Skip to main content

Bubble and Crash in the Artificial Financial Market

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Artificial Economics

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems ((LNE,volume 631))

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate bubble and crash in the artificial financial market. Based on Ball and Holt (1998)’s experiment in the laboratory with real human beings, we create a simple artificial financial market using an agent-based simulation. In this simulation, we model each agent with different characteristics with respect to expectation formation and time discounting. We found that the case of prospect theory plus exponential time discounting is most resemble with the price dynamics found in Ball and Holt’s experiment and real world price bubble and crash. We also examine whether Ball and Holt’s and our experiment are really judged as a bubble and crush with some indexes so far proposed. Then, Ball and Holt’ experimental result is judged not as a price bubble but as a divergent oscillation, while our result is judged as a bubble.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arthur, W.B., J. H. Holland, B. LeBaron, R.G. Palmer, and P. Tayler (1997) “Asset Pricing Under Endogenous Expectations in an Artificial Stock Market,” In The Economy as an Evolving Complex System, 2, pp. 15-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audet, M., T. Gravelle, and J. Yang (2002) “Alternative Trading Systems: Does One Shoe Fit All,” Bank of Canada Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. and C. Holt. (1998) “Classroom Games: Speculation and Bubbles in Asset Markets,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12, pp. 207–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S.C, C.-H. Yeh, and C.-C. Liao (1999) “Testing the rational expectations hypothesis with the agent-based model of stock markets,” In Proceedings of ICAI99, pp. 381–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, D. and R. Abraham (2007) “Bubbles and Crashes: Escape Dynamics in Financial Markets,” SCCIE WORKING PAPER, 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, D. and J. Rust (1993) The Double Auction Market: Institutions, Theories, and Evidence. Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, S., G. Lowenstein, and T. O’Donoghue (2002) “Time discounting and time preference: A critical review,” Journal of Economic Literature, 40, pp. 351–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, R. and W. George (1999) “On the Shape of the Probability Weighting Function,” Cognitive Psychology, 38, pp. 129–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Izumi, K. and K. Ueda (2000) “Introduction to Artificial Financial Market,” Magazine of Academic Society in Population Intelligence, 15, pp. 941–950.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky (1979) “Prospect Theory: An analysis of Decision under Risk,” Econometrica, 47, pp. 263–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laibson, D (1997) “Golden Eggs and Hyperbolic Discounting,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, pp. 443–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, M.G, A. Oba, and H. Takayasu (2002) “Parameter Estimation of a Generaized Langevin Equation of Market Price,” In Empirical Science of Financial Fluctuations - The Advent of Econophysics, Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loewenstein, G. and D. Prelec (1991) Choices Over Time, Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P (1937) “A note on measurement of utility,” Review of Economic Studies, 4, pp. 61–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoemaker P. J. H (1982) “The Expected Utility Model: Its Variants, Purposes, Evidence and Limitations,” Journal of Economic Literature, 20, pp. 529–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V, L., L. Suchanek, and W. Arlington (1988) “Bubbles, Crashes and Endogenous Expectations in Experimental Spot Asset Markets,” Econometrica, 56, pp. 1119–1151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takayasu, H. and M. Takayasu (1999) “Critical fluctiatopms of demand and supply,” Physica, 269, pp. 24–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, R, H (1981) “Some Empirical Evidence on Dynamic Inconsistency,” Economic Letters, 8, pp. 201–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • U-Mart Project Web Site, http://www.u-mart.org/ .

  • Von Neumann, J. and O. Morgenstern (1944) Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuji Karino .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Karino, Y., Kawagoe, T. (2009). Bubble and Crash in the Artificial Financial Market. In: Hernández, C., Posada, M., López-Paredes, A. (eds) Artificial Economics. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 631. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02956-1_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02956-1_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-02955-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-02956-1

  • eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics