The Issues Concerning the Application of Multiple Evaluation Methods for the Projects in Lithuanian Companies

  • Gerda Zigiene
  • Egle Fiodoroviene
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 37)


In this paper the methods for financial resource management related to project planning, its implementation and control reaching for goals set, are analyzed. The accomplished empirical research allowed to assess the implementation tendencies of evaluation methods for projects in Lithuania. The application of economical-financial evaluation methods, the methods of financial resource planning and budgeting in Lithuanian companies was determined, identifying the reasons for which these principles are kept or not and distinguishing their application problems as well.


principles of project management GANTT PERT CPM project evaluation methods project earned value 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Akalu, M.M., Turner, R.: Investment Appraisal Process in the Banking & Finance industry. A Case Study. Publications in the ERIM Report Series Research _ in Management ERIM Research Program: Organizing for Performance (2002),
  2. 2.
    Ammar, A., Berman, K., Amornsawadwatana, S.: A Review of Techniques for Risk Management in Projects. Benchmarking: An International Journal 14(1), 22–36 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anbari, F.T.: Earned Value Project Management Method and Extensions. Project Management Journal, 12–23 (December 2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aramvareekul, P., Seider, D.: Cost-Time-Risk Diagram: Project Planning and Management. Cost Engineering 48(11), 12–18 (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Christensen, D.S.: The Costs and Benefits of the Earned Value Management Process. College of Business, Southern Utah University (1998),
  6. 6.
    Danielson, M.G., Scott, J.A.: The Capital Budgeting Decisions of Small Businesses. Journal of Applied Finance (2006),
  7. 7.
    Dedi, L., Orsag, S.: Capital Budgeting Practices: A Survey of Croatian Firms (2007),
  8. 8.
    Finch, N.: The Motivations for Adopting Sustainability Disclosure. MGSM Working Paper No. -17 (2005),
  9. 9.
    Graham, J.R., Harvey, C.R.: The Theory and Practice of Corporate Finance: Evidence from the Field. Journal of Financial Economics 60, 187–243 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Judgev, K., Mathur, G.: Project Management Elements as Strategic Assets: Preliminary Findings. Journal: Management Research News 29(10), 604–617 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Koh, S.C.L., Simpson, M.: Could Enterprise Resource Planning Create a Competitive Advantage for Small Businesses? Benchmarking: An International Journal 14(1), 59–76 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Law, C.C.H., Ngai, E.W.T.: An Investigation of the Relationships Between Organizational Factors, Business Process Improvement, and ERP Success. Benchmarking: An International Journal 14(3), 387–406 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Locker, K., Gordon, J.: Project Management and Project Network Techniques. Financial Times, p. 272. Prentice Hall, Essex (2005) ISBN-13: 978-0273614548Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Loshi, P.L., Al-Mudhaki, J., Bremser, W.G.: Corporate Budget Planning, Control and Performance Evaluation ir Bahrain. Managerial Auditing Journal 18(9), 737–750 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Maccarone, P.: Organizing the Capital Budgeting Process in Large Firms. Management Decision 34(6), 43–56 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Marshal, R.A.: The Contribution of Earned Value Management to Project Success on Contracted Efforts: a Quantitative Statistics Approach within the Population of Experienced Practitioners. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business 1(2), 288–294 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Modell, M.E.: A Professional’s Guide to Systems Analysis, 2nd edn., p. 312. McGraw Hill, New York (1997), Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Oke, S.A., Charles-Owaba, O.E.: A Sensitivity Analysis of an Optimal Gantt Charting Maintenance Scheduling Model. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 23(2), 197–229 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Project Management Institute, Inc. Making Project Managment Indispensable for Business Results (2008),
  20. 20.
    Raby, M.: Project Management via Earned Value. Work study, pp. 6–10. MCB UP Ltd. (2000),
  21. 21.
    Romberg, D.: Project Managment Tools Cannot Guarantee Success. Computing Canada 24(42), 29 (1998)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Soderlund, J.: Developing Project Competence: Empirical Regularities in Competitive Project Operations. International Journal of Innovation Management 9(4), 451–480 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Stungurienė, S.: Solving Problems of Optimal use of Resources in Business Organizations: Practical Application Methods. Organizaciju̧ vadyba: sisteminiai tyrimai (2005), ISSN 1392-1142
  24. 24.
    Šaparnis, G., Merkys, G.: Kokybiniu̧ ir kiekybiniu̧metodu̧ derinimas mokyklinės vadybos diagnostikoje: hipotezė ir pirmieji rezultatai. Socialiniai mokslai: Kauno technologijos universitetas Nr. 2(23), 43–55 (2000)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tavares, L.V.: A Review of the Contribution of operational Research to Project Management. European Journal of Operational Research 136(1), 1–18 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    White, M.: Information Technology: A Mandatory Role in Construction Project Management. Cost Engineering 49, 18–20 (2007), Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerda Zigiene
    • 1
  • Egle Fiodoroviene
    • 2
  1. 1.Kaunas Faculty of Humanities, Department of Finance and Accounting, Asoc. Prof, PhDVilnius University 
  2. 2.Kaunas Faculty of Humanities, Department of Finance and Accounting, MasterVilnius University 

Personalised recommendations