How to Learn from Intelligent Products; The Structuring of Incoherent Field Feedback Data in Two Case Studies

  • Renate de Bruin
  • Yuan Lu
  • Aarnout Brombacher
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5617)


A growing number of products - particularly highly innovative and intelligent products - are being returned by customers, while analysis shows that many of these products are in fact functioning according to their technical specifications. Product developers are recognizing the need for information that gives more detail about the reason for these product returns, in order to find the root cause of the problems. Traditionally a lot of information from the field is stored in departments like sales and service (helpdesks and repair centers). Combining these data sources with new field feedback data sources, like customer experiences on the internet and product log files, could provide product developers with more in-depth and accurate information about the actual product performance and the context of use. Case studies were done at two different industries: a company from consumer electronic industry and a company from professional medical system industry. The Maturity Index on Reliability (MIR) method, a method to assess capability for businesses to respond to product reliability related issues, was combined with Contextual Design, a method for user context mapping and requirement definition, and explored as a means to analyze the structure and capability of the current field feedback process in supporting the development of complex and innovative products .


Field Feedback Data Product Failure Root Cause Analysis Business Information Flow MIR Method Contextual Design 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Den Ouden, E.: Development of a Design Analysis Model for Consumer Complaints, Revealing a New Class of Quality Failures. Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Overton, D.: Investigating the mobile No Fault Found Phenomenon. Media Bulletin - White paper. WDSGlobal (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brombacher, A.C., de Graef, M.R.: Anticiperen op trends. In: de Graef, M.R. (ed.) Betrouwbaarheid van technische systemen, anticiperen op trends. Stichting Toekomstbeeld der Techniek, vol. STT64, pp. 392–417. Den Haag (2001) (in Dutch)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pitt, L.F., Berthon, P.R., Watson, R.T., Zinkhan, G.M.: The Internet and the birth of real consumer power. Business Horizons 45(4), 7–14 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Visser, I.M.: Analyzing user perceived failure severity in consumer electronics products. Incorporating the user perspective into the development process. Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lu, Y.: Merging of incoherent field feedback data into prioritized design information. A project proposal for the IOP Integrated Product Creation and Realization. Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Füller, J., Bartl, M., Ernst, H., Mühlbacher, H.: Community Based Innovation: A Method to Utilize the Innovative Potential of Online Communities. In: Proc. Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2004), vol. 7, p. 10. IEEE Computer Society, Washington (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research. Design and Methods. Applied social research method series, vol. 5. Sage Publications, California (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sander, P.C., Brombacher, A.C.: Analysis of quality information flows in the product creation process of high-volume consumer products. International Journal of Production Economics 67(1), 37–52 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sander, P.C., Brombacher, A.C.: MIR: The use of reliability information flows as a maturity index for quality management. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 15(6), 439–447 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brombacher, A.C.: Maturity index on reliability: covering non-technical aspects of IEC61508 reliability certification. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 66(2), 109–120 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Beyer, H.R., Holtzblatt, K.: Contextual design: defining customer-centered systems. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco (1998)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nardi, B.A.: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction. In: Nardi, B.A. (ed.) Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-computer Interaction, pp. 7–16. MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Notess, M.: Using Contextual Design for digital library field studies. In: Proc. ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries workshop. ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries workshop Studying digital library users in the wild: theories, methods, and analytical approaches, Denver, CO, June 10-11 (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Holtzblatt, K.: Contextual Design: Experience in Real Life. In: Oberquelle, H., Krause, R.O.J. (eds.) Proc. Mensch und Computer, vol. 1, pp. 19–22. B.G. Teubner, Stuttgart (2001)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Renate de Bruin
    • 1
  • Yuan Lu
    • 1
  • Aarnout Brombacher
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Industrial Design, Business ProcessEindhoven University of TechnologyEindhovenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations