Fairness in Cooperating Multi-agent Systems – Using Profit Sharing as an Example
- 407 Downloads
Distributing profit in a coalition of multiple cooperating agents  is an important issue in both multi-agent and economics society. Proposed in 1953, Shapley value scheme with its elegant axiomatic derivation is essential to solution concepts for profit sharing. However, Shapley value scheme did not cover fairness issues. A new scheme of profit sharing with fairness awareness is proposed in this work. Axioms considering both fairness and efficiency issues are included in the new scheme. An algorithm is constructed for calculation of profit sharing under this new scheme. The existence of a solution existence and other properties of this algorithm are discussed.
KeywordsMarginal Contribution Level Index Profit Sharing Total Reward Partial Order Relation
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Rabin, M.: Incorporating Fairness into Game Theory and Economics. The American Economic Review 83(5) (December 1993)Google Scholar
- 2.Fehr, E., Schmidt, K.M.: A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics (August 1999)Google Scholar
- 4.Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J.L.: Thaler R. H. Fairness and the Assumption of Fairness. The Journal of Business 59(5), Part 2 (October 1986)Google Scholar
- 5.Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J.L., Thaler, R.H.: Fairness as a Constraint on Profit Seeking: Entitlements in the Market. The American Economic Review 76(4), 728–741 (1986)Google Scholar
- 6.Woodroof, J.B., Kasper, G.M.: A Synthesis of Equity, Expectation, and Needs Theories as a Conceptual Foundation for the User Satisfaction Construct in Information Systems Research. In: Proceedings of the 1995 ACM SIGCPR Conference on Supporting teams, Groups, and Learning Inside and Outside the IS Function Reinventing IS, pp. 253–254 (1995)Google Scholar
- 12.Harsanyi, J.C.: The Shapley Value and the Risk Dominance Solutions of Two Bargaining Models for Characteristic-Function Games. Essays in Game Theory and Mathematical Economics, 43–68 (1985)Google Scholar
- 16.Shapley, L.S.: A Value for N-Person Games. In: Kuhn, H.W., Tucker, A.W. (eds.) Contributions to the Theory of Games II. Annals of Mathematics Studies, vol. 28, pp. 307–317. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1953)Google Scholar
- 17.Shapley, L.S.: A Comparison of Power Indices and a Non-symmetric Generalization. P-5872, The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA (1953)Google Scholar
- 19.Young, H.P.: Cost Allocation. In: Aumann, R.J., Hart, S. (eds.) The Handbook of Game Theory, vol. II, pp. 1193–1235. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1994)Google Scholar