Skip to main content

The End of the Republic

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mind the Gap

Abstract

Virgil first read his Georgics, or “farm poem,” to the first Roman emperor, Augustus, on his way back from the battle at Actium – where Augustus had put an end to the Roman republic, and established one-man rule. Virgil’s natural history was bad: he thought that queen bees were kings, among other things. But the point he was making was good. Communis natos, he wrote: in Rome, as in Apis mellifera hives, sterile workers and soldiers would help raise the young of their emperor, or queen. Like dominant members of eusocial species – bees, ants, wasps, gall thrips, termites, aphids, beetles, sponge-dwelling shrimp, and naked mole-rats – Roman emperors had enormous reproductive success. They had sexual access to hundreds or thousands of women, who may have borne hundreds or thousands of children. And they got help defending their territories, and provisioning their families, from millions of facultatively sterile workers and soldiers, and from thousands of eunuchs – who made up an obligately sterile caste. This example from human history illustrates the unusual flexibility of human reproductive strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen JP (2005) The ancient Egyptian pyramid texts. Leiden, Brill

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoki S (1977) Colophina clematis (Homoptera, Pemphigidae), an aphid species with ‘soldiers’. Kontyû 45:276–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Batra SWT (1966) Nests and social behavior of halictine bees of India. Indian J Entomol 28:375–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman RA (1974) Impietas in princepem. Beck, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman RA (1996) Crime and punishment in ancient Rome. Routledge, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Betzig LL (1986) Despotism and differential reproduction: a Darwinian view of history. Aldine de Gruyter, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Betzig LL (1992a) Roman polygyny. Ethol Sociobiol 13:309–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betzig LL (1992b) Roman monogamy. Ethol Sociobiol 13:351–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betzig LL (1993) Sex, succession, and stratification in the first six civilizations. In: Ellis L (ed) Social stratification and socioeconomic inequality. Praeger, New York, pp 37–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Betzig LL (2005) Politics as sex: the Old Testament case. Evol Psychol 3:326–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Betzig LL (2008) Fertility in the bible and ancient Middle East. In: Goldberg R (ed) Judaism in biological perspective. Paradigm, Boulder, pp 42–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley KR (1978) The age at time of sale of female slaves. Arethusa 11:243–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley KR (1991) Discovering the Roman family: studies in Roman social history. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton RF (1979) The kamasutra of Vatsyayana. Heinemann, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Carneiro RL (1970) A theory of the origin of the state. Science 169:733–738

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carneiro RL (1986) Further reflections on resource concentration and its role in the rise of the state. In: Manzanilla L (ed) Studies in the neolithic and urban revolutions. BAR, Oxford, pp 245–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH (2006) Cooperative breeding in mammals. In: Kappeler PM, van Schaik CP (eds) Cooperation in primates and humans: mechanisms and evolution. Springer, Berlin, pp 173–190

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Costa JT, Fitzgerald TD (2005) Social terminology revisited: where are we ten years later? Ann Zool Fennici 42:559–564

    Google Scholar 

  • Crespi BJ (1992) Eusociality in Australian gall thrips. Nature 359:724–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crespi BJ (2005) Social sophistry: logos and mythos in the forms of cooperation. Ann Zool Fennici 42:569–571

    Google Scholar 

  • Crespi BJ, Yanega D (1995) The definition of eusociality. Behav Ecol 6:109–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy JE (1996) Eusociality in a coral-reef shrimp. Nature 381:512–514

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap JE (1924) The office of the grand chamberlain in the later roman and byzantine empires. In: Boak AER, Dunlap JE (eds) Two studies in later Roman and Byzantine Administration. Macmillan, New York, pp 130–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebrey PB (2003) Women and the family in Chinese history. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Emlen ST (1982) The evolution of helping. I. An ecological constraints model. Am Nat 119:29–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emlen ST (1995) An evolutionary theory of the family. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:8092–8099

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Emlen ST (1997) Predicting family dynamics in social vertebrates. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioral ecology: an evolutionary approach, 4th edn. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 228–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher MM (2001) The sons of Ramesses II. Harrassowitz, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishwick D (1987) The imperial cult in the Latin West. Brill, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster KR, Ratnieks FLW (2005) A new eusocial vertebrate? Trends Ecol Evol 20:363–364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gadagkar R (1994) Why the definition of eusociality is not helpful to understand its evolution and what should we do about it. Oikos 70:485–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelzer M (1968) Caesar: politician and statesman. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Gradel I (2004) Emperor worship and Roman religion. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Grayson AK (1995) Eunuchs in power: their role in the Assyrian bureaucracy. In: Dietrich M, Loretz O (eds) Vom Alten Orient zum Alten Testament. Festschrift für Wolfram Freiherrn, Neukirchen, pp 85–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD (1964) The genetical evolution of social behavior. I & II. J Theor Biol 7:1–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD (1972) Altruism and related phenomena, mainly in social insects. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 3:193–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill K, Hurtado AM (1996) Ache life history: the ecology and demography of a foraging people. Aldine de Gruyter, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins K (1963) Eunuchs in politics in the later Roman Empire. Proc Camb Philol Soc 9:62–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins K (1978) Conquerors and slaves: sociological studies in Roman history I. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrdy SB (2005) The evolutionary context of human development: the cooperative breeding model. In: Carter CS, Ahnert L, Grossmann KE, Hrdy SB, Lamb ME, Porges SW, Sachser N (eds) Attachment and bonding: a new synthesis. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 9–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes WOH, Oldroyd BP, Beekman M, Ratnieks FLW (2008) Ancestral monogamy shows kin selection is key to the evolution of eusociality. Science 320:1213–1216

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis JUM (1981) Eusociality in a mammal: cooperative breeding in naked mole-rat colonies. Science 212:571–573

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis JUM, O’Riain MJ, Bennett NC, Sherman PW (1994) Mammalian eusociality: a family affair. Trends Ecol Evol 9:47–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones AHM (1964) The later Roman Empire 284–602: a social, economic, and administrative survey. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller L (1993) Queen number and sociality in insects. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Kent DS, Simpson JA (1992) Eusociality in the beetle Austroplatypus incompertus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Naturwissenschaften 79:86–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacey EA, Sherman PW (2005) Redefining eusociality: concepts, goals, and the levels of analysis. Ann Zool Fennici 42:573–577

    Google Scholar 

  • Michener CD (1974) The social behavior of bees: a comparative study. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Musurillo H (1972) Acts of the Christian martyrs. Clarendon, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Postgate JN (1994) Early Mesopotamia. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratnieks FLW, Wenseleers T (2008) Altruism in insect societies and beyond: voluntary or enforced. Trends Ecol Evol 23:45–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rawson B (1966) Family life among the lower classes at Rome in the first two centuries of the empire. Class Philol 61:71–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawson B (1986) Children in the Roman familia. In: Rawson B (ed) The family in ancient Rome. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, pp 170–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Saller RP, Shaw BD (1984) Tombstones and Roman family relations in the principate: civilians, soldiers and slaves. J Roman Stud 74:124–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheidel W (2009) Sex and empire: a Darwinian perspective. In: Morris I, Scheidel W (eds) The dynamics of ancient empires: state power from Assyria to Byzantium. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 255–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheidel W (2009) The Roman slave supply. In: Bradley K, Cartledge P (eds) Cambridge world history of slavery. I. The ancient mediterranean world. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 230–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeley TD (1985) Honeybee ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamasastry R (1951) Kautilya’s arthashastra. University Bombay Press, Bombay

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman PW, Lacey EA, Reeve HK, Keller L (1995) The eusociality continuum. Behav Ecol 6:102–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith EA (2004) Why do good hunters have higher reproductive success? Hum Nat 15:343–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Syme R (1939) The Roman revolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Syme R (1960) Bastards in the Roman aristocracy. Proc Am Philos Soc 104:323–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Talbert RJA (1984) The senate of imperial Rome. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor LR (1961) Freedmen and freeborn in the epitaphs of imperial Rome. Am J Philol 82:113–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorne BL (1997) Evolution of eusociality in termites. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 28:27–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tougher S (2002) Eunuchs in antiquity and beyond. Duckworth, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Tougher S (2008) Eunuchs in Byzantine history and society. Routlege, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Treggiari S (1975) Family life among the staff of the Volusii. Trans Proc Am Philol Assoc 105:393–401

    Google Scholar 

  • Treggiari S (1991) Roman marriage. Iusti coniuges from the time of cicero to the time of ulpian. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai SH (1996) The eunuchs in the Ming Dynasty. SUNY Press, Albany

    Google Scholar 

  • Vehrencamp SL (1983a) A model for the evolution of despotic versus egalitarian societies. Anim Behav 31:667–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vehrencamp SL (1983b) Optimal degree of skew in cooperative societies. Am Zool 23:327–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver PRC (1972) Familia caesaris. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wells CM (1999) Celibate soldiers: Augustus and the army. Am J Ancient Hist 14:180–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitfield BG (1956) Virgil and the bees: a study in ancient apicultural lore. Greece & Rome 3:99–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (1971) The insect societies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO, Hölldobler B (2005) Eusociality: origins and consequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:13367–13371

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I thank my old friend, Bernie Crespi, for help with evolutionary biology; and I thank my old friend, Walter Scheidel, for help with Roman history.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura Betzig .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Betzig, L. (2010). The End of the Republic. In: Kappeler, P., Silk, J. (eds) Mind the Gap. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02725-3_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics