Skip to main content

Automated Inference of Finite Unsatisfiability

  • Conference paper
Automated Deduction – CADE-22 (CADE 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5663))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We present Infinox, an automated tool for analyzing first-order logic problems, aimed at showing finite unsatisfiability, i.e. the absence of models with finite domains. Finite satisfiability is a semi-decidable problem, which means that such a tool can never be complete. Nevertheless, our hope is that Infinox be a complement to finite model finders in practice. The implementation consists of several different proof techniques for showing infinity of a set, each of which requires the identification of a function or a relation with particular properties. Infinox enumerates candidates to such functions and relations, and subsequently uses an automated theorem prover as a sub-procedure to try to prove the resulting proof obligations. We have evaluated Infinox on the relevant problems from the TPTP benchmark suite, with very promising results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Claessen, K., Sörensson, N.: New techniques that improve MACE-style model finding. In: Proc. of Workshop on Model Computation (MODEL) (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. McCune, W.: Solution of the Robbins problem. Journal of Automated Reasoning 19(3), 263–276 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. McCune, W.: Prover9 and Mace4 (2006), http://www.cs.unm.edu/~mccune/mace4/

  4. Schulz, S.: E - a brainiac theorem prover. AI Commun. 15(2-3), 111–126 (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Sutcliffe, G., Suttner, C.: The State of CASC. AI Communications 19(1), 35–48 (2006)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Sutcliffe, G., Suttner, C.B.: The TPTP Problem Library: CNF Release v1.2.1. Journal of Automated Reasoning 21(2), 177–203 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Sutcliffe, G.: TSTP – thousands of solutions of theorem provers (2008), http://www.tptp.org/TSTP

  8. The SPASS Team. The Spass theorem prover (2007), http://www.spass-prover.org/

  9. Vännännen, J.: A Short course on finite model theory, Department of Mathematics, University of Helsinki (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Claessen, K., Lillieström, A. (2009). Automated Inference of Finite Unsatisfiability. In: Schmidt, R.A. (eds) Automated Deduction – CADE-22. CADE 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5663. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02959-2_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02959-2_29

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-02958-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-02959-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics