Summary
We study a multi-issue negotiation problem where agents have private information concerning their preferences over the issues. The ignorance of agents regarding the actual solution space makes it difficult for them to come to an agreement that is both fair and efficient. To make such negotiations easier, we propose a framework that employs a third-party to act as a mediator that will guide agents towards equitable solutions on the efficient frontier. To achieve this, our mediator combines the declarations of agents into a coherent negotiation protocol that dampens the desire of agents to lie and encourages them to explore regions of the solution space that are efficient and profitable for both parties.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Kraus, S.: Strategic negotiation in multiagent systems. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2001)
Rosenschein, J., Zlotkin, G.: Rules of Encounter. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)
Gatti, N., Di Giunta, F., Marino, S.: Alternating-offers bargaining with one-sided uncertain deadlines: an efficient algorithm. Artificial Intelligence 172, 1119–1157 (2008)
Lin, R., Kraus, S., Wilkenfeld, J., Barry, J.: Negotiating with bounded rational agents in environments with incomplete information using an automated agent. Articial Intelligence 172, 823–851 (2008)
Osborne, M.J., Rubinstein, A.: Bargaining and Markets. Academic Press, San Diego (1990)
Fatima, S.S., Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N.R.: Multi-issue negotiation with deadlines. Artificial Intelligence Research 27, 381–417 (2006)
Klein, M., Faratin, P., Sayama, H., Bar-Yam, Y.: Negotiating complex contracts. IEEE Intelligent Systems 8(6), 32–38 (2003)
Raiffa, H.: The Art and Science of Negotiation. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1982)
Myerson, R.B., Satterthwaite, M.A.: Efficient mechanisms for bilateral trading. Economic Theory 29, 265–281 (1983)
Pratt, J.W., Zeckhauser, R.: Multidimensional bargains and the desirability of ex post inefficiency. Risk and Uncertainty 5, 205–216 (1992)
Bartal, Y., Gonen, R., Mura, P.L.: Negotiation-range mechanisms: Exploring the limits of truthful efficient markets. In: EC 2004: Proceedings of the 5th ACM conference on Electronic commerce, pp. 1–8 (2004)
Nash, J.: The bargaining problem. Econometrica 18, 155–162 (1950)
Weber, T., Bapna, A.: Bayesian incentive compatible parameterization of mechanisms. Journal of Mathematical Economics 44(3-4), 394–403 (2008)
John, R., Raith, M.G.: Strategic step-by-step negotiation. Economics 70(2), 127–154 (1999)
John, R., Raith, M.G.: Optimizing multi-stage negotiations. Economic Behavior and Organization 45(2), 155–173 (2001)
Fershtman, C.: The importance of the agenda in bargaining. Games and Economic Behavior 2, 224–238 (1990)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shew, J., Larson, K. (2009). The Blind Leading the Blind: A Third-Party Model for Bilateral Multi-issue Negotiations under Incomplete Information. In: Ito, T., Zhang, M., Robu, V., Fatima, S., Matsuo, T. (eds) Advances in Agent-Based Complex Automated Negotiations. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 233. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03190-8_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03190-8_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-03189-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-03190-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)