Advertisement

Interactive Accessible Notifications for Emergency Notification Systems

  • Alessio Malizia
  • Teresa Onorati
  • Andrea Bellucci
  • Paloma Diaz
  • Ignacio Aedo
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5616)

Abstract

Notifications are critical when an emergency scenario is going to happen (e.g. a hurricane approaching); so the ability to transmit notifications to different kind of users is a crucial feature for Emergency Management Systems. In this work an ontology was developed by investigating different sources: accessibility guidelines, emergency response systems, communication devices and technologies, taking into account the different abilities of people to react to different alarms (e.g. mobile phone vibration as an alarm for deaf blind people). The knowledge codified in the proposed ontology could be used to enhance and promote the use of non-conventional interfaces for notifying emergency messages thus providing accessibility under different conditions and for different kind of users.

Keywords

Accessibility Eye-tracking Universal Design Non-conventional interfaces Emergency Notification Systems (ENS) 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Malizia, A., Astorga, F., Onorati, T., Diaz, P., Aedo, I.: Emergency Alerts for All: an Ontology based Approach to Improve Accessibility in Emergency Alerting Systems. In: ISCRAM 5th International Conference Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management, vol. 1, pp. 197–207 (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berners-Lee, T.: Disaster Management Ontologies (2007), http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2007Apr/0094.html
  3. 3.
    Vaccari, L., Marchese, M., Giunchiglia, F., McNeill, F., Potter, S., Tate, A.: OpenKnowledge Deliverable 6.5: Emergency response in an open information systems environment (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ziesche, S.: Social-networking web systems: Opportunities for humanitarian information management. Journal of Humanitarian Assistance (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Segev, A.: Adaptive Ontology Use for Crisis Knowledge Representation. In: ISCRAM 5th International Conference Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management, vol. 1, pp. 285–293 (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lam, H.P., Steel, J., Iannella, R.: Using Ontologies for Decision Support in Resource Messaging. In: ISCRAM 5th International Conference Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management, vol. 1, pp. 276–284 (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yesilada, Y.: Annotation and transformation of Web pages to improve mobility for visually impaired users. Ph.D Thesis. School of Computer Science at the University of Manchester, UK (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Masuwa-Morgan, K.R., Burrell, P.: Justification of the need for an ontology for accessibility requirements (Theoretic framework). Interacting with Computers 16(3), 523–555 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Miller, G.A., Beckwith, R., Felbaum, C., Gross, D., Miller, K.: Introduction to WordNet: An On-line Lexical Database. International Journal of Lexicography 3(4), 235–244 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Park, K.S., Lim, C.J.: A Simple Vision-Based Head Tracking Method for Eye Controlled Human/Computer Interface. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies 54, 319–332 (2001)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cleveland, N.R.: Eyegaze Human-Computer Interface for People with Disabilities. In: 1st Conference on Automation Technology and Human Performance (1997), http://www.eyegaze.com/doc/cathuniv.htm

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alessio Malizia
    • 1
  • Teresa Onorati
    • 1
  • Andrea Bellucci
    • 2
  • Paloma Diaz
    • 1
  • Ignacio Aedo
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer Science Dept.Universidad Carlos III de MadridLeganés, MadridSpain
  2. 2.Computer Science Dept.Sapienza Universita’ di RomaRomaItaly

Personalised recommendations