Advertisement

Summary and Outlooks

  • Yee LeungEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Spatial Science book series (ADVSPATIAL)

Abstract

I have discussed from the conceptual, theoretical and empirical points of view the basic issues of knowledge discovery in spatial and temporal data. The kinds of knowledge that geographers are interested in are essentially spatial structures, processes, and relationships in various domains. The data that we are dealing with are voluminous, multi-scaled, multi-sourced, imperfect, and dynamic. Hidden in these complex databases are conceptually and practically meaningful structures, processes and relationships that might be important to the understanding and sustainable development of the human-land system. Our objective is to develop effective and efficient means to discover the potentially useful spatial knowledge that might otherwise lay unnoticed.

From our discussion, a basic task of knowledge discovery in spatial and temporal data involves the unraveling of structures or processes that might appear as natural clusters in data. I have discussed in Chap. 2 the main objectives and difficulties of such task and methods by which natural clusters can be identified. Therefore, clusters form the spatial knowledge hidden in the database in this kind of spatial data mining task. Geographical research often involves classification of spatial phenomena. Given pre-specified spatial classes, we need to discover from data a surface that can separate the classes which are constituents of the data set. Structure thus discovered serves as class separation surface in the general case. Instead of a separation surface, particularly under complicated situations, classes might be separated by a set of classification rules which can be unraveled from data. In Chaps. 3 and 4, a number of statistical and non-statistical methods for the discovery of separation surfaces and classification rules have been, respectively, examined. In the search for spatial relationships hidden in data, the basic issue is to uncover and determine whether or not a spatial association or a spatial casual relationship is local or global. In Chap. 5, I have examined various methods by which local and global spatial statistics can be established from data and the issue of spatial non-stationarity can be resolved. To be able to study the dynamics of spatial phenomena in various time scales, I have discussed the mining of scaling behaviors of spatial processes from data in Chap. 6. The discovery of time varying behaviors from temporal data is investigated on the basis of their self-similarity and long range dependence along a wide spectrum of temporal scales.

Keywords

Knowledge Discovery Data Fusion Spatial Knowledge Concept Lattice Information Fusion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Blum RS (2005) Robust image fusion using a statistical signal processing approach. Inform Fusion 6(2):119–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Burrough PA (1986) Principles of geographic information systems for land resources assessment. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  3. Caron F, Duflos E, Pomorski D, Vanheeghe P (2006) GPS/IMU data fusion using multisensor Kalman filtering: introduction of contextual aspects. Inform Fusion 7(2):221–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Danforth S, Tomlinson C (1988) Type theories and object-oriented programming. Comput Surv 20(1):29–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. David B, Raynal L, Schorter G (1993) GeO2: Why objects in a geographical DBMS? In: Abel D, Ooi BC (eds) Advances in spatial databases: Proceedings of Third International Symposium, SSD'93. Lecture notes in computer Science, vol 692. Springer, Berlin, pp 264–276Google Scholar
  6. Gahegan MN, Roberts SA (1988) An intelligent, object-oriented geographical information system. Int J Geogr Inform Syst 2(2):101–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ganter B, Wille R (1999) Formal concept analysis: mathematical foundations. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  8. Garvey M, Jackson MS, Roberts M (2000) An object-oriented GIS. In: Proceedings of Net. Object Days 2000, 9–12 October 2000, Erfurt, Germany, pp. 604–613Google Scholar
  9. Goodchild MF (1991) Issues of quality and uncertainty. In: Muller JC (ed) Advances in cartography. Elsevier, London, pp 113–139Google Scholar
  10. Goodchild MF (1992a) Geographical data modeling. Comput Geosci 18:401–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Goodchild MF, Gopal S (eds) (1989) Accuracy of spatial databases. Taylor and Francis, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Grégoire E, Konieczny S (2006) Logic-based approaches to information fusion. Inform Fusion 7(1):4–18Google Scholar
  13. Gunther O, Lamerts J (1994) Object-oriented techniques for the management of geographic and environmental data. Comput J 37:16–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Han JW, Nishio S, Kawano H, Wang W (1998) Generalization-based data mining in object-oriented databases using an object cube model. Data Knowl Eng 25:55–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Heuvelink GBM (1998) Error propagation in environmental modelling with GIS. Taylor and Francis, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim W, Garza J, Keskin A (1993) Spatial data management in database systems: research directions. In: Abel D, Ooi BC (eds) Advances in spatial databases: third International Symposium, SSD'93. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 692. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–13Google Scholar
  17. Laferte J-M, Heitz F, Perez P, Fabre E (1995) Hierarchical statistical models for the fusion of multiresolution image data. In: Proceedings of 5th international conference on computer vision, 20–23 June 1995, pp. 908–913Google Scholar
  18. Laurini R, Thompson D (1992) Fundamentals of spatial information systems. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee SC, Bajcsy P (2004) Multisensor raster and vector data fusion based on uncertainty modeling, In: ICIP '04. 2004 international conference on image processing, 5:3355–3358Google Scholar
  20. Lee T, Richards JA, Swain PH (1987) Probabilistic and evidential approaches for multisource data analysis. IEEE Trans Geosci Rem Sens 25(3):283–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Leung Y, Leung KS, He JZ (1999) A generic concept-based object-oriented geographical information system. Int J Geogr Inform Sci 13(5):475–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Leung Y, Ma JH, Goodchild MF (2004b) A general framework for error analysis in measurement-based GIS, Part 1: The basic measurement-error model and related concepts. J Geogr Syst 6:325–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Leung Y, Ma JM, Zhang WX, Qiu GF (2008c) Discovery of hierarchical knowledge structure in geographical information systems – the concept lattice approach (unpublished paper)Google Scholar
  24. Leung Y, Wu WZ, Zhang WX (2006a) Knowledge acquisition in incomplete information systems: a rough set approach. Eur J Oper Res 168:164–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Maguire DJ, Goodchild MF, Rhind D (1991) Geographical information systems: principles and applications, Vol. 1: Principles; Vol.2: Applications. Longman, HarlowGoogle Scholar
  26. Manago M, Kodratoff Y (1991) Induction of decision trees from complex structured data. In: Piatetsky-Shapiro G, Frawley WJ (eds) Knowledge discovery in databases. AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA, pp 289–306Google Scholar
  27. Milne P, Milton S, Smith JL (1993) Geographical object-oriented databases – a case study. Int J Geogr Inform Syst 7:39–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Quattrochi DA, Goodchild MF (eds) (1997) Scale in remote sensing and GIS. CRC Lewis, Boca Raton, FLGoogle Scholar
  29. Rafanelli M, Ferri F, Maceratini R, Sindoni G (1995) An object oriented decision support system for the planning of health resource allocation. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 48(1–2):163–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rottensteiner FJ, Trinder SC, Kubik K (2005) Using the Dempster–Shafer method for the fusion of LIDAR data and multi-spectral images for building detection. Inform Fusion 6(4):283–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sadjadi F (2005) Comparative image fusion analysais, 2nd Joint IEEE International Workshop on Object Tracking and Classification in and Beyond the Visible Spectrum (OTCBVS) Program. San Diego, CA, USA, June 20, 2005 (http://www.cse.ohio-state.edu/OTCBVS/05/OTCBVS-05-FINALPAPERS/W01_13.pdf)Google Scholar
  32. Schistad Solberg AH, Jain AK, Taxt T (1994) Multisource classification of remotely sensed data: fusion of Landsat TM and SARimages. IEEE Trans Geosci Rem Sens 32(4):768–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schistad Solberg AH, Taxt T, Jain AK (1996) A Markov random field model for classification of multisource satellite imagery. IEEE Trans Geosci Rem Sens 34:100–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Simone G, Morabito FC, Farina A (2000) Radar image fusion by multiscale Kalman filtering. FUSION 2000. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on information fusion, 10–13 July 2000, Vol. 2, pp WED3/10 - WED3/17Google Scholar
  35. Tang AY, Adams TM, Usery EL (1996) A spatial data model design for feature-based geographical information systems. Int J Geogr Inform Syst 10:643–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ulfarsson MO, Benediktsson JA, Sveinsson JR (2003) Data fusion and feature extraction in the wavelet domain. Int J Remote Sens 24:3933–3945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Vaughan RA, Antony R, Kirby RP (1988) Geographical information systems and remote sensing for local resource planning. Remote Sensing Products and Publications, DundeeGoogle Scholar
  38. Wille R (1982) Restructuring lattice theory: an approach based on hierarchies of concepts. In: Rival I (ed) Ordered Sets. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp 445–470Google Scholar
  39. Worboys MF (1994) Object-oriented approaches to geo-referenced information. Int J Geogr Inform Syst 8:385–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Worboys MF, Hearnshaw HM, Maguire DJ (1990) Object-oriented data modeling for spatial databases. Int J Geogr Inform Syst 4(4):369–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhang TS, Ramakrishnan R, Livny M (1996) BIRCH: an efficient data clustering method foe very large databases. In: Proceedings of 1996 ACM-SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD’96), pp. 103–114Google Scholar
  42. Zhang Y, Hong G (2005) An IHS and wavelet integrated approach to improve pan-sharpening visual quality of natural colour IKONOS and QuickBird images. Inform Fusion 6(3):225–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dept. of Geography & Resource Management ShatinThe Chinese University of Hong KongNew TerritoriesHong Kong SAR

Personalised recommendations