Skip to main content

Is P = PSPACE for Infinite Time Turing Machines?

  • Conference paper
Infinity in Logic and Computation (ILC 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5489))

Included in the following conference series:

Introduction

In the existing literature on infinite time Turing machines (ITTM), which were originally defined in [3], issues of time complexity have been widely considered. The question \(\mathbf{P} \stackrel{?}{=} \mathbf{NP}\) for Infinite Time Turing Machines, and several variants on it, are treated in, e.g., [6],[2], and [4].

Besides time complexity, we may also try to look at issues of space complexity in ITTMs. However, because an ITTM contains tapes of length ω, and all nontrivial ITTM computations will use the entire, ω-length tape, simply measuring the space complexity by counting the portion of the tape used by the computation is not an option. In [5], therefore, an alternate notion of space complexity is provided, that is based on looking at the levels of Gödel’s constructible hierarchy where the snapshots of the computation can be found.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barry Cooper, S.: Computability Theory. Chapman & Hall/CRC (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Deolalikar, V., Hamkins, J.D., Schindler, R.-D.: PNP ∩ co-NP for infinite time Turing machines. J. Log. Comput. 15, 577–592 (2005)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Hamkins, J.D., Lewis, A.: Infinite time Turing machines. J. Symb. Log. 65, 567–604 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Hamkins, J.D., Welch, P.D.: P f NP f for almost all f. Math. Log. Q. 49(5), 536–540 (2003)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Löwe, B.: Space bounds for infinitary computation. In: Beckmann, A., Berger, U., Löwe, B., Tucker, J.V. (eds.) CiE 2006. LNCS, vol. 3988, pp. 319–329. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Schindler, R.: P ≠ NP for infinite time Turing machines. Monatsh. Math. 139, 335–340 (2003)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Winter, J.: Space Complexity in infinite time Turing Machines, ILLC Publications, MoL-2007-14 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Winter, J. (2009). Is P = PSPACE for Infinite Time Turing Machines?. In: Archibald, M., Brattka, V., Goranko, V., Löwe, B. (eds) Infinity in Logic and Computation. ILC 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5489. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03092-5_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03092-5_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-03091-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-03092-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics