The New-Keynesian (NK) approach to monetary policy analysis has emerged in recent years as one of the most influential and prolific areas of research in macroeconomics.1 It has provided us with a framework that combines the theoretical rigor of Real Business Cycle (RBC) theory with Keynesian ingredients like monopolistic competition and nominal rigidities. That framework has also become the basis for the new generation of models being developed at central banks, and increasingly used for simulation and forecasting purposes.2 In the present chapter, I will try to summarize what I view as some of the key lessons that have emerged from that research program and to point to some of the challenges it faces, as well as possible ways of overcoming these challenges.
Paper presented at the Center for Financial Studies Symposium on “The Science and Practice of Monetary Policy Today,” Frankfurt, October 4, 2007. Much of the research described in this paper is based on joint work with Olivier Blanchard, Rich Clarida, and Mark Gertler, who should get credit for all the valuable insights. I remain solely responsible for any misrepresentation of that work.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bayoumi, T. 2004. “GEM: A New International Macroeconomic Model.” IMF Occasional Paper no. 239.
Bernanke, B., M. Gertler, and S. Gilchrist. 1999. “The Financial Accelerator in a Quantitative Business Cycle Framework.” In Handbook of Macroeconomics, ed. J. Taylor and M. Woodford, volume 1C, 1341–1397. New York: Elsevier.
Blanchard, O. J., and J. Galí. 2006. “A New Keynesian Model with Unemployment.” mimeo.
Blanchard, O. J., and J. Galí. 2007a. “Real Wage Rigidities and the New Keynesian Model.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 39(s1): 35–66.
Blanchard, O. J., and J. Galí. 2007b. “The Macroeconomic Effects of Oil Shocks: Why are the 2000s so Different from the 1970s?” NBER Working Paper no. 13668.
Christiano, L. J., R. Motto, and M. Rostagno. 2006. “Monetary Policy and Stock Market Boom-Bust Cycles.” mimeo.
Clarida, R., J. Galí, and M. Gertler. 1999. “The Science of Monetary Policy: A New Keynesian Perspective.” Journal of Economic Literature, 37(4): 1661–1707.
Edge, R. M., M. T. Kiley, and J.-P. Laforte. 2007. “Documentation of the Research and Statistics Division's Estimated DSGE Model of the U.S. Economy: 2006 Version.” Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2007–53, Federal Reserve Board, Washington D.C.
Erceg, C. J., D. W. Henderson, and A. T. Levin. 2000. “Optimal Monetary Policy with Staggered Wage and Price Contracts.” Journal of Monetary Economics, 46(2): 281–314.
Faia, E., and T. Monacelli. 2006. “Optimal InterestRate Rules, AssetPrices and Credit Frictions.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 31(10): 3228–3254.
Galí, J. 2008. Forthcoming. Monetary Policy, Infation, and the Business-Cycle. An Introduction to the New Keynesian Framework and its Monetary Policy Applications. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Galí, J., and M. Gertler. 1999. “Inflation Dynamics: A Structural Econometric Analysis.” Journal of Monetary Economics, 44(2): 195–222.
Galí, J., and M. Gertler. 2007. “Macroeconomic Modeling for Monetary Policy Evaluation.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(4): 25–45.
Gilchrist, S., and J. Leahy. 2002. “Monetary Policy and Asset Prices.” Journal of Monetary Economics, 49 (1): 75–97.
Monacelli T. 2006. “Optimal Monetary Policy with Collateralized Household Debt and Borrowing Constraints.” mimeo.
Nakamura, E., and J. Steinsson. 2006. “Five Facts aboutPrices: A Reevaluation of Menu Costs Models.” Harvard University, mimeo.
Smets, F., and R. Wouters. 2003. “An Estimated Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Model of the Euro Area.” Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(5): 1123–1175.
Smets, F., and R. Wouters. 2007. “Shocks and Frictions in US Business Cycles: a Bayesian DSGE Approach.” American Economic Review, 97(3): 586–606.
Steinsson, J. 2003. “Optimal Monetary Policy in an Economy with Inflation Persistence.” Journal of Monetary Economics, 50(7): 1425–1456.
Woodford, M. 2001. “The Taylor Rule and Optimal Monetary Policy.” American Economic Review, 91(2): 232–237.
Woodford, M. 2003a. “Optimal Interest Rate Smoothing.” Review of Economic Studies, 70(4): 861–886.
Woodford, M. 2003b. Interest and Prices: Foundations of a Theory of Monetary Policy Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Galí, J. (2010). The New-Keynesian Approach to Monetary Policy Analysis: Lessons and New Directions. In: Wieland, V. (eds) The Science and Practice of Monetary Policy Today. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02953-0_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02953-0_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-02952-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-02953-0
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)