Skip to main content

Formalizing the Logic-Automaton Connection

  • Conference paper
Theorem Proving in Higher Order Logics (TPHOLs 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 5674))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper presents a formalization of a library for automata on bit strings in the theorem prover Isabelle/HOL. It forms the basis of a reflection-based decision procedure for Presburger arithmetic, which is efficiently executable thanks to Isabelle’s code generator. With this work, we therefore provide a mechanized proof of the well-known connection between logic and automata theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Basin, D., Friedrich, S.: Combining WS1S and HOL. In: Gabbay, D., de Rijke, M. (eds.) Frontiers of Combining Systems 2. Studies in Logic and Computation, vol. 7, pp. 39–56. Research Studies Press/Wiley (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berghofer, S., Nipkow, T.: Executing higher order logic. In: Callaghan, P., Luo, Z., McKinna, J., Pollack, R. (eds.) TYPES 2000. LNCS, vol. 2277, p. 24. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Boudet, A., Comon, H.: Diophantine equations, Presburger arithmetic and finite automata. In: Kirchner, H. (ed.) CAAP 1996. LNCS, vol. 1059, pp. 30–43. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Boutin, S.: Using reflection to build efficient and certified decision procedures. In: Ito, T., Abadi, M. (eds.) TACS 1997. LNCS, vol. 1281, pp. 515–529. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Chaieb, A., Nipkow, T.: Proof synthesis and reflection for linear arithmetic. Journal of Automated Reasoning 41, 33–59 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Constable, R.L., Jackson, P.B., Naumov, P., Uribe, J.: Constructively formalizing automata theory. In: Plotkin, G., Stirling, C., Tofte, M. (eds.) Proof, Language, and Interaction: Essays in Honor of Robin Milner. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Harrison, J.: Metatheory and reflection in theorem proving: A survey and critique. Technical Report CRC-053, SRI Cambridge (1995), http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/users/jrh/papers/reflect.dvi.gz

  8. Klarlund, N.: Mona & Fido: The logic-automaton connection in practice. In: Nielsen, M. (ed.) CSL 1997. LNCS, vol. 1414, pp. 311–326. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Krauss, A.: Partial recursive functions in higher-order logic. In: Furbach, U., Shankar, N. (eds.) IJCAR 2006. LNCS, vol. 4130, pp. 589–603. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Minamide, Y.: Verified decision procedures on context-free grammars. In: Schneider, K., Brandt, J. (eds.) TPHOLs 2007. LNCS, vol. 4732, pp. 173–188. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Nipkow, T.: Verified lexical analysis. In: Grundy, J., Newey, M. (eds.) TPHOLs 1998. LNCS, vol. 1479, pp. 1–15. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Nipkow, T.: Linear quantifier elimination. In: Armando, A., Baumgartner, P., Dowek, G. (eds.) IJCAR 2008. LNCS, vol. 5195, pp. 18–33. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Nishihara, T., Minamide, Y.: Depth first search. In: Klein, G., Nipkow, T., Paulson, L. (eds.) The Archive of Formal Proofs, http://afp.sf.net/entries/Depth-First-Search.shtml (June 2004); Formal proof development

  14. Verma, K.N., Goubault-Larrecq, J., Prasad, S., Arun-Kumar, S.: Reflecting BDDs in Coq. In: He, J., Sato, M. (eds.) ASIAN 2000. LNCS, vol. 1961, pp. 162–181. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Wolper, P., Boigelot, B.: On the construction of automata from linear arithmetic constraints. In: Schwartzbach, M.I., Graf, S. (eds.) TACAS 2000. LNCS, vol. 1785, pp. 1–19. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Berghofer, S., Reiter, M. (2009). Formalizing the Logic-Automaton Connection. In: Berghofer, S., Nipkow, T., Urban, C., Wenzel, M. (eds) Theorem Proving in Higher Order Logics. TPHOLs 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5674. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03359-9_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03359-9_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-03358-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-03359-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics