Skip to main content

Control Configuration of Linear Multivariable Plants: Advanced RGA Based Techniques

  • Chapter
Control Configuration Selection for Multivariable Plants

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences ((LNCIS,volume 391))

  • 918 Accesses

Abstract

The RGA introduced in chapter 2 provides a powerful tool for measuring control loop interaction and it is a well established pairing technique in the industry, with decades of successful applications. Although, the presented RGA analysis is sufficient for many practical problems, it is for some cases necessary to extend the RGA concept to handle certain shortcomings. This chapter provides an overview of the advanced pairing techniques based on the different RGA extensions. The presented methodologies are:

The Dynamic Relative Gain Array. Dynamic relative gain is discussed in section 3.2.1. This is a dynamic extension of the RGA to improve the pairing capabilities of the steady state RGA in the cases where the RGA changes substantially with frequency and especially when the steady state RGA differs from the RGA at other key frequencies. In section 3.2.2, among the many different approaches, the static output feedback linear quadratic regulator problem strategy is chosen to develop the RGA dynamic extension. The Effective Relative Gain Array is another dynamic extension of the RGA presented in section 3.2.3, where the steady state gain and the response speed or plant bandwidth of the open loop transfer function are considered. Its key difference with the other RGA dynamic extensions is that no controller design or complex computations are necessary.

The Partial Relative Gain. The RGA in cases where selected loops are closed in a control system can lead to incorrect pairing selections. In fact, partially controlled plants can improve the designer’s knowledge of the plant under control. By investigating the relative gains of the uncontrolled part of the plant or the PRG, better pairing selections can be made. The notion of PRG is developed in section 3.3.

The Relative Interaction Array. Section 3.4 introduces the relative interaction array (RIA). It is similar to the RGA and is defined based on individual control loops and it can only measure interaction in individual loops. The interaction measure provided by the RGA and the RIA can lead to several pairs that may satisfy the pairing rules and are unable to propose the best choice. However, an overall interaction measure is defined along with the RIA which claims to lead to the best input-output pairing selection.

Block Pairing and Block Relative Gain. Fully decentralized control of highly interactive multivariable plants can result in poor closed loop performance. On the other hand, centralized controllers are not operationally desirable in certain complex multivariable plants where interaction is not heavily distributed through the plant and it is sever in some parts and less disturbing in the others. An effective design methodology in such cases is the block decentralized controllers. Block pairing discussed in section 3.5 is the first step in a successful block decentralized control system design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arkun, Y.: Dynamic block relative gain and its connection with the performance and stability of decentralized control structure. Int. J. Control 46, 1187–1193 (1987)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Arkun, Y.: Relative sensitivity: a dynamic closed-loop interaction measure and design tool. AIChE J. 34, 672–675 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bristol, E.: Recent results on interactions in multivariable process control. In: Proceeding of the 71st Annual AIChE meeting, Houston, TX, USA (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J.: Relations between block relative gain and Euclidean condition number. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 37, 127–129 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagnepain, J.P., Seborg, D.E.: Analysis of process interactions with application to multiloop control system design. Ind. Eng. Chem. Proc. Des. Dev. 21, 5–11 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosdidier, P., Morari, M.: Interaction measures for systems under decentralized control. Automatica 22, 309–319 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haggblom, K.E.: Control Structure Analysis by Partial Relative Gains. In: Proceeding of the 36th Conference on Decision and Control, San Diego, California, USA (1997a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggblom, K.E.: Partial relative gain: a new tool for control structure selection. In: AIChE Annual Meeting, November 16-21 (1997b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovd, M., Skogestad, S.: Simple frequency-dependent tools for control system analysis, structure selection and design. Automatica 28, 989–996 (1992)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, H.P., Ohshima, M., Hashimoto, I.: Dynamic interaction and multiloop control system design. J. Process Contr. 4, 15–27 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kariwala, V., Forbes, J.F., Meadows, E.S.: Block relative gain: properties, and pairing rules. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 42, 4564–4574 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kariwala, V., Forbes, J.F., Meadows, E.S.: Integrity of systems under decentralized integral control. Automatica 41, 1575–1581 (2005)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kariwala, V., Forbes, J.F., Skogestad, S.: [graphics object to be inserted manually]-Interaction measure for unstable systems. Int. J. Automation and Control 1, 295–313 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, W., Athans, M.: On the determination of the optimal constant feedback gains for linear multivariable systems. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 15, 44–48 (1970)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, F.L.: Applied Optimal Control & Estimation. Prentice Hall, New Jersey (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Manousiouthakis, V., Arkun, Y.: A Hybrid Approach for the Design of Robust Control Systems. Int. J. Control 45, 2203–2220 (1987)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • McAvoy, T.J.: Some results on dynamic interaction analysis of complex control systems. Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev. 22, 42–49 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAvoy, T., Arkun, Y., Chen, R., Robinson, D., Schnelle, P.D.: A new approach to defining a dynamic relative gain. Control Eng. Pract. 11, 907–914 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mijares, G., Cole, C.D., Naugle, N.W., Preisig, H.A., Holland, C.D.: A new criterion for the pairing of control and manipulated variables. AIChE J. 32, 1439–1449 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morari, M.: Operability Measures for Process Design. Ind. Chem. Eng. Symposium Series, 131–140 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nett, C.N., Manousiouthakis, V.: Euclidean condition and block relative gain: connections, conjectures, and clarifications. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 32, 405–407 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, D.E., Arkun, Y.: Interaction measures for non-square decentralized control structures. AIChE J. 35, 603–613 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shinskey, F.: Process Control Systems, ch. 7. McGraw-Hill, New York (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tung, L.S., Edgar, T.F.: Analysis of control-output interactions in dynamic systems. AIChE J. 27, 690–693 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witcher, M.F., McAvoy, T.J.: Interacting control systems: steady-state and dynamic measurement of interaction. ISA T l6, 35–41 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiong, Q., Cai, W.-J.: Effective transfer function method for decentralized control system design on multi-input multi-output processes. J. Process Contr. 16, 773–784 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong, Q., Cai, W.-J., He, M.J.: A practical loop pairing criterion for multivariable processes. J. Process Contr. 15, 741–747 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Z.X., Jutan, A.: A new variable pairing criterion based on Niederlinski index. Chem. Eng. Commun. 121, 235–250 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Z.X.: Variable pairing selection based on individual and overall interaction measures. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 35, 4091–4099 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Khaki-Sedigh, A., Moaveni, B. (2009). Control Configuration of Linear Multivariable Plants: Advanced RGA Based Techniques. In: Control Configuration Selection for Multivariable Plants. Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, vol 391. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03193-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03193-9_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-03192-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-03193-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics