Advertisement

Enhanced Industrial Maintenance Work Task Planning by Using Virtual Engineering Tools and Haptic User Interfaces

  • Simo-Pekka Leino
  • Salla Lind
  • Matthieu Poyade
  • Sauli Kiviranta
  • Petteri Multanen
  • Arcadio Reyes-Lecuona
  • Ari Mäkiranta
  • Ali Muhammad
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5622)

Abstract

Good maintainability is an essential feature for machines and processes in industry. It promotes, among others, maintenance safety, post-maintenance reliability and cost-effective maintenance by ensuring quick and easy operation and short downtime. Virtual engineering tools provide an effective way for maintainability design already during the design phase. Machine designers may not consider maintenance tasks systematically, which can leave important task details open. The missing detail planning can contribute significantly to the probability of safety or reliability risks. So far, generic tools or facilities for planning demanding maintenance tasks in detail have not been available for companies’ independent use. Another challenge is to develop and apply better user interfaces for design processes. Virtual engineering tools, such as virtual reality (VR) and haptics, provide a potential solution for improving maintenance planning and maintainability design. This paper introduces development and benefits of a new haptic interface for planning and training industrial maintenance tasks. The paper introduces a test with haptics tools in virtual maintenance case examples. As a conclusion we will sum up, whether the use of a haptic user interface would enhance task planning and maintainability design. In addition, we propose a set of recommendations regarding use of haptics in maintenance planning and maintainability design.

Keywords

Haptics Virtual Environments Maintenance 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Lind, S., Leino, S.-P., Multanen, P., Mäkiranta, A., Heikkilä, J.: A virtual engineering based method for maintainability design. In: 4th International Conference on Maintenance and Facility Management, Rome, Italy, April 22-24 (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Leino, S.-P., Helin, K., Lind, S., Viitaniemi, J., Multanen, P., Mäkiranta, A., Lahtinen, J., Nuutinen, P., Heikkilä, J., Martikainen, T.: Virtual engineering and remote operation in design, training and completion of demanding maintenance work tasks in challenging industrial plants (Virvo). In: MaSi Programme 2005-2009. Yearbook 2008. Tekes (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kimura, F., Yamane, N.: Haptic Environment for Designing Human Interface of Virtual Mechanical Products. The International Academy for Production Engineering, CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology 55, 127–130 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Reitmaa, I., Vanhala, J., Kauttu, A., Antila, M.: Virtuaaliympäristöt - kuvan sisälle vievät tekniikat. 2nd edn. TEKES, Helsinki (1996)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sharma, R.K., Kumar, S.: Performance Modeling in Critical Systems Using RAM Analysis. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 93, 913–919 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    SAE J817-2. Engineering Design Serviceability Guidelines – Construction and Industrial Machinery – Maintainability Index – Off-Road Work Machines. Surface Vehicle Information Report. Society of Automotive Engineers. Warrendale, PA (March 1991) Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wani, M.F., Gandhi, O.P.: Development of Maintainability Index for Mechanical Systems. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 65, 259–270 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Muhammad, A., Esque, S., Tolonen, M., Mattila, J., Nieminen, P., Linna, O., Vilenius, P.: Water hydraulic based teleoperation system for ITER. In: Tenth Scandinavian International Conference on Fluid Power, SICFP 2007, Tampere, Finland (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Srinivasan, M.A., Basdogan, C.: Haptics in Virtual Environments: Taxonomy, Research Status and Challenges. Computer & Graphics 21, 393–404 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
    MacLean, K.E., Hayward, V.: Do It yourself Haptics: Part II. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 104–119 (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Itkowitz, B., Handley, J., Zhu, W.: The OpenHapticsTM Toolkit: A Library for Adding 3D TouchTM Navigation and Haptics to Graphics Applications. In: Proc. 1st Joint Eurohaptics Conf. and Symp. Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, World Haptics, pp. 590–591. IEEE CS Press, Pisa (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Potts, A.: Phantom-based haptic interaction. In: Proc. Comput. Sci. discipline semin. conf. CSCI 3901 (2000), http://mrs.umn.edu/~lopezdr/seminar/spring2000/potts.pdf
  14. 14.
    Poyade, M., Reyes Lecuona, A., Leino, S.-P., Kiviranta, S., Viciana Abad, R., Lind, S.: A High-Level Haptic Interface for Enhanced Interaction within VirtoolsTM. In: 13th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, San Diego, USA, July 19-24 (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Simo-Pekka Leino
    • 1
  • Salla Lind
    • 1
  • Matthieu Poyade
    • 2
  • Sauli Kiviranta
    • 1
  • Petteri Multanen
    • 3
  • Arcadio Reyes-Lecuona
    • 2
  • Ari Mäkiranta
    • 3
  • Ali Muhammad
    • 3
  1. 1.VTT Technical Research Centre of FinlandFinland
  2. 2.Departamento de Tecnología Electrónica, ETSI de TelecomunicaciónUniversidad de MálagaMálagaSpain
  3. 3.IHA Department of Intelligent Hydraulics and AutomationTampere University of TechnologyFinland

Personalised recommendations