Flight Searching – A Comparison of Two User-Interface Design Strategies
The most usable user-interface is not necessarily the most popular. For example, the extent to which an interaction is based on graphics can depend highly on convention rather than usability. This study compares contemporary flight search applications in order to investigate whether a more extensive use of graphics can enhance usability. Two user-interfaces are compared: one follows the ideal principles of graphical user-interfaces and direct manipulation, while the second interface requires text to be entered with a keyboard. The results of the comparison indicate that even an early prototype of the graphics based alternative performed better than the typical formula based search application for several measurements of usability.
KeywordsFlight search direct manipulation graphical user interface
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 3.Long, F., Poskitt, H.: Aerlingus.com – A Usability Case Study. In: Proceedings of the Irish Ergonomics Society Annual Conference, pp. 42–47 (2003)Google Scholar
- 5.Petre, M., Green, T.R.G.: Is graphical notation really superior to text, or just different? Some claims by logic designers about graphics in notation. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics, Urbino, Italy, September 3-6 (1990)Google Scholar
- 7.Shneiderman, B.: Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective human-computer interaction. Addison Wesley Longman, Reading (1998)Google Scholar
- 8.Takayama, L., Kandogan, E.: Trust as an underlying factor of system administrator interface choice. In: Extended abstracts of CHI 2006, pp. 1391–1396. ACM Press, New York (2006)Google Scholar