Skip to main content

Sacral Screw Fixation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Spine Trauma

Abstract

Because of the difficulty in obtaining a fusion across the lumbosacral junction, special consideration must be given to obtain adequate sacral fixation. Options include anteromedial (pedicle) or anterolateral (alar) screws at the S1. Alternatively, screws can be placed in the S2 region, although these screws are only viewed as adjuncts to other points of sacral fixation. Bone quality, purchase of cortical bone, and screw length all influence the strength of a construct, with bicortical purchase in the S1 pedicle identified as the best option in multiple load-to-failure tests. Surgeons must remember, however, that the added fixation afforded with bicortical placement of screws must be balanced with the added risk of neurovascular injury.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Allen BL Jr, Ferguson RL (1988) A 1988 perspective on the Galveston technique of pelvic fixation. Orthop Clin North Am 19:409–418

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Allen BL Jr, Ferguson RL (1988) The Galveston experience with L-rod instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 229:59–69

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Asher MA, Strippgen WE (1986) Anthropometric studies of the human sacrum relating to dorsal transsacral implant designs. Clin Orthop Relat Res 203:58–62

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Camp JF, Caudle R, Ashmun RD et al (1990) Immediate complications of Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation to the sacro-pelvis. A clinical and biomechanical study. Spine 15:932–941

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Carlson GD, Abitbol JJ, Anderson DR et al (1992) Screw fixation in the human sacrum. An in vitro study of the biomechanics of fixation. Spine 17:S196–S203

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Devlin VJ, Boachie-Adjei O, Bradford DS et al (1991) Treatment of adult spinal deformity with fusion to the sacrum using CD instrumentation. J Spinal Disord 4:1–14

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ebraheim NA, Lu J, Yang H et al (1997) Anatomic considerations of the second sacral vertebra and dorsal screw placement. Surg Radiol Anat 19:353–357

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ergur I, Akcali O, Kiray A et al (2007) Neurovascular risks of sacral screws with bicortical purchase: an anatomical study. Eur Spine J 16:1519–1523

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Esses SI, Botsford DJ, Huler RJ et al (1991) Surgical anatomy of the sacrum. A guide for rational screw fixation. Spine 16:S283–S288

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Grobler LJ, Frymoyer JW, Robertson PA et al (1993) Biomechanics of the lumbar spine. Semin Spine Surg 5:59–72

    Google Scholar 

  11. Harrington PR, Dickson JH (1976) Spinal instrumentation in the treatment of severe progressive spondylolisthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 117:157–163

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kostuik JP, Errico TJ, Gleason TF (1986) Techniques of internal fixation for degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 203:219–231

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kostuik JP, Hall BB (1983) Spinal fusions to the sacrum in adults with scoliosis. Spine 8:489–500

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Krag MH, Beynnon BD, Pope MH et al (1988) Depth of insertion of transpedicular vertebral screws into human vertebrae: effect upon screw-vertebra interface strength. J Spinal Disord 1:287–294

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kuklo TR, Bridwell KH, Lewis SJ et al (2001) Minimum 2-year analysis of sacropelvic fixation and L5-S1 fusion using S1 and iliac screws. Spine 26:1976–1983

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lehman RA Jr, Kuklo TR, Belmont PJ Jr et al (2002) Advantage of pedicle screw fixation directed into the apex of the sacral promontory over bicortical fixation: a biomechanical analysis. Spine 27:806–811

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Licht NJ, Rowe DE, Ross LM (1992) Pitfalls of pedicle screw fixation in the sacrum. A cadaver model. Spine 17:892–896

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Louis R (1986) Fusion of the lumbar and sacral spine by internal fixation with screw plates. Clin Orthop Relat Res 203:18–33

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Luk KD, Chen L, Lu WW (2005) A stronger bicortical sacral pedicle screw fixation through the s1 endplate: an in vitro cyclic loading and pull-out force evaluation. Spine 30:525–529

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. McCord DH, Cunningham BW, Shono Y et al (1992) Biomechanical analysis of lumbosacral fixation. Spine 17:S235–S243

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mirkovic S, Abitbol JJ, Steinman J et al (1991) Anatomic consideration for sacral screw placement. Spine 16:S289–S294

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Moshirfar A, Rand FF, Sponseller PD et al (2005) Pelvic fixation in spine surgery. Historical overview, indications, biomechanical relevance, and current techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(suppl 2):89–106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Peretz AM, Hipp JA, Heggeness MH (1998) The internal bony architecture of the sacrum. Spine 23:971–974

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Robertson PA, Plank LD (1999) Pedicle screw placement at the sacrum: anatomical characterization and limitations at S1. J Spinal Disord 12:227–233

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Smith SA, Abitbol JJ, Carlson GD et al (1993) The effects of depth of penetration, screw orientation, and bone density on sacral screw fixation. Spine 18:1006–1010

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Steffee AD, Biscup RS, Sitkowski DJ (1986) Segmental spine plates with pedicle screw fixation. A new internal fixation device for disorders of the lumbar and thoracolumbar spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res (203):45–53

    Google Scholar 

  27. Weistroffer JK, Perra JH, Lonstein JE et al (2008) Complications in long fusions to the sacrum for adult scoliosis: minimum five-year analysis of fifty patients. Spine 33:1478–1483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Zheng Y, Lu WW, Zhu Q et al (2000) Variation in bone mineral density of the sacrum in young adults and its significance for sacral fixation. Spine 25:353–357

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Zindrick MR, Wiltse LL, Doornik A et al (1987) Analysis of the morphometric characteristics of the thoracic and lumbar pedicles. Spine 12:160–166

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Zindrick MR, Wiltse LL, Widell EH et al (1986) A biomechanical study of intrapeduncular screw fixation in the lumbosacral spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 203:99–112

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Todd McCall .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McCall, T., Fassett, D., Dailey, A. (2010). Sacral Screw Fixation. In: Patel, V., Burger, E., Brown, C. (eds) Spine Trauma. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03694-1_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03694-1_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-03693-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-03694-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics