Is Embodied Interaction Beneficial When Learning Programming?
Embodied interaction has been claimed to offer important advantages for learning programming. However frequently claims have been based on intuitions and work in the area has focused largely around system-building rather than on evaluation and reflection around those claims. Taking into account research in the area as well as in areas such as tangibles, psychology of programming and the learning and teaching of programming, this paper identifies a set of important factors to take into account when analysing the potential of learning environments for programming employing embodied interaction. These factors are formulated as a set of questions that could be asked either when designing or analysing this type of learning environments.
KeywordsProgramming Environment Learn Program Image Schema Programming Concept Initial Framework
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Dourish, P.: Where the action is: the foundations of embodied interaction. MIT Press, London (2001)Google Scholar
- 2.Blackwell, A.: What is programming? In: Kuljis, J., Baldwin, L., Scoble, R. (eds.) Proceedings of the 14th annual workshop of the Psychology of Programming Interest Group, pp. 204–218 (2002)Google Scholar
- 3.du Boulay, B.: Some difficulties of learning to program. In: Soloway, E., Spohrer, J. (eds.) Studying the Novice Programmer, pp. 283–299. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1989)Google Scholar
- 4.Rist, R.S.: Plans in programming: definition, demonstration and development. In: Soloway, E., Iyengar, S. (eds.) Empirical Studies of Programmers, first workshop, pp. 28–47. Ablex Publishing, Norwood, New Jersey (1986)Google Scholar
- 7.Hornecker, E., Buur, J.: Getting a grip on tangible interaction: a framework on physical space and social interaction. In: CHI 2006: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems, pp. 437–446. ACM Press, New York (2006)Google Scholar
- 8.Price, S.: A representation approach to conceptualizing tangible learning environments. In: TEI 2008: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Tangible and embedded interaction, pp. 151–158. ACM Press, New York (2008)Google Scholar
- 11.Hurtienne, J., Israel, J.H.: Image schemas and their metaphorical extensions: intuitive patterns for tangible interaction. In: TEI 2007: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Tangible and embedded interaction, pp. 127–134. ACM Press, New York (2007)Google Scholar
- 12.Johnson, M.: The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1987)Google Scholar
- 13.McDowell, C., Werner, L., Bullock, H., Fernald, J.: The impact of pair-programming on student performance, perception and persistence. In: Clarke, L., Dillon, L., Tichy, W. (eds.) Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 602–607. IEEE Computer Society, Washington (2003)Google Scholar
- 15.Papert, S.: Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. Basic Books, New York (1980)Google Scholar
- 16.Lindley, S.E., Couteur, J.L., Berthouze, N.L.: Stirring up experience through movement in game play: effects on engagement and social behaviour. In: CHI 2008: Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pp. 511–514. ACM Press, New York (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Horn, M.S., Jacob, R.J.K.: Tangible programming in the classroom with tern. In: CHI 2007: extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, pp. 1965–1970. ACM Press, New York (2007)Google Scholar
- 21.Wyeth, P., Purchase, H.C.: Tangible programming elements for young children. In: CHI 2002: extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, pp. 774–775. ACM Press, New York (2002)Google Scholar
- 24.Romero, P., Good, J., Robertson, J., du Boulay, B., Reid, H., Howland, K.: Embodied interaction in authoring environments. In: Ramduny-Ellis, D., Hare, J., Gill, S., Dix, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the second Workshop on Physicality, pp. 43–46. UWIC Press, Lancaster (2007)Google Scholar