Skip to main content

Unification in the Description Logic \(\mathcal{EL}\)

  • Conference paper
Rewriting Techniques and Applications (RTA 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 5595))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The Description Logic \(\mathcal{EL}\) has recently drawn considerable attention since, on the one hand, important inference problems such as the subsumption problem are polynomial. On the other hand, \(\mathcal{EL}\) is used to define large biomedical ontologies. Unification in Description Logics has been proposed as a novel inference service that can, for example, be used to detect redundancies in ontologies. The main result of this paper is that unification in \(\mathcal{EL}\) is decidable. More precisely, \(\mathcal{EL}\)-unification is NP-complete, and thus has the same complexity as \(\mathcal{EL}\)-matching. We also show that, w.r.t. the unification type, \(\mathcal{EL}\) is less well-behaved: it is of type zero, which in particular implies that there are unification problems that have no finite complete set of unifiers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baader, F.: Unification in commutative theories. J. of Symbolic Computation 8(5) (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baader, F.: Terminological cycles in KL-ONE-based knowledge representation languages. In: Proc. AAAI 1990 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baader, F.: Terminological cycles in a description logic with existential restrictions. In: Proc. IJCAI 2003 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baader, F., Brandt, S., Lutz, C.: Pushing the \(\mathcal{EL}\) envelope. In: Proc. IJCAI 2005 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P.F. (eds.): The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Baader, F., Küsters, R.: Matching in description logics with existential restrictions. In: Proc. KR 2000 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Baader, F., Küsters, R.: Unification in a description logic with transitive closure of roles. In: Nieuwenhuis, R., Voronkov, A. (eds.) LPAR 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2250, p. 217. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Baader, F., Küsters, R., Borgida, A., McGuinness, D.L.: Matching in description logics. J. of Logic and Computation 9(3) (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Baader, F., Narendran, P.: Unification of concepts terms in description logics. J. of Symbolic Computation 31(3) (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Baader, F., Nutt, W.: Basic description logics. In: [5] (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Baader, F., Sertkaya, B., Turhan, A.-Y.: Computing the least common subsumer w.r.t. a background terminology. J. of Applied Logic 5(3) (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Baader, F., Snyder, W.: Unification theory. In: Handbook of Automated Reasoning, vol. I. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brandt, S.: Polynomial time reasoning in a description logic with existential restrictions, GCI axioms, and—what else. In: Proc. ECAI 2004 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ghilardi, S.: Best solving modal equations. Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 102(3) (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Horrocks, I., Patel-Schneider, P.F., van Harmelen, F.: From SHIQ and RDF to OWL: The making of a web ontology language. Journal of Web Semantics 1(1) (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kazakov, Y., de Nivelle, H.: Subsumption of concepts in \(\mathcal{FL}_0\) for (cyclic) terminologies with respect to descriptive semantics is PSPACE-complete. In: Proc. DL 2003. CEUR Electronic Workshop Proceedings (2003), http://CEUR-WS.org/Vol-81/

  17. Küsters, R.: Non-Standard Inferences in Description Logics. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2100. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Rector, A., Horrocks, I.: Experience building a large, re-usable medical ontology using a description logic with transitivity and concept inclusions. In: Proc. AAAI 1997 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sofronie-Stokkermans, V.: Locality and subsumption testing in \(\mathcal{EL}\) and some of its extensions. In: Proc. AiML 2008 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wolter, F., Zakharyaschev, M.: Undecidability of the unification and admissibility problems for modal and description logics. ACM Trans. Comput. Log. 9(4) (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Baader, F., Morawska, B. (2009). Unification in the Description Logic \(\mathcal{EL}\) . In: Treinen, R. (eds) Rewriting Techniques and Applications. RTA 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5595. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02348-4_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02348-4_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-02347-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-02348-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics