Skip to main content

Abstract

Recreation planning in context with conservation planning Sveaskog’s Ecoparks , Sweden (Rydberg), see box 1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahlström, I. (2005): Friluftsliv i tätort. Del 2. Underlag för friluftsplan. Exemplet Järvafältet. Länsstyrelsen i Stockholms Län, Rapport 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ammer, U. (1983): Erholung und Landschaft – haben wir des Guten zu viel getan? Forstwiss. Centralblatt, 102(4), 217–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ammer, U. and Pröbstl, U. (1991): Freizeit und Natur, Probleme und Lösungsmöglichkeiten einer ökologisch verträglichen Freizeitnutzung. Pareys Studientexte 72, Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, R. and Rydberg, D. (2005): Naturen och hälsan. Skogsstyrelsens Förlag, Jönköping.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon. (2005): Recreation Policy – Healthy Forest, Healthy Nation. Coillte Teoranta – Irish Forestry Board, Ireland. Availabe at http://www.coillte.ie/publications.

  • Arnberger, A. and Haider, W. (2005): Social effects on crowding preferences of urban forest visitors. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 3(3–4), 125–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnberger, A. and Haider, W. (2007): Would you displace? It depends! A multivariate visual approach to intended displacement from an urban forest trail. Journal of Leisure Research, 39(2), 345–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayrische Landesanstalt für Land- und Forstwirtschaft (LWF) (2004): Waldfläche und Besitzverhältnisse, URL: http://2004.lwf.bayern.de/lwfaktuell/lwfakt17/17akt_3.htm, accessed on 07 July 2005.

  • Bell, S. (1997): Design for Outdoor Recreation. Spon Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, S. (2007): Design for Outdoor Recreation (Second Edition). Taylor and Francis, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, S. Simpson, M., Tyrväinen, L., Sievänen, T. and Pröbstl, U. (2009): European Forest Recreation and Tourism. A handbook. Taylor and Francis, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, S., Tyrväinen, L., Sievänen, T., Pröbstl, U. and Simpson, M. (2007): Outdoor Recreation and Nature Tourism: A European Perspective, Living Rev. Landscape Res. 1, URL (cited on 18 January 2008): http://www.livingreviews.org/lrlr-2007-2.

  • BfN – Bundesamt für Naturschutz (2004): Freiwillige Vereinbarungen Naturschutz Natursport, Ein Leitfaden, BfN-Skripten 106, Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breman, P. (2004): Verbal information, COST E33 Edinburgh meeting in November 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • BMLFUW – Bundesministerium für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Umwelt und Wasserwirtschaft (2005): Nachhaltige Waldwirtschaft in Österreich. Österreichischer Waldbericht 2004, Wien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borch, W.F. von der (1824): Die Ästhetik im Walde. Sylvan. Jahrb. für Forstmänner, Heidelberg, Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, J. and Vejre, H. (2003): Multifunctional landscapes: motives, concepts and perceptions. In: Brandt, J. and Vejre, H. (eds), Multifunctional Landscapes: Volume I: Theory, Values and History. WIT Press, Southhampton, pp. 3–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, R. (2007): Adventure tourism products: price, duration, size, skill, remoteness. Tourism Management, 28(6), 1428–1433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bundesministerium für Verbraucherschutz, Ernährung und Landwirtschaft (2005): Bundeswaldinventur, URL: http://www.bundeswaldinventur.de/enid/4f.html, accessed on 07 July 2005.

  • BUWAL (2004): Waldprogramm Schweiz (WAP-CH) – Handlungsprogramm 2004–2015. Bern, Bundesamt für Umwelt Wald und Landschaft BUWAL.

    Google Scholar 

  • BUWAL (2005): Der monetäre Erholungswert des Waldes. Econcept im Auftrag des BUWAL. Umweltmaterialien Nr. 193. Bern.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Council of Forest Ministers (CCFM) (2003): Defining sustainable forest management in Canada – criteria and indicators, http://www.ccfm.org/current/ccitf_e.php (accessed 21.11.2006)

  • Caspersen, O.H. and Olafsson, A.S. (2006): Oplevelsesværdier og det grønne håndtryk. By og landsplanserien. En metode til kortlægning og udvikling af frilufts oplevelser i Hovedstadsregionen.Center for Skov, Landskab og Planlægning. Landskabsplanserien nr. 27. KVL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. and Stankey, G. (1997): The Recreation Opportunity Spectrum: A Framework for Planning, Management, and Research. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service. Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. General Technical Report. PNW-98 December 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, D.N. and Monz, C.A. (2002): Trampling disturbance of high-elevation vegetation, Wind River Mountains, Wyoming, USA. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research, 34, 365–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, D., Watson, A., Hall, T. and Spildie, D. (1997): High use Destinations in Wilderness: Social and Bio-Physical Impacts, Visitor Responses and Management Options. USDA Forestry Service Research Paper INT.496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dales, B. (2004): “New access rights and responsibilities in Scotland”, conference paper. Related online version (cited on 07 May 2007): http://www.openspace.eca.ac.uk/costE33/outputs_scotland.htm

  • Deutscher Rat für Landespflege (2004): Der Beitrag der Waldwirtschaft zum Aufbau eines länderübergreifenden Biotopverbundes, in: Schriftenreihe des Deutschen Rats für Landespflege, Heft 76, S. 5–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitz, L. von (1909): Entwicklung und praktische Ziele der Forstästhetik. Österr. Vjschr. Forstwes., 59(NF27), 115–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Directorate for Nature Management (2003): ‘Marka’ – Planlegging av by- og tettstedsnære naturomrder (Planning in urban and community forests and nature areas). Handbook 24. Trondheim, Norway

    Google Scholar 

  • Directorate for Nature Management (2006): Naturvennlig tilrettelegging for friluftsliv Handbook 27. Trondhiem, Norway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elands, B. en Lengkeek, J. (2000): Typical tourists – research into the theoretical and methodological foundations of a typology of tourism and recreation experiences. Mansholt Studies 21, Wageningen University, Wageningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elands, B. en van Koppen, K. (2007): Indicators for the ‘Convention on Biodiversity 2010’; public awareness and participation. WOt-werkdocument 53.12, Wageningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felbermeier, B. (2009): Waldbauliche Handlungsmöglichkeiten angesichts des Klimawandels. Vortrag auf der Taugung, Naturpark und Wald, Neuberg an der Mürz, 07 May 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferenc, G. (1996): State Forest Management in the Transition Period from Planned Economy to Market Directed One IUFRO-95, Papers and Abstracts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick Associates Economic Consultants (2005): Economic Value of Trails and Forest Recreation in the Republic of Ireland. Jointly commissioned by the Irish Sports Council and Coillte. Available at http://www.coillte.ie/publications.

  • Forest Service (2006): Forest Recreation in Ireland – A Guide for Owners and Managers. Forest Service, Department of Agriculture and Food, Johnston Castle Estate, Co. Wexford, Ireland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forestry Commission (2004): Max Hislop, Mark Twery and Heini Vihemäki; Involving People in Forestry. A toolbox for public Involvement in Forest and woodland planning. Forestry Commission, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forestry Commission (2007): Public Opinion on Forestry. Summary results of the 2007 UK Survey of Public Opinion of Forestry, carried out on behalf of the Forestry Commission, Forestry Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fronczak, K. (2003): Poland’s green treasure house, State Forest Information Centre, Bogucki Wyd. Naukowe, Warsaw

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadow, K. von, Pukkala, T. and Tome, M. (2000): Sustainable Forest Management. Kluwer Adacemic Publishers, Dortrecht.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Güleş, O., Hohn, U. and Keil, A. (2005): Abschlussbericht des Projektes „Stadtnatur – Wahrnehmung, Bewertung und Aneignung durch türkische MigrantInnen im nördlichen Ruhrgebiet unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von Industriewaldflächen. Bochum/Dortmund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hägerstrand, T. (1995). A look at the political geography of environmental management. In: Landscape and Life; Appropriate scales for sustainable development. LLAS Working Paper no. 17, University College Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschfeld, C.C.L. (1785): Theorie der Gartenkunst. Nachdruck der Ausgabe 1782–1785. Hildesheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoogstra, M.A. and Van Blitterswijk, H. (2002): Financial forest policy instruments in the Netherlands; two examples. In Ottitsch, A., Tikkanen, I. and Riera, P. (eds), Financial instruments of forest policy. European Forest Institute, Joensuu, Finland, EFI Proceedings 42, pp. 117–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunziker, M., (2000): Einstellungen der Bevölkerung zu möglichen Landschaftsentwicklungen in den Alpen, Birmensdorf, Eidg. Forschungsanstalt WSL. 157 S.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, P. (2005): Freizeitaktivitäten im Lebensraum der Alpentiere – Konfliktbereiche zwischen Mensch und Tier. Haupt-Verlag, Bern.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, G.R. and Schreyer, R. (1980): Conflict in outdoor recreation: a theoretical perspective. Journal of Leisure Research, 12(4): 368–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, F.S. and Koch, N.E. (2004): Twenty-five years of forest recreation research in Denmark and its influence on forest policy. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 19(4), 93–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiricka, A. and Pröbstl, U. (2009): One common way – the strategic and methodological influence on environmental planning across Europe. Environmental Impact Assessment Review (in print).

    Google Scholar 

  • Job, H. and Metzler, D. (2006): Naturparke + Tourismus = Regionalentwicklung? Natur und Landschaft, 81(7), 355–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kairos future (2005): Kund- och intressentanalys. Slutrapport, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kajala, L., Almik, A., Dahl, R., Dikšaitė, L, Erkkonen, J., Fredman, P., Jensen, F. Søndergaard, Karoles, K., Sievänen, T., Skov-Petersen, H., Vistad, O.I. and Wallsten, P. (2007): Visitor monitoring in nature areas – a manual based on experiences from the Nordic and Baltic countries. TemaNord 2007:534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidestav, G. and Nordfjell, T. (2003): Med skogsägaren i fokus. LRF Skogsägarna, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenau, G., (2002): Entwicklung der Agrarlandschaften in Südbayern und Ihre Beurteilung durch die Bevölkerung, Franziska Land Verlag, 304 S.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindhagen, A. and Ahlström, I. (2005): Visitor studies in nature areas – a manual. Skogsstyrelsen, Jönköping, Rapport 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundell, Y. (2005): Acces to the forests for disabled people. Skogsstyrelsen, Jönköping, Rapport 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, C. (2006): Konflikte in Erholungsgebieten – Ursachen, Wirkungen und Lösungsansätze. Freiburger Schriften zur Forst und Umweltpolitik. Verlag Dr. Kessel, Remagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, R.E. (1999): Studies in Outdoor Recreation. Search and Research for Satisfaction (2nd edition). Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, Oregon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, R.E. (2007): Parks and Carrying Capacity. Commons Without Tragedy. Island Press, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marghescu, T. and Anderson, J., (1997): Issues and Opportunities in the Evolution of Private Forestry and Forestry Extension in Several Countries with Economies in Transition in Central and Eastern Europe, FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • McCammon, I. and Hägeli, P. (2007): An evaluation of rule-based decision tools for travel in avalanche terrain. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 47, 193–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MCPFE – Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe (2002): Improved Pan-European Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management, as adopted by the MCPFE Expert Level Meeting 7–8 October 2002, Vienna, Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  • MCPFE – Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe (2003): State of Europe’s Forest 2003. The MCPFE Report of Sustainable Forest Management in Europe source http://www.unece.org/trade/timber/docs/sfm/europe-2003.pdf

  • Memento Afocel (2004): Les chiffres cles de la foret privee 2005, accessed 05 May 2005, URL: http://www.arbocentre.asso.fr/infoFil/images/chiffres-cles2005.pdf

  • Muhar, A. (2004): Quantification of Public Access to the Landscape: Methods and Case Studies. In: Edinburgh College of Art: Open Space – People Space: International Conference for Inclusive Environments, 27–29 October 2004, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pine, B.J. and James, H.G. (1999): The Experience Economy: Work is Theater & Every Business a Stage. Harvard Business Press, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinterits, S. (2003): Die Zugänglichkeit der Landschaft – ein analytischer Vergleich zwischen Österreich und Italien. Diplomarbeit. Universität für Bodenkultur, Wien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pröbstl, U., Sterl, P., Visschedijk, P. (2006): Agent-based modelling as a tool to protect endangered habitats and species – Experiences of two model projects in Europe. Presentation at the third International Conference on Monitoring and Management of Visitor Flows in Recreational and Protected Areas, 14–19 October, Rapperswil, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. (1994): Imagination in discourse and in action. In: G. Robinson and Rundell, J. Rethinking Imagination: Culture and Creativity. Routlegde, London/New York, pp. 118–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, N, (2006): Developing criteria and indicators of sustainable forest management in the Arrow Forest District. BC. Journal of Ecosystems and Management, 7(1), 50–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosengren, M. and Franzén, K. (2006): Best practice. Råd och tips vid byggande av besöksanläggningar i naturen. Baltic Sea Region Interreg III B Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rupf, H. (1960): Wald und Menschen im Geschehen der Gegenwart. AFZ, 38, p. 545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rydberg, D. and Aronsson, M. (2004): Vår tätortsnära natur. Skogsstyrelsens Förlag, Jönköping.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salak, B. (2008): Grundlage für ein nachhaltiges Schutzgebietsmanagement im Rahmen der EMAS II-Verordnung, illustriert am Beispiel des Nationalparks Gesäuse, diploma thesis, University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Vienna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salisch, H. von (1885): Forstästhetik, 3. Auflage 1911. Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schemel, H.J. and Erbgut, W. (2000): Handbuch Sport und Umwelt, 3. Auflage, Meyer und Meyer, Aachen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelby and Heberlein (1986): Carrying Capacity in Recreation Settings. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, OR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sievänen, T. (ed) (2001a): Luonnon virkistyskäyttö 2000 (Outdoor recreation 2000), vol. 802 of Metsäntutkimuslaitoksen tiedonantoja, Helsinki (METLA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sievänen, T. (ed) (2001b): Luonnon virkistyskäyttö 2000. Summary: Outdoor recreation 2000. Metsäntutkimuksen tiedonantoja 802, 204 pp. Vammala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sievänen, T., Arnberger, A., Dehez, L., Grant, N., Jensen, F.S. and Skov-Petersen, H. (eds) (2008): Forest Recreation Monitoring – A European Perspective. 79, 245; Working Papers of the Finnish Forest Research Institute, Helsinki; ISBN: 978-951-40-2098-8

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Sweden (2004): Fritid 1976–2002. Levnadsförhållanden. Statistiska centralbyrån. Rapport 103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Supuka, J. and Vreštiak, P. (1984). Zásady tvorby parkových lesov. Bratislava, VEDA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tracz, H. and Gaca, J.,(2000): Wpływ presji ruchu turystyczno – rekreacyjnego na szkody w lasach Nadleśnictwa Józefów – Roztocze [in:] Problemy turystyki i rekreacji w lasach Polski, Krajowa Konferencja Naukowa, Warszawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA Forest Service (2004): National report on Sustainable Forests 2003, FS-766, http://www.fs.fed.us/research/sustain/documents/SustainableForests.pdf (accessed 29.11.2006)

  • Van Herzele, A., Collins, K. and Heyens, V. (2005): Interacting with green space. Public participation with professionals in the planning and management of parks and woodlands, Flemish Government, Nature and Forest Agency, Brussel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaske, J.J. and Shelby, L.B. (2008): Crowding as a Descriptive Indicator and an Evaluative Standard: Results from 30 Years of Research, Leisure Sciences, 30, 111–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vistad, O.I. (2003): Experience and management of recreational impact on the ground – a study among visitors and managers. Journal for Nature Conservation, 11, 363–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vistad, O.I. (1995): I skogen og i skolten - Ein analyse av friluftsliv, miljøoppleving, påverknad og forvaltning i Femundsmarka, med jamføringar til Rogen og Långfjället. (In the forest and in the head. An analysis of outdoor recreation, recreational experiences, recreational impacts and management in Femundsmarka, compared to Rogen and Långfjället – PhD Thesis in Human Geography – In Norwegian). - Dr.gradsavhandling i geografi, Universitetet i Trondheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vittersø, J., Chipeniuk, R., Skår, M. and Vistad, O.I. (2004): Recreational conflict is affective: the case of cross-country skiers and snowmobiles. Leisure Sciences, 26, 227–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, A.E. (1995): An analysis of recent progress in recreation conflict perception of future challenges and opportunities. Leisure Sciences, 17, 235–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiersma, Y., Duinker, P., Haider, W., Hvenegaard, G., and Schmiegelow, F. (forthcoming): The Relationship Between Protected Areas and Sustainable Forest Management: Many Shades of Green. Sustainable Forest Management Network – State of the Knowledge Report, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wöbse, H.-H. (2002): Landschaftsästhetik. Ulmer, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wöhrstein (1998): Mountainbike und Umwelt; ökologische Auswirkungen und Nutzungskonflikte. Dissertation der Universität des Saarlandes, Saarbrücken. Pirrot Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

Online Sources and Data bases

Legislation

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ulrike Pröbstl .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pröbstl, U., Wirth, V., Elands, B.H., Bell, S. (2010). Literature. In: Pröbstl, U., Wirth, V., Elands, B., Bell, S. (eds) Management of Recreation and Nature Based Tourism in European Forests. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03145-8_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics