Abstract
eConsultations have been used in many countries over many years, yet most research in the field is case descriptions and there is so far little systematic evidence as to the effectiveness of consultations as a tool for enhancing democracy. Using a case survey method we investigate what factors make a consultation succeed or fail based on data from 57 cases reported in the literature. Success is measured as high participation, deliberative mode of discussion, and impact on policy. We test three hypotheses from the literature claiming, respectively, that institutional design, democratic intent, and quality of research are the most important factors behind the reported success. We find support for all hypotheses. Using consultation at the analysis/decision making stage, mixing online and offline methods and active strategic recruiting are institutional factors positively contributing. Democratic intent and content analysis research both have positive influence.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Albrecht, S.: Whose Voice is Heard in Online Deliberation? A Study of Participation and Representation in Political Debates on the Internet. Information, Communication & Society 9(1), 62–82 (February 2006), http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title%7Econtent=t713699183%7Edb=all%7Etab=issueslist%7Ebranches=9#v9 , http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title%7Econtent=g741434872%7Edb=all
Beierle, T., Konisky, D.M.: Values, Conflict, and Trust in Participatory Environmental Planning. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 19(4), 587–602 (2000)
Blaug, R.: Engineering democracy. Political Studies 50, 102–116 (2002)
Daemen, H.H.F.M., Schaap, L. (eds.): Citizen and City: Developments in Fifteen Local Democracies. Delft, The Netherlands (2000)
Danielson, M., Grönlund, Å., Ekenberg, L., Larsson, A.: Public Decision Support - Using a DSS to Increase Democratic Transparency. International Journal of Public Information Systems 1(1) (2005), Electronic journal, http://www.ijpis.net/
DEMO_net Demo_net D5.1: Report on current ICTs to enable participation (2006), http://www.demo-net.org (retrieved December 16, 2008),
DEMO_net /eParticipation Evaluation and Impact. /DEMO-net D13.3./ (2006b), http://www.demo-net.org (retrieved December 16, 2008),
DEMO_net Analytical report on eParticipation research from an Administrative and Political Perspective./ DEMO_net D14.1(2008) (retrieved December 16, 2008), http://www.demo-net.org
Dunn, W.N.: Public Policy Analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1994)
Hayward, C.: Introducing e-enabled citizens panels. The Local e-Democracy National Project (2005), www.e-democracy.gov.uk
Fung, A.: Recipes for Public Spheres: Eight Institutional Design Choices and their Consequences. The journal of Political Philosophy 11(3), 338–367 (2003)
Fung, A.: Varieties of Participation in Complex Governance. Public Administration Review (December 2006); Special issue
Grönlund, Å.: Emerging Electronic Infrastructures - Exploring Democratic Components. Social Science Computer Review 21(1), 55–72 (spring 2003)
Jankowski, N.W., Van Os, R.: Internet-based Political Discourse: A Case Study of Electronic Democracy in Hoogeveen. Paper presented at the Conference Prospects for Electronic Democracy, Pittsburgh, PA, September 20-21 (2002)
Jensen, J.L.: Virtual Democratic Dialogue? Bringing together Citizens and Politicians. Information Polity 8(1) (2003)
John, P.: Methodologies and Research Methods in Urban Political Science. In: Baldersheim, H., Wollman, H. (eds.) The Comparative Study of Local Government and Politics: Overview and Synthesis. Barbara Budrich Publishers, Opladen (2006)
Polat, K., Rabia: The Internet and democratic local governance: the context of Britain. The International Information & Library Review 37, 87–97 (2005)
Larsson, R.: Case survey methodology: Quantitative analysis of patterns across case studies. Academy of Management Journal 36(6), 1515–1546 (1993)
Loughlin, J.: Subnational Democracy in the European Union. Challenges and Opportunities. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2001)
Lucas, W.: The case survey method of aggregating case experience. Rand, Santa Monica (1974)
Macintosh, A.: eParticipation in policy-making: the research and the challenges. In: Exploiting the Knowledge Economy: Issues, Applications, Case Studies. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2006)
Macintosh, A., Whyte, A.: Evaluating how eParticipation Changes Local Democracy. In: eGovernment Workshop 2006 (eGOV 2006), September 11, 2006. Brunel University, West London, UB8 3PH (2006)
Morrison, J., Newman, R.: On-line Citizenship: Consultation and Participation in New Labour’s Britain and Beyond. International Review of Law Computers & Technology 15(2), 171–194 (2001)
Märker, O., Morgenstern, B., Hagedorn, H., Trénel, M.: Integrating Public Knowledge into Decision Making. Use Case: Internet Public Hearing in the City of Esslingen. In: Wimmer, M. (ed.) Knowledge Management in e-Government - KMGov 2002. 3rd International Workshop on Knowledge Management in e-Government, May 23-24, 2002. Trauner Druck, Linz (2002)
Norris, P.: Digital divide? In: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)
Peart, M.N., Diaz, J.R.: Comparative Project on Local e-Democracy Initiatives in Europe and North America. University of Geneva, Geneva (2007)
OECD. Citizens as Partners: Information, consultation and public participation in policy-making: OECD, Paris (2001)
Olsson, J., Åström, J. (eds.): Democratic eGovernance: Approaches and Research Directions. Almqvist & Wiksell International, Stockholm (2006)
Phillips, A.: Why does Local Democracy Matter? In: Pratchett, L., Wilson, D. (eds.) Local Democracy and Local Government. MacMillan Press Ltd. London (1996)
Putnam, R.: Bowling Alone. In: The Collaps and Revival of American Community. Free Press, New York (2000)
Rose, J., Saebo, O.: Democracy Squared. Designing On-line Communities to Accommodate Conflicting Interests. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 17(2), 133–168 (2005)
Rowe, G., Frewer, L.J.: Evaluating Public-Participation Exercises: A Research Agenda. In: Science, Technology & Human Values, vol. 29(4), pp. 512–556 (2004)
Seawright, J., Gerring, J.: Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research. A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options. Political Research Quarterly 61(2), 294–308 (2008)
Stewart, K.: Write Rules and Win: Understanding Citizen Participation Game Dynamics. Public Administration Review (November/December 2007)
Yin, R.: Case study research: Design and methods, 2nd edn. Sage Publishing, Beverly Hills (1994)
Åström, J.: Mot en digital demokrati? Teknik, politik och institutionell förändring (Towards a digital democracy? In: Technology, politics, and institutional change). Örebro Studies in Political Science, vol. 9, Örebro University, Orebro (2004)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Grönlund, Å., Åström, J. (2009). DoIT Right: Measuring Effectiveness of Different eConsultation Designs. In: Macintosh, A., Tambouris, E. (eds) Electronic Participation. ePart 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5694. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03781-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03781-8_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-03780-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-03781-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)