Skip to main content

Effectiveness of Business Alliances Partnerships

  • Chapter
  • 634 Accesses

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 226))

Abstract

This paper focuses on many valued logic applied for filtering out the most profitable collaboration alternatives. The final recommendation is based on methods from the Analytic Hierarchy Process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Belnap, N.J.: How a computer should think. In: Proceedings of the Oxford International Symposia on Contemporary Aspects of Philosophy, Oxford, GB, pp. 30–56 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Belnap, N.J.: A useful four valued logic. In: Dunn, J.M., Epstain, G. (eds.) Modern uses of multiple-valued logic, pp. 8–37. D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Belton, V., Gear, T.: On a Short-coming of Saaty’s Method of Analytic Hierarchies. Omega 11(3), 228–230 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bierman, H., Smidt, S.: The Capital Budgeting Decision. Routledge, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Coste-Marquis, S., Marquis, P.: Complexity Results for Paraconsistent Inference Relations. In: Fensel, D., Giunchiglia, F., McGuinness, D.L., Williams, M.-A. (eds.) Proceedings of the Eights International Conference on Principles and Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 2002), Toulouse, France, pp. 61–72. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dyer, J.S.: Remarks on the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Management Science 36(3), 249–258 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Dyer, J.H., Kale, P., Singh, H.: How to Make Strategic Alliances Work. Sloan Management Review 42(4), 37–43 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ganapathy, S., Narayanan, S., Srinivasan, K.: Logistics: simulation based decision support for supply chain logistics. In: Proceedings of the 35th conference on Winter simulation: driving innovation, New Orleans, Louisiana, pp. 1013–1020 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ganter, B.: Two Basic Algorithms in Concept Analysis, FB4-Preprint 831, TH Darmstadt (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ganter, B., Stumme, G., Wille, R. (eds.): Formal Concept Analysis. LNCS, vol. 3626. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jing, L., Jiafu, W.: Administration decision support system for shipping enterprises. In: Proceedings of 1999 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 3, pp. 1048–1053 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kaluzhny, Y., Muravitsky, A.Y.: A knowledge representation based on the Belnap’s four valued logic. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 3, 189–203 (1993)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Klein, G.A.: Recognition-Primed Decision Making. In: Sources of power: How people make decisions, pp. 15–30. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Layard, R., Glaister, S.: Cost-Benefit Analysis, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nas, T.F.: Cost-benefit Analysis, Theory and Application. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nishizawa, K.: A consistency improving method in binary AHP. Journal of the operations research Society of Japan 38(1) (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Perez, J., Jimeno, J.L., Mokotoff, E.: Another Potential Shortcoming of AHP. Business and Economics 14(1), 99–111 (2006)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Promentilla, M.A.B., Furuichia, T., Ishiia, K., Tanikawa, N.: Evaluation of remedial countermeasures using the analytic network process. Waste Management 26(12), 1410–1421 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Saaty, T.L.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York (1980)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Vaidya, O., Kumar, S.: Analytic Hierarchy Process: an overview of applications. European Journal of Operational Research 169, 1–29 (2006)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Zirger, B.J., Maidique, M.: A model of new product development: an empirical test. Management Science 36, 867–883 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. http://www.superdecisions.com/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Encheva, S., Tumin, S. (2009). Effectiveness of Business Alliances Partnerships. In: Damiani, E., Jeong, J., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds) New Directions in Intelligent Interactive Multimedia Systems and Services - 2. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 226. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02937-0_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02937-0_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-02936-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-02937-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics