Advertisement

Groupware Accessibility for Persons with Disabilities

  • John G. Schoeberlein
  • Yuanqiong (Kathy) Wang
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5616)

Abstract

The accessibility issues of Groupware applications prevent visually impaired and other persons with disabilities access to these highly graphical interfaces. To address the accessibility issues persons with disabilities have with Groupware, a recent literature review on Groupware accessibility was performed. This paper reviews recent research to identify the accessibility issues; the input devices and output forms utilized to improve accessibility; and, the proposed solutions for Groupware accessibility. The conclusion is that encapsulating or overlaying the Groupware interface with an accessible auditory interface was a common solution to accessibility. Future research is needed in the following areas: guidelines for accessibility; identifying accessibility issues that users with disabilities may face; promoting awareness of the accessibility issues; evaluating groupware accessibility; design of accessible auditory interfaces; system/software support for persons with disabilities working in isolation; support for alternative input and output devices for persons with disabilities.

Keywords

CSCW Groupware accessibility blind visually impaired dyslexia user Interface assistive technology 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Appelt, W.: WWW Based Collaboration with BSCW System. In: Bartosek, M., Tel, G., Pavelka, J. (eds.) SOFSEM 1999. LNCS, vol. 1725, pp. 66–78. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bishup, J., Rama, J.: A Survey and Comparison of CSCW Groupware Applications. In: Proceedings of SAICSIT, pp. 198–205 (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bishup, J., Danzfuss, T., Klazar, R., Rama, J., Tseoali, T.: Nomad – Collaborative groupware for casually-connected communities. Technical Report, Polelo Research Group, University of Pretoria (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chapuis, O., Roussel, N.: EyePoint: Practical Pointing and Selection Using Gaze and Keyboard. In: Proceedings of CHI 2007, pp. 421–430. ACM Press, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chong, C.: Making your web site accessible to the visually impaired, http://www.nfb.org/nfb/Web_accessibility.asp?SnID=2
  6. 6.
    Ellis, C.A., Gibbs, S.J., Reim, G.L.: Groupware: Some issues and experiences. Communications of the ACM 34(1), 680–689 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
    GroupSystems ThinkTank, http://www.groupsystems.com/thinktank
  11. 11.
    Hampel, T., Keil-Slawik, R., Claassen, B.G., Plohmann, F., Reimann, C.: Pragmatic Solutions for Better Integration of the Visually Impaired in Virtual Communities. In: Proceedings GROUP 1999, pp. 258–266. Phoenix, AR (1999)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Harrison, S.M.: Opening the Eyes of Those Who Can See to the World of Those Who Can’t: A Case Study. In: Proceedings of SIGCSE 2005, pp. 22–26. St. Louis, Missouri (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hoffe, G.H., Lugt, H.T.: CoCoDoc: A Framework for Collaborating compound document editing based on OpenDoc and CORBA. In: Proceedings IFIP/IEEE, Conference on Open Distributed Processing and Distributed Platforms, pp. 15–33 (1997)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jarvi, J., Martin, B., Pecci, I., Pietrzak, T., Raisamo, R., Rami, S.: The MICOLE Architecture: Multimodal Support for Inclusion of Visually Impaired Children. In: Proceedings of ICMI 2007, pp. 193–200. Nagoya, Aichi (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Luk, R., Yeung, D., Lu, O., Leung, E., Li, S.Y., Leung, F.: Digital Library Access for Chinese Visually Impaired. In: ACM 2000, pp. 244–245 (2000)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
  17. 17.
    National Federation of the Blind, http://www.nfb.org/nfb/default.asp?SnID=627174770
  18. 18.
  19. 19.
    Schultz, U., Vandenbosch, B.: Information Overload in a Groupware Environment: Now You See It, Now You Don’t. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce 8(2), 127–148 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shneiderman, B., Plaisant, C.: Designing the User Interface: Strategies for an Effective Human-Computer Interaction, 4th edn., pp. 411–450. Addison Wesley, Reading (2005)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Special Education Needs and Disabilities Act, The Queen’s Printer of Acts of Parliament, The Stationary Office Limited, London, UK, http://www.hmso.gov.uk/acts/acts2001/20010010.htm
  22. 22.
  23. 23.
    Takagi, H., Asakawa, C., Itoh, T.: Non-Visual Groupware Client: Notes Reader. In: Proceedings of Center on Disability Technology and Persons with Disabilities Conference, California State University (2000)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Thiessen, P., Chen, C.: Ajax Live Regions: Chat as a Case Example. In: Proceedings of the 2007 International World Wide Web Conference, W4A (2007)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tse, E., Shen, C., Greenberg, S., Forlines, C.: How Pairs Interact Over a Multimodal Digital Table. In: Proceedings, CHI 2007, pp. 216–218. ACM Press, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    U.S. Census Bureau. United States and States: Percent of People 21 to 64 Years Old With a Disability (2007), http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/GRTTableSS?_bm=y&-state=grt&-ds_name=ACS_2007_1YR_G00_&-_box_head_nbr=R1802&-_useSS=Y&-CONTEXT=grt&-mt_name=ACS_2006_EST_G00_R1802_US30&-redoLog=false&-geo_id=01000US&-format=US-30 Google Scholar
  27. 27.
  28. 28.
    Veterbi, A.J.: Error Bounds for convolutional codes and an optimal asymptotically decoding algorithm. IEEE Translations on Information Theory IT-13, 260–269 (1967)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    W3C Roadmap for Accessible Rich Internet Applications. WAI-ARIA Roadmap, http://www.w3.org/TR/aria-roadmap
  30. 30.
    W3C HTML techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0., http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/
  31. 31.
    Watanabe, M., Okano, A., Asano, Y., Ogawa, K.: VoiceBlog: Universally Designed Voice Browser. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 23(1-2), 95–113 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Watters, P., Araujo, A., Hezart, A., Naik, S.: Accessibility Solutions for Visually Impaired Users of Web Discussion Boards. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Information Technology and Applications (2005)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
  34. 34.
  35. 35.
  36. 36.
  37. 37.
  38. 38.
  39. 39.
  40. 40.
    Winberg, F., Bowers, J.: Assembling the Senses: Towards the Design of Cooperative Interfaces for Visually impaired Users. In: Proceedings of CSCW 2004, Chicago, IL, pp. 332–341 (2004)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Woodfine, B.P., Nunes, M.B., Wright, D.J.: Text-based synchronous e-learning and dyslexia: Not necessarily the perfect match! Computers and Education 50(3), 703–717 (2008), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.08.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • John G. Schoeberlein
    • 1
  • Yuanqiong (Kathy) Wang
    • 1
  1. 1.Towson UniversityMarylandUSA

Personalised recommendations