Abstract
It is not easy to say something after the excellent paper presented by Helmut Aust if you have only a time of ten minutes allotted to you. However, I shall try to pick up a few problems connected with our topic. I share the view of Helmut Aust that we should concentrate on problems of State responsibility in connection with the use of force, or in other words the threat to or breach of the peace. However, we should not forget that a developed system of state responsibility clearly contributes to the rule of law in the international legal order and can thereby already be seen as an important element of world order and world peace. This has been rightly underlined by Helmut Aust. I would have no hesitation to welcome peace entering through the back-door.
Let me concentrate on the following issues: State responsibility in connection with post-conflict peace building, State responsibility and selfdefense, State responsibility and International organisations and lastly responsibility and obligations erga omnes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Frowein, J.A. (2009). Comment: State Responsibility and Peace. In: Nolte, G. (eds) Peace through International Law. Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht, vol 211. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03380-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03380-3_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-03381-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-03380-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawLaw and Criminology (R0)