Skip to main content

A Distance-Based Operator to Revising Ontologies in DL \(\mathcal{SHOQ}\)

  • Conference paper
  • 1237 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5590))

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a distance-based operator to revise ontologies with acyclic generalized terminology as its TBOX in description logic \(\mathcal{SHOQ}\). Our operator resolves incoherence between the original ontology and the newly received ontology. We first reformulate Dalal’s operator to \(\mathcal{SHOQ}\), and propose a query-equivalent syntactical formulation based on a notion called a revision policy. We then propose a tableau algorithm to generate such revision policies and prove the correctness of the algorithm. We show that the complexity of our algorithm stays at the same level as that of satisfiability check in \(\mathcal{SHOQ}\).

Guilin Qi is partially supported by the EU in the IST project NeOn. Zhisheng Huang is partially supported by EU-funded Projects OpenKnowledge and LarKC. We thank the reviewers for very helpful comments to improve the quality of our work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Haase, P., Stojanovic, L.: Consistent evolution of owl ontologies. In: Gómez-Pérez, A., Euzenat, J. (eds.) ESWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3532, pp. 182–197. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Haase, P., van Harmelen, F., Huang, Z., Stuckenschmidt, H., Sure, Y.: A framework for handling inconsistency in changing ontologies. In: Gil, Y., Motta, E., Benjamins, V.R., Musen, M.A. (eds.) ISWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3729, pp. 353–367. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Gärdenfors, P.: Knowledge in Flux-Modeling the Dynamic of Epistemic States. MIT Press, Cambridge (1988)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Flouris, G., Plexousakis, D., Antoniou, G.: On applying the agm theory to dls and owl. In: Gil, Y., Motta, E., Benjamins, V.R., Musen, M.A. (eds.) ISWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3729, pp. 216–231. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Flouris, G., Huang, Z., Pan, J.Z., Plexousakis, D., Wache, H.: Inconsistencies, negations and changes in ontologies. In: Proc. of AAAI 2006, pp. 1295–1300 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schlobach, S., Huang, Z., Cornet, R., van Harmelen, F.: Debugging incoherent terminologies. J. Autom. Reasoning 39(3), 317–349 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Völker, J., Vrandecic, D., Sure, Y., Hotho, A.: Learning disjointness. In: Franconi, E., Kifer, M., May, W. (eds.) ESWC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4519, pp. 175–189. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Horrocks, I., Sattler, U.: Ontology reasoning in the shoq(d) description logic. In: Proc. of IJCAI 2001, pp. 199–204 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dalal, M.: Investigations into a theory of knowledge base revision: Preliminary report. In: Proc. of AAAI 1988, pp. 475–479 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Patel-Schneider, P., Hayes, P., Horrocks, I.: Owl web ontology language semantics and abstract syntax. In: Technical report, W3C. W3C Recommendation (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P.: The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, implementation and application. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Liberatore, P., Schaerf, M.: Reducing belief revision to circumscription (and vice versa). Artif. Intell. 93, 261–296 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Qi, G., Liu, W., Bell, D.A.: Knowledge base revision in description logics. In: Fisher, M., van der Hoek, W., Konev, B., Lisitsa, A. (eds.) JELIA 2006. LNCS, vol. 4160, pp. 386–398. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Halaschek-Wiener, C., Katz, Y., Parsia, B.: Belief base revision for expressive description logics. In: Proc. of OWL-ED 2006 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ribeiro, M.M., Wassermann, R.: Base revision in description logics - preliminary results. In: Proc. of IWOD 2007 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Qi, G., Haase, P., Huang, Z., Ji, Q., Pan, J.Z., Völker, J.: A kernel revision operator for terminologies - algorithms and evaluation. In: Proc. of ISWC 2008, pp. 419–434 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. de Giacomo, G., Lenzerini, M., Poggi, A., Rosati, R.: On the update of description logic ontologies at the instance level. In: Proc. of AAAI 2006 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Yang, F., Qi, G., Huang, Z. (2009). A Distance-Based Operator to Revising Ontologies in DL \(\mathcal{SHOQ}\) . In: Sossai, C., Chemello, G. (eds) Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. ECSQARU 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5590. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02906-6_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02906-6_38

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-02905-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-02906-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics