Advertisement

The Time-Dependent Schrödinger Equation Revisited: Quantum Optical and Classical Maxwell Routes to Schrödinger’s Wave Equation

  • Marlan O. ScullyEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Physics book series (LNP, volume 789)

Abstract

In a previous paper [1–3] we presented quantum field theoretical and classical (Hamilton–Jacobi) routes to the time-dependent Schrödinger’s equation (TDSE) in which the time t and position r are regarded as parameters, not operators. From this perspective, the time in quantum mechanics is argued as being the same as the time in Newtonian mechanics. We here provide a parallel argument, based on the photon wave function, showing that the time in quantum mechanics is the same as the time in Maxwell equations.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank R. Arnowitt, C. Summerfield, and S. Weinberg for useful and stimulating discussions. This work was supported by the Robert A. Welch Foundation grant number A-126 and the ONR award number N00014-07-1-1084.

References

  1. 1.
    M. Scully, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 99, 012019 (2008)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wilhelm and Else Heraeus-Seminar (no. 395) in Honor of Prof. M. Kleber (Blaubeuren, Germany, Sept 2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    K. Chapin, M. Scully, M.S. Zubairy, in Frontiers of Quantum and Mesoscopic Thermodynamics Proceedings (28 July–2 August 2008), Physica E, to be publishedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Scully, M.S. Zubiary, Quantum Optics (Cambridge Press, Cambridge, 1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. Weinberg, The Quantum Theory of Fields I (Cambridge Press, Cambridge, 2005)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. Schweber, An Introduction to Relativistic Quantum Field Theory (Harper and Row, New York, 1962)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. Good, T. Nelson, Classical Theory of Electric and Magnetic Fields (Academic Press, New York, 1971)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. Oppenheimer, Phys. Rev. 38, 725 (1931)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Scully, in Advances in Quantum Phenonema, E. Beltrametti, J.-M. Lévy-Leblond (eds.) (Plenum Press, New York, 1995)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    H. Kramers, Quantum Mechanics (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1958)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    E.C.G. Sudarshan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10, 277 (1963)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Texas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA
  2. 2.Princeton UniversityPrincetonUSA

Personalised recommendations