Abstract
The first part of this paper briefly discusses the relationship between environmental law and international security, the notion of shared resources as a potential cause for international conflicts and international law applicable to the management of shared groundwater resources (II.). As a second step two core questions relating to the ILC Draft Law on Transboundary Aquifers2 and peace through law are elaborated upon (III.): Why legal regulation? Why the legal regulation the ILC has adopted? Furthermore, this paper goes on to examine two topics excluded from the ILC’s draft: water resources which are “not-shared” between States and dispute settlement (IV.). Finally, some conclusions on the effectiveness of a framework for peace concerning transboundary aquifers are drawn (V.).
The author is grateful to Clemens Feinäugle and Sarah Wolf for their assistance with providing relevant materials and to Helmut Aust and Prof. Dr. Alexander Proelß for their valuable comments on an earlier version of this paper.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Matz-Lück, N. (2009). The Benefits of Positivism: The ILC’s Contribution to the Peaceful Sharing of Transboundary Groundwater. In: Nolte, G. (eds) Peace through International Law. Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht, vol 211. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03380-3_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03380-3_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-03381-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-03380-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawLaw and Criminology (R0)