Skip to main content

Identifying the Content Zones of German Court Decisions

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 37))

Abstract

A central step in the automatic processing of court decisions is the identification of the various content zones, i.e., breaking up the document into functionally independent areas. We assembled a corpus of German court decisions and argue that this genre belongs to the class of semi-structured text documents. Currently, we are implementing zone identification by means of a set of recognition rules, following up on our earlier experiences with a different genre (film reviews).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bieler, H., Dipper, S., Stede, M.: Identifying formal and functional zones in film reviews. In: Proceedings of the 8th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, Antwerpen (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dipper, S.: XML-based Stand-off Representation and Exploitation of Multi-Level Linguistic Annotation. In: Proc. of Berliner XML-Tage (BXML 2005), pp. 39–50 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hachey, B., Grover, C.: Extractive summarization of legal texts. Artificial Intelligence and Law 14, 305–345 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Miller, R.C.: Lightweight Structure in Text. PhD thesis, Computer Science Department, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University (May 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Moens, M.-F., Uyttendaele, C., Dumortier, J.: Abstracting of Legal Cases: The SALOMON Experience. In: Proc. of the 6th Int’l Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, Melbourne (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Teufel, S., Moens, M.: Summarizing Scientific Articles – Experiments with Relevance and Rhetorical Status. Computational Linguistics 28(4) (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Walter, S., Pinkal, M.: Linguistic support for legal ontology construction. In: Proceedings of ICAIL, pp. 242–243 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Stede, M., Bieler, H., Dipper, S., Suryiawongkul, A.: SUMMaR: Combining linguistics and statistics for text summarization. In: Proceedings of ECAI, Riva del Garda (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stede, M., Sauermann, A.: Linearization of arguments in commentary texts. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Multidisciplinary Approaches to Discourse, Oslo (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Stede, M., Kuhn, F. (2009). Identifying the Content Zones of German Court Decisions. In: Abramowicz, W., Flejter, D. (eds) Business Information Systems Workshops. BIS 2009. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 37. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03424-4_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03424-4_37

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-03423-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-03424-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics