Abstract
Much adaptive human behavior is much too complex to be invented by any single individual in his lifetime. Such complex behavior can be learned and maintained in human populations, however, because our species possesses evolved psychological abilities for acquiring and modifying complex behavior and knowledge. One puzzle surrounding the origin of human behavior, with its strong reliance on socially transmitted knowledge, is how natural selection can favor costly abilities for complex social learning before the existence of complex behavior to be learned. The finding of special-purpose social learning abilities in other apes has only sharpened this puzzle – if other apes are good at imitation, is the key difference between ourselves and chimpanzees instead rates of innovation? In this chapter, I explore this puzzle by considering the simultaneous coevolution of both social learning ability and individual innovation. When one allows both innovation and the accuracy of social learning to evolve independently of one another, natural selection can favor increased investment in social learning, but only if it first favors increased innovation. However, once social learning evolves to high accuracy, high innovation rates are no longer needed, and natural selection favors reduced investment in innovation. Thus, the debate about whether innovation or imitation defines the gap between humans and other apes may be misstated. Instead, the emergence of human culture may have required the coevolution of both kinds of learning.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Barton NH, Keightley PD (2002) Understanding quantitative genetic variation. Nat Rev Genet 3:11–21
Boyd R (1982) Density-dependent mortality and the evolution of social interactions. Anim Behav 30:972–982
Boyd R, Richerson PJ (1985) Culture and the evolutionary process. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL
Boyd R, Richerson PJ (1996) Why culture is common, but cultural evolution is rare. Proc Br Acad 88:77–93
Cavalli-Sforza LL, Feldman MW (1981) Cultural transmission and evolution: a quantitative approach. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Dawkins R (1982) The extended phenotype: the long reach of the gene. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Durham WH (1991) Coevolution: genes, culture, and human diversity. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA
Fisher RA (1918) The correlation between relatives on the supposition of Mendelian inheritance. Trans Roy Soc Edinb 52:399–433
Frank SA (2009) Natural selection maximizes fisher information. J Evol Biol 22:231–244
Galef BG Jr (1996) Social enhancement of food preferences in Norway rats: a brief review. In: Heyes CM, Galef BG Jr (eds) Social learning and imitation: the roots of culture. Academic, San Diego, CA, pp 49–64
Henrich J, Boyd R (2002) On modeling cognition and culture: why cultural evolution does not require replication of representations. J Cogn Cult 2:87–112
Henrich J, Boyd R, Richerson PJ (2008) Five misunderstandings about cultural evolution. Human Nature 19(2):119–226
Jablonka E, Lamb MJ (1991) Sex chromosomes and speciation. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 243:203–208
Jablonka E, Lamb MJ (2005) Evolution in four dimensions: genetic, epigenetic, behavioral, and symbolic variation in the history of life. MIT, Cambridge, MA
Jenkin F (1867) The origin of species. North Brit Rev 46:277–318
Kirschner M, Gerhart J (1998) Evolvability. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:8420–8427
Leimar O (1996) Life history analysis of the Trivers and Willard sex-ratio problem. Behav Ecol 7:316–325
Levins R (1968) Evolution in changing environments: some theoretical explorations. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Maynard Smith J (1978) The evolution of sex. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Maynard Smith J (1990) Models of a dual inheritance system. J Theor Biol 143:41–53
Maynard Smith J (1998) Evolutionary genetics, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Odling-Smee FJ, Laland KN, Feldman MW (2003) Niche construction: the neglected process in evolution. Monographs in population biology 37. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Pál C, Miklós I (1999) Epigenetic inheritance, genetic assimilation and speciation. J Theor Biol 200:19–37
Richerson PJ, Boyd R (2005) Not by genes alone: how culture transformed human evolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL
Rogers AR (1988) Does biology constrain culture? Am Anthropol 90:819–831
Sheahan MB, Rose RJ, McCurdy DW (2004) Organelle inheritance in plant cell division: the actin cytoskeleton is required for unbiased inheritance of chloroplasts, mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum in dividing protoplasts. Plant J 37:379–390
Silk JB, Boyd R (1983) Female cooperation, competition, and mate choice in matrilineal macaque groups. In: Wasser SK (ed) Social behavior of female vertebrates. Academic, New York, NY, pp 315–347
Sperber D (2000) An objection to the memetic approach to culture. In: Aunger R (ed) Darwinizing culture: the status of memetics as a science. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 163–173
Szathmáry E, Maynard Smith J (1995) The major evolutionary transitions. Nature 374:227–232
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McElreath, R. (2010). The Coevolution of Genes, Innovation, and Culture in Human Evolution. In: Kappeler, P., Silk, J. (eds) Mind the Gap. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02725-3_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02725-3_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-02724-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-02725-3
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)