Abstract
We study a model of communication complexity that encompasses many well-studied problems, including classical and quantum communication complexity, the complexity of simulating distributions arising from bipartite measurements of shared quantum states, and XOR games. In this model, Alice gets an input x, Bob gets an input y, and their goal is to each produce an output a,b distributed according to some pre-specified joint distribution p(a,b|x,y). Our results apply to any non-signaling distribution, that is, those where Alice’s marginal distribution does not depend on Bob’s input, and vice versa.
By introducing a simple new technique based on affine combinations of lower-complexity distributions, we give the first general technique to apply to all these settings, with elementary proofs and very intuitive interpretations. The lower bounds we obtain can be expressed as linear programs (or SDPs for quantum communication). We show that the dual formulations have a striking interpretation, since they coincide with maximum violations of Bell and Tsirelson inequalities. The dual expressions are closely related to the winning probability of XOR games. Despite their apparent simplicity, these lower bounds subsume many known communication complexity lower bound methods, most notably the recent lower bounds of Linial and Shraibman for the special case of Boolean functions.
We show that as in the case of Boolean functions, the gap between the quantum and classical lower bounds is at most linear in the size of the support of the distribution, and does not depend on the size of the inputs. This translates into a bound on the gap between maximal Bell and Tsirelson inequality violations, which was previously known only for the case of distributions with Boolean outcomes and uniform marginals. It also allows us to show that for some distributions, information theoretic methods are necessary to prove strong lower bounds.
Finally, we give an exponential upper bound on quantum and classical communication complexity in the simultaneous messages model, for any non-signaling distribution.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Yao, A.C.C.: Some complexity questions related to distributive computing. In: Proc. 11th STOC, pp. 209–213 (1979)
Kushilevitz, E., Nisan, N.: Communication complexity. Cambridge University Press, New York (1997)
Maudlin, T.: Bell’s inequality, information transmission, and prism models. In: Biennal Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 404–417 (1992)
Brassard, G., Cleve, R., Tapp, A.: Cost of Exactly Simulating Quantum Entanglement with Classical Communication. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1874–1877 (1999); quant-ph/9901035
Steiner, M.: Towards quantifying non-local information transfer: finite-bit non-locality. Phys. Lett. A 270, 239–244 (2000)
Toner, B.F., Bacon, D.: Communication Cost of Simulating Bell Correlations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 187904 (2003)
Cerf, N.J., Gisin, N., Massar, S., Popescu, S.: Simulating Maximal Quantum Entanglement without Communication. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94(22), 220403 (2005)
Degorre, J., Laplante, S., Roland, J.: Classical simulation of traceless binary observables on any bipartite quantum state. Phys. Rev. A 75(012309) (2007)
Regev, O., Toner, B.: Simulating quantum correlations with finite communication. In: Proc. 48th FOCS, pp. 384–394 (2007)
Shi, Y., Zhu, Y.: Tensor norms and the classical communication complexity of nonlocal quantum measurement. SIAM J. Comput. 38(3), 753–766 (2008)
Jones, N.S., Masanes, L.: Interconversion of nonlocal correlations. Phys. Rev. A 72, 052312 (2005)
Barrett, J., Pironio, S.: Popescu-Rohrlich correlations as a unit of nonlocality. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 140401 (2005)
Linial, N., Shraibman, A.: Lower bounds in communication complexity based on factorization norms. Random Struct. Algorithms 34(3), 368–394 (2009)
Navascues, M., Pironio, S., Acin, A.: A convergent hierarchy of semidefinite programs characterizing the set of quantum correlations. New J. Phys. 10(7), 073013 (2008)
Randall, C.H., Foulis, D.J.: Operational statistics and tensor products. In: Interpretations and Foundations of Quantum Theory, Volume Interpretations and Foundations of Quantum Theory, pp. 21–28. Wissenschaftsverlag, BibliographischesInstitut (1981)
Foulis, D.J., Randall, C.H.: Empirical logic and tensor products. In: Interpretations and Foundations of Quantum Theory, Volume Interpretations and Foundations of Quantum Theory, pp. 1–20. Wissenschaftsverlag, BibliographischesInstitut (1981)
Kläy, M., Randall, C.H., Foulis, D.J.: Tensor products and probability weights. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 26(3), 199–219 (1987)
Wilce, A.: Tensor products in generalized measure theory. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 31(11), 1915–1928 (1992)
Barrett, J.: Information processing in generalized probabilistic theories. Phys. Rev. A 75(3), 032304 (2007)
Alon, N., Naor, A.: Approximating the cut-norm via Grothendieck’s inequality. SIAM J. Comput. 35(4), 787–803 (2006)
Tsirelson, B.S.: Zapiski Math. Inst. Steklov (LOMI) 142, 174–194 (1985); English translation in Quantum analogues of the Bell inequalities. The case of two spatially separated domains. J. Soviet Math. 36, 557–570 (1987)
Linial, N., Mendelson, S., Schechtman, G., Shraibman, A.: Complexity measures of sign matrices. Combinatorica 27, 439–463 (2007)
Bell, J.S.: On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox. Physics 1, 195 (1964)
Tsirelson, B.S.: Quantum generalizations of Bell’s inequality. Lett. Math. Phys. 4(2), 93–100 (1980)
Yao, A.C.C.: On the power of quantum fingerprinting. In: Proc. 35th STOC, pp. 77–81 (2003)
Gavinsky, D., Kempe, J., de Wolf, R.: Strengths and weaknesses of quantum fingerprinting. In: Proc. 21st CCC, pp. 288–295 (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Degorre, J., Kaplan, M., Laplante, S., Roland, J. (2009). The Communication Complexity of Non-signaling Distributions. In: Královič, R., Niwiński, D. (eds) Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science 2009. MFCS 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5734. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03816-7_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03816-7_24
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-03815-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-03816-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)