Advertisement

The Importance of Infrastructures and Interaction Networks for Regional Competitiveness in the Knowledge Economy

Chapter
  • 453 Downloads
Part of the German Annual of Spatial Research and Policy book series (GERMANANNUAL)

Abstract

Economic processes, while not the sole influence on cities and regions, indisputably play a dominant role in their development. The change in economic structure and the accompanying spread of the knowledge economy are often discussed in relation to increasing spatial disparities, usually with an emphasis on metropolitan regions as being best equipped with the infrastructures necessary for the trade and transfer of, and access to knowledge. These include not only transport infrastructures, but especially telecommunication infrastructures and venues for transregional knowledge transfer, such as trade fairs, exhibitions and congresses that provide temporary spatial proximity. Because interaction relationships in the knowledge economy are based more on the transfer of knowledge than on the transport of goods, specific infrastructure facilities take on growing significance in terms of regional economic competitiveness. With the changing spatial-functional division of labour and sharing of knowledge, the relationship and interaction structures of the economy in space also undergo transformation.1 These structures and the infrastructure facilities they require are the focus of this paper.

Keywords

Service Provider Interaction Network Trade Fair Functional Specialisation Knowledge Economy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Antonelli, Cristiano; Quére, Michel (2002), The Governance of Interactive Learning within Innovation Systems, in: Urban Studies 39 (5-6), p 1051-1063Google Scholar
  2. Boschma, Ron (2005), Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment, in: Regional Studies 39 (1), p 61-74Google Scholar
  3. Breschi, Stefano; Lissoni, Francesco (2001), Knowledge Spillovers and Local Innovation Systems: A Critical Survey, in: Industrial and Corporate Change 10 (4), p 975-1005Google Scholar
  4. Duranton, Gilles; Puga, Diego (2003), From sectoral to functional Urban Specialisation, in: cepr Discussion Paper 2971Google Scholar
  5. Florida, Richard (2004), The Rise of the Creative Class: And How It’s Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life, New York: Basic Books, 2nd editionGoogle Scholar
  6. Grabher, Gernot (2002a), The Project Ecology of Advertising: Tasks, Talents and Teams, in: Regional Studies 36 (3), p 245-262Google Scholar
  7. Grabher, Gernot (2002b), Temporary Collaboration in Projects: Widening regional Trajectories? Paper from the workshop “Rethinking regional innovation and change: Path dependency or regional breakthrough?”, Stuttgart, Akademie für TechnikfolgenabschätzungGoogle Scholar
  8. Helbrecht, Ilse (1998), The Creative Metropolis, Services, Symbols, and Spaces, in: International Journal of Architectural Theory 3 (1)Google Scholar
  9. Helbrecht, Ilse (2005), Geographisches Kapital − Das Fundament der kreativen Metropolis, in: Kujath, Hans Joachim (ed.), Knoten im Netz − Beiträge zur neuen Rolle der Metropolregionen in der Dienstleistungswirtschaft und Wissensökonomie, Münster, Hamburg, Berlin, Wien, London, LIT-Verlag, p 121-155Google Scholar
  10. ISI/ NIW (2005), Zur technologischen Leistungsfähigkeit Deutschlands 2005, BonnGoogle Scholar
  11. Jähnke, Petra; Wolke, Manuela (2005), Berlin und München − Metropolregionen als vernetzte Informationsdienstleistungsstandorte?, in: Kujath, Hans Joachim (ed.), Knoten im Netz − Beiträge zur neuen Rolle der Metropolregionen in der Dienstleistungswirtschaft und Wissensökonomie, Münster, Hamburg, Berlin, Wien, London, LIT-Verlag, p 245-284Google Scholar
  12. Jansen, Dorothea (2004), Networks, Social Capital and Knowledge Production, Speyer, Forschungsinstitut für Öffentliche Verwaltung SpeyerGoogle Scholar
  13. Kräkel, Matthias (2004), Organisation und Management, TübingenGoogle Scholar
  14. Kujath, Hans Joachim; Schmidt, Suntje (2007), Wissensökonomie und die Entwicklung von Städtesystemen, in: soFid − Fachinformationsdienst 2007 (2), p 9-29Google Scholar
  15. Legler, Harald; Gehrke, Birgit; Krawczyk, Olaf (2005), Deutschlands forschungs- und wissensintensive Wirtschaftszweige: Spezialisierung, Wachstum, Beschäftigung und Qualifikationserfordernisse, in: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) (ed.), Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem, Berlin, NIW − Niedersächsisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (Lower Saxony Institute for Economic Research)Google Scholar
  16. OECD (1996), The Knowledge-Based Economy, in: General Distribution OECD 96 (102)Google Scholar
  17. Schmidt, Suntje; Wolke, Manuela (2004), Thesen zur organisatorischen und räumlichen Ordnung wissensbasierter Dienstleistungen − Berlin und München im Vergleich, in: Matthiesen, Ulf (ed.), Stadtregion und Wissen, Analysen und Plädoyers für eine wissensbasierte Stadtpolitik, Wiesbaden, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, p 123-147Google Scholar
  18. Schmidt, Suntje; Wolke, Manuela (2007), Regional vs. Inter-Regional Networks − The Importance of Technical Infrastructures and Interaction Networks for the Regional Competitiveness in the Knowledge Economy, Presentation at the EUGEO − Conference: Workshop Session “Standort Europa” at Risk in Amsterdam, 20 August 2007Google Scholar
  19. Schmidt, Suntje; Wolke, Manuela (2008), Knowledge Economic Specialisation of Regions as development Potentials, Regional Studies Association International Conference − Regions: The Dilemmas of Integration and Competition, Prague, RSA, available at: http://www.regional-studies-assoc.ac.uk/events/prague08/papers/Schmidt.pdf
  20. Stein, Rolf (2002), Producer Services, Transaction Activities, and Cities: Rethinking Occupational Categories in Economic Geography, in: European Planning Studies 10 (6), p 723-743Google Scholar
  21. Stein, Rolf (2003), Economic Specialisation in Metropolitan Areas revisited: Transactional Occupations in Hamburg, Germany, in: Urban Studies 40 (11), p 2187-2205Google Scholar
  22. Van Winden, Willem (2006), Small and medium sized cities in the knowledge based Economy: Challenges and policy options, Lecture delivered in Magdeburg, 18 October 2005, at the Congress IBA Stadtumbau Sachsen-Anhalt in Magdeburg, 17-19 October 2005, available at: http://www.euricur.nl/content_assets/Micro- soft%2Word%20-%20LezingMagdeburg.pdf
  23. Wolke, Manuela; Schmidt, Suntje (2004), Berlin und München als Standorte wissensintensiver Dienstleister-Verflechtungen, Interaktionsstrukturen und metropolitane Standortanforderungen, in: Matthiesen, Ulf (ed.), Stadtregion und Wissen −Analysen und Plädoyers für eine wissensbasierte Stadtpolitik, Wiesbaden, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, p 123-147Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Leibniz Institute for Regional Development and Structural Planning (IRS)ErknerGermany

Personalised recommendations