990). The analysis of the data shows that all these students truly exploited their collaborative experience during the former task and constructed various solution strategies when individually facing the second task, at the same time developing multiple perspectives of the aforementioned learning concepts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bednar, A.K., Cunningham, D., Duffy, T.M., Perry, J.D.: Theory into practice: How do we link? In: Anglin, G.J. (ed.) Instructional Technology: Past, present and future. Libraries Unlimited, Englewood (1991); Bennett, N.: Teaching styles and Pupil Progress. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cohen, L., Manion, L.: Research Methods in Education. Routledge, London (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Collins, A.: Cognitive apprenticeship and instructional technology. In: Idol, L., Jones, B.F. (eds.) Educational values and cognitive instruction; Implications for reform, pp. 121–138. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dabbagh, N., Bannan-Ritland, B.: Online learning: Concepts, strategies, and application. Pearson, Merrill Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Duffy, T.M., Cunningham, D.J.: Constructivism: Implications for the design and delivery of instruction. In: Jonassen, D.H. (ed.) Handbook of educational communications and technology, pp. 170–198. Simon & Schuster Macmillan, New York (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dabbagh, N.: Pedagogical models for E-Learning: A theory-based design framework. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning 1(1), 25–44 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Daradoumis, T., Marques, J.M.: Distributed Cognition in the Context of Virtual Collaborative Learning. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 13(1/2), 135–148 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dennen, V.P.: Task structuring for on-line problem-based learning: A case study. Educational Technology & Society 3(3), 329–336 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dillenbourg, P., Schneider, D., Synteta, P.: Virtual Learning Environments. In: Proceedings of 3rd Panhelenic Conference: ICT in Education, Rhodes, Greece, pp. 3–18 (September 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Duch, B.J., Groh, S.E., Allen, D.E.: Why problem-based learning? A case study of institutional change in undergraduate education. In: Duch, B.J., Groh, S.E., Allen, D.E. (eds.) The Power of Problem-Based Learning, pp. 3–12. Stylus Publishing, Sterling (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Duffy, M.T., Lowyck, J., Jonassen, H.D.: Designing environments for constructive learning. Springer, Berlin (1993)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Harasim, L.: Online Education: Perspectives on a new Environment. Praeger, N.Y (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Harasim, L., Hiltz, S.R., Teles, L., Turoff, M.: Learning Networks: a field guide to Teaching and Learning Online. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hart, K.-M.: Measurement. In: Murray, J. (ed.) Childrens Understanding of Mathematics, pp. 9–22. Athenaeum Press Ltd., G. Britain (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Janvier, C.: Representation and understanding: The notion of function as an example. In: Janvier, C. (ed.) Problems of representation in teaching and learning of mathematics, pp. 67–72. Lawrence erlbaum associates, London (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jonassen, D.H.: Objectivism versus constructivism: do we need a new philosophical paradigm? Journal of Educational Research 39(3), 5–14 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jonassen, D.H., Carr, C., Yueh, H.-P.: Computers as Mindtools for Engaging Learners in Critical Thinking. Tech. Trends 43(2), 24–32 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jonassen, D.H.: Designing constructivist learning environments. Instructional design theories and models 2, 215–239 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jonassen, H.D.: Revisiting Activity Theory as a Framework for Designing Student-Centered Learning Environments. In: Jonassen, D.H., Land, S.M. (eds.) Theoretical Foundations of Learning Environments, pp. 89–121. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Joyce, B., Weil, M.: Models of Teaching. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kaput, J.J.: The Representational Roles of Technology in Connecting Mathematics with Authentic Experience. In: Biehler, R., Scholz, R.W., Strasser, R., Winkelman, B. (eds.) Didactics of Mathematics as a Scientific Discipline: The state of the art, pp. 379–397. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kordaki, M.: The effect of tools of a computer microworld on students’ strategies regarding the concept of conservation of area. Educational Studies in Mathematics 52, 177–209 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kordaki, M.: The role of multiple representation systems in the enhancement of the learner model. In: 3rd International Conference on Multimedia and Information and Communication Technologies in Education, Caceres, Spain, June 2005, pp. 253–258 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kordaki, M.: Multiple Representation Systems and Students’ Inter-Individual Learning Differences. In: Kommers, P., Richards, G. (eds.) Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications (ED-MEDIA), pp. 2127–2134. AACE, Chesapeake (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kordaki, M., Balomenou, A.: Challenging students to view the concept of area in triangles in a broader context: exploiting the tools of Cabri II. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning 11(1), 99–135 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Laborde, J.-M.: Cabri-Geometry. Universite de Grenoble, France (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lemerise, T.: On Intra Interindividual Differences in Children’s Learning Styles. In: Hoyles, C., Noss, R. (eds.) Learning Mathematics and Logo, pp. 191–222. MIT Press, Cambridge (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Maureen, T.: Constructivism, Instructional Design, and Technology: Implications for Transforming Distance Learning. Educational Technology & Society 3(2), 50–60 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Murphy, R., Ness, G., Pelletier, J.: Problem-Based Learning Using Web-Based Group Discussions: A Positive Learning Experience for Undergraduate Students. In: Crawford, C., et al. (eds.) Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2001, pp. 1149–1154. AACE, Chesapeake (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Nardi, B.A.: Studying context: A comparison of activity theory, situated action models, and distributed cognition. In: Nardi, B.A. (ed.) Context and consciousness:Activity theory and human-computer interaction, MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Noss, R., Hoyles, C.: Windows on mathematical meanings: Learning Cultures and Computers. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Papert, S.: Mindstorms: Pupils, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. Basic Books, New York (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Pea, R.D.: Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education. In: Salomon, G. (ed.) Distributed cognitions. Psychological and educational considerations, pp. 47–87. Cambridge University Press, NY (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Rogoff, B.: Developing understanding of the idea of communities of learners. Mind, Culture, and Activity 4, 209–229 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Rogers, Y.: A Brief Introduction to Distributed Cognition (August 1997), http://www.cogs.susx.ac.uk/users/yvonner/dcog.html (Retrieved on September 11, 2008)

  36. Salomon, G.: Distributed Cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge University Press, New York (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Schmeck, R.R.: Learning Strategies and Learning Styles. Plenum, New York (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Silver, E.A., Leung, S.S., Cai, J.: Generating multiple solutions for a problem: a comparison of the responses of U.S. and Japanese students. Educational Studies in Mathematics 28, 35–54 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Snow, R.E.: Individual differences and the design of Educational programs. American Psychologist 41, 1029–1039 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Vygotsky, L.: Mind in Society. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Wilson, B.G., Cole, P.: Cognitive teaching models. In: Jonassen, D.H. (ed.) Handbook of research for educational communications and technology, pp. 601–621. Simon & Schuster Macmillan, New York (1996)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kordaki, M. (2009). ‘MULTIPLES’: A Challenging Learning Framework for the Generation of Multiple Perspectives within e-Collaboration Settings. In: Daradoumis, T., Caballé, S., Marquès, J.M., Xhafa, F. (eds) Intelligent Collaborative e-Learning Systems and Applications. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 246. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04001-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04001-6_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04000-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04001-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics