Abstract
The RGA introduced in chapter 2 provides a powerful tool for measuring control loop interaction and it is a well established pairing technique in the industry, with decades of successful applications. Although, the presented RGA analysis is sufficient for many practical problems, it is for some cases necessary to extend the RGA concept to handle certain shortcomings. This chapter provides an overview of the advanced pairing techniques based on the different RGA extensions. The presented methodologies are:
The Dynamic Relative Gain Array. Dynamic relative gain is discussed in section 3.2.1. This is a dynamic extension of the RGA to improve the pairing capabilities of the steady state RGA in the cases where the RGA changes substantially with frequency and especially when the steady state RGA differs from the RGA at other key frequencies. In section 3.2.2, among the many different approaches, the static output feedback linear quadratic regulator problem strategy is chosen to develop the RGA dynamic extension. The Effective Relative Gain Array is another dynamic extension of the RGA presented in section 3.2.3, where the steady state gain and the response speed or plant bandwidth of the open loop transfer function are considered. Its key difference with the other RGA dynamic extensions is that no controller design or complex computations are necessary.
The Partial Relative Gain. The RGA in cases where selected loops are closed in a control system can lead to incorrect pairing selections. In fact, partially controlled plants can improve the designer’s knowledge of the plant under control. By investigating the relative gains of the uncontrolled part of the plant or the PRG, better pairing selections can be made. The notion of PRG is developed in section 3.3.
The Relative Interaction Array. Section 3.4 introduces the relative interaction array (RIA). It is similar to the RGA and is defined based on individual control loops and it can only measure interaction in individual loops. The interaction measure provided by the RGA and the RIA can lead to several pairs that may satisfy the pairing rules and are unable to propose the best choice. However, an overall interaction measure is defined along with the RIA which claims to lead to the best input-output pairing selection.
Block Pairing and Block Relative Gain. Fully decentralized control of highly interactive multivariable plants can result in poor closed loop performance. On the other hand, centralized controllers are not operationally desirable in certain complex multivariable plants where interaction is not heavily distributed through the plant and it is sever in some parts and less disturbing in the others. An effective design methodology in such cases is the block decentralized controllers. Block pairing discussed in section 3.5 is the first step in a successful block decentralized control system design.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Arkun, Y.: Dynamic block relative gain and its connection with the performance and stability of decentralized control structure. Int. J. Control 46, 1187–1193 (1987)
Arkun, Y.: Relative sensitivity: a dynamic closed-loop interaction measure and design tool. AIChE J. 34, 672–675 (1988)
Bristol, E.: Recent results on interactions in multivariable process control. In: Proceeding of the 71st Annual AIChE meeting, Houston, TX, USA (1979)
Chen, J.: Relations between block relative gain and Euclidean condition number. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 37, 127–129 (1992)
Gagnepain, J.P., Seborg, D.E.: Analysis of process interactions with application to multiloop control system design. Ind. Eng. Chem. Proc. Des. Dev. 21, 5–11 (1982)
Grosdidier, P., Morari, M.: Interaction measures for systems under decentralized control. Automatica 22, 309–319 (1986)
Haggblom, K.E.: Control Structure Analysis by Partial Relative Gains. In: Proceeding of the 36th Conference on Decision and Control, San Diego, California, USA (1997a)
Haggblom, K.E.: Partial relative gain: a new tool for control structure selection. In: AIChE Annual Meeting, November 16-21 (1997b)
Hovd, M., Skogestad, S.: Simple frequency-dependent tools for control system analysis, structure selection and design. Automatica 28, 989–996 (1992)
Huang, H.P., Ohshima, M., Hashimoto, I.: Dynamic interaction and multiloop control system design. J. Process Contr. 4, 15–27 (1994)
Kariwala, V., Forbes, J.F., Meadows, E.S.: Block relative gain: properties, and pairing rules. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 42, 4564–4574 (2003)
Kariwala, V., Forbes, J.F., Meadows, E.S.: Integrity of systems under decentralized integral control. Automatica 41, 1575–1581 (2005)
Kariwala, V., Forbes, J.F., Skogestad, S.: [graphics object to be inserted manually]-Interaction measure for unstable systems. Int. J. Automation and Control 1, 295–313 (2007)
Levine, W., Athans, M.: On the determination of the optimal constant feedback gains for linear multivariable systems. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 15, 44–48 (1970)
Lewis, F.L.: Applied Optimal Control & Estimation. Prentice Hall, New Jersey (1992)
Manousiouthakis, V., Arkun, Y.: A Hybrid Approach for the Design of Robust Control Systems. Int. J. Control 45, 2203–2220 (1987)
McAvoy, T.J.: Some results on dynamic interaction analysis of complex control systems. Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev. 22, 42–49 (1983)
McAvoy, T., Arkun, Y., Chen, R., Robinson, D., Schnelle, P.D.: A new approach to defining a dynamic relative gain. Control Eng. Pract. 11, 907–914 (2003)
Mijares, G., Cole, C.D., Naugle, N.W., Preisig, H.A., Holland, C.D.: A new criterion for the pairing of control and manipulated variables. AIChE J. 32, 1439–1449 (1986)
Morari, M.: Operability Measures for Process Design. Ind. Chem. Eng. Symposium Series, 131–140 (1982)
Nett, C.N., Manousiouthakis, V.: Euclidean condition and block relative gain: connections, conjectures, and clarifications. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 32, 405–407 (1987)
Reeves, D.E., Arkun, Y.: Interaction measures for non-square decentralized control structures. AIChE J. 35, 603–613 (1989)
Shinskey, F.: Process Control Systems, ch. 7. McGraw-Hill, New York (1967)
Tung, L.S., Edgar, T.F.: Analysis of control-output interactions in dynamic systems. AIChE J. 27, 690–693 (1981)
Witcher, M.F., McAvoy, T.J.: Interacting control systems: steady-state and dynamic measurement of interaction. ISA T l6, 35–41 (1977)
Xiong, Q., Cai, W.-J.: Effective transfer function method for decentralized control system design on multi-input multi-output processes. J. Process Contr. 16, 773–784 (2006)
Xiong, Q., Cai, W.-J., He, M.J.: A practical loop pairing criterion for multivariable processes. J. Process Contr. 15, 741–747 (2005)
Zhu, Z.X., Jutan, A.: A new variable pairing criterion based on Niederlinski index. Chem. Eng. Commun. 121, 235–250 (1993)
Zhu, Z.X.: Variable pairing selection based on individual and overall interaction measures. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 35, 4091–4099 (1996)
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Khaki-Sedigh, A., Moaveni, B. (2009). Control Configuration of Linear Multivariable Plants: Advanced RGA Based Techniques. In: Control Configuration Selection for Multivariable Plants. Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, vol 391. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03193-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03193-9_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-03192-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-03193-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)