Advertisement

A Comparison of Artifact Reduction Methods for Real-Time Analysis of fNIRS Data

  • Takayuki Nozawa
  • Toshiyuki Kondo
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5618)

Abstract

Due to its convenient, low physical restraint, and electric noise tolerant features, functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) is expected to be a useful tool in monitoring users’ brain activity in HCI. However, fNIRS measurement suffers from various kinds of artifacts, and no standardized method for artifact reduction has been established so far. In this study, we compared high-pass/band-pass filtering, global and local average references, independent component analysis (ICA) based method, and their combinations. Their effectiveness for artifact reduction was evaluated by a cognitive task recognition experiment. The results showed all the methods have artifact reduction capability, but their effectiveness depends on subjects and tasks. This suggests that it can be more practical to try various artifact reduction methods and chose the best one for each task and subject, instead of pursuing a single standardized method.

Keywords

Independent Component Analysis Independent Component Analysis Local Reference Artifact Reduction Independent Component Analysis Algorithm 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Koizumi, H., et al.: Present and Future of Brain Imaging in Mind, Brain and Education. In: IMBES Conference (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tamura, H., et al.: On Physiological Role of Quick Components in Near Infrared Spectroscopy. In: MOBILE 2008 (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Obrig, H., et al.: Spontaneous Low Frequency Oscillations of Cerebral Hemodynamics and Metabolism in Human Adults. NeuroImage 12, 623–639 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Katura, T., et al.: Quantitative evaluation of interrelations between spontaneous low-frequency oscillations in cerebral hemodynamics and systemic cardiovascular dynamics. NeuroImage 31, 1592–1600 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hoshi, Y., Tamura, M.: Detection of dynamic changes in cerebral oxygenation coupled to neuronal function during mental work in man. Neurosci. Lett. 150, 5–8 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Matcher, S.J., et al.: Performance Comparison of Several Published Tissue Near-infrared spectroscopy algorithms. Anal. Biochem. 227, 54–68 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kohno, S., et al.: Removal of the Skin Blood Flow Artifact in Functional Near-infrared Spectroscopic Imaging Data through Independent Component Analysis. Journal of Biomedical Optics 12, 062111–1–9 (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schroeter, M.L., et al.: Towards a Standard Analysis for Functional Near-infrared Imaging. NeuroImage 21, 283–290 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Huppert, T., et al.: A Temporal Comparison of BOLD, ASL, and NIRS Hemodynamic responses to motor stimuli in adult humans. NeuroImage 29, 368–382 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Plichta, M., et al.: Event-Related Functional Near-infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS): Are the Measurements Reliable? NeuroImage 31, 116–124 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Proakis, J., Manolakis, D.: Digital Signal Processing. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bénar, C., et al.: Single-Trial Analysis of Oddball Event-Related Potentials in Simultaneous EEG-fMRI. Human Brain Mapping 28, 602–613 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Matsuda, G., Hiraki, K.: Sustained Decrease in Oxygenated Hemoglobin during Video Games in the Dorsal Prefrontal Cortex: A NIRS Study of Children. NeuroImage 29, 706–711 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ikeda, S., Toyama, K.: Independent Component Analysis for Noisy Data — MEG Data Analysis. Neural Networks 13, 1063–1074 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mantini, D., et al.: Complete Artifact Removal for EEG Recorded during Continuous fMRI Using Independent Component Analysis. NeuroImage 34, 598–607 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cardoso, J.-F., Souloumiac, A.: Blind Beamforming for Non Gaussian Signals. IEEE Proceedings-F 140, 362–370 (1993)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Homan, R.W., Herman, J., Purdy, P.: Cerebral location of international 10-20 system electrode placement. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 66, 376–382 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hsu, C.-W., Lin, C.-J.: A Comparison of Methods for Multiclass Support Vector Machines. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 13, 415–425 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Karatzoglou, A., Meyer, D., Hornik, K.: Support Vector Machines in R. Journal of Statistical Software 16(9) (2006)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Freund, Y., Schapier, R.E.: A Decision-Theoretic Generalization of On-line Learning and an Application to Boosting. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 55, 119–139 (1997)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Takayuki Nozawa
    • 1
  • Toshiyuki Kondo
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Symbiotic Science and TechnologyTokyo University of Agriculture, and TechnologyTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations