Skip to main content

Active Grading Ensembles for Learning Visual Quality Control from Multiple Humans

  • Conference paper
  • 2478 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 5519))

Abstract

When applying Machine Learning technology to real-world applications, such as visual quality inspection, several practical issues need to be taken care of. One problem is posed by the reality that usually there are multiple human operators doing the inspection, who will inevitable contradict each other occasionally. In this paper a framework is proposed which is able to deal with this issue, based on trained ensembles of classifiers. Most ensemble techniques have however difficulties learning in these circumstances. Therefore several novel enhancements to the Grading ensemble technique are proposed within this framework – called Active Grading. The Active Grading algorithm is evaluated on data obtained from a real-world industrial system for visual quality inspection of the printing of labels on CDs, which was labelled independently by four different human operators and their supervisor, and compared to the standard Grading algorithm and a range of other ensemble (classifier fusion) techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Castillo, E., Alvarez, E.: Expert Systems: Uncertainty and Learning. Springer, New York (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Malamas, E., Petrakis, E., Zervakis, M., Petit, L., Legat, J.D.: A survey on industrial vision systems, applications and tools. Image and Vision Computing 21 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Juran, J., Gryna, F.: Juran’s Quality Control Handbook, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Seewald, A., Fürnkranz, J.: An evaluation of grading classifiers. In: Hoffmann, F., Adams, N., Fisher, D., Guimarães, G., Hand, D.J. (eds.) IDA 2001. LNCS, vol. 2189, pp. 115–124. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Sannen, D., Nuttin, M., Smith, J., Tahir, M.A., Caleb-Solly, P., Lughofer, E., Eitzinger, C.: An on-line interactive self-adaptive image classification framework. In: Gasteratos, A., Vincze, M., Tsotsos, J. (eds.) ICVS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5008, pp. 171–180. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Govindaraju, M., Pennathur, A., Mital, A.: Quality improvement in manufacturing through human performance enhancement. Integrated Manufacturing Systems 12(5) (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Duda, R., Hart, P., Stork, D.: Pattern Classification, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, New York (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Kuncheva, L.: Combining Pattern Classifiers: Methods and Algorithms. Wiley, Chichester (2004)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Polikar, R.: Ensemble based systems in decision making. IEEE Circuits and Systems Magazine 6(3), 21–45 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brown, G., Wyatt, J., Harris, R., Yao, X.: Diversity creation methods: A survey and categorisation. Information Fusion 6(1), 5–20 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Breiman, L., Friedman, J., Olshen, R., Stone, C.: Classification and Regression Trees. Wadsworth International Group, Belmont (1984)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Kuncheva, L., Whitaker, C., Shipp, C., Duin, R.: Limits on the majority vote accuracy in classifier fusion. Pattern Analysis & Applications 6(1), 22–31 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Kittler, J., Hatef, M., Duin, R., Matas, J.: On combining classifiers. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 20(3), 226–239 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cho, S., Kim, J.: Combining multiple neural networks by fuzzy integral for robust classification. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 25(2), 380–384 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kuncheva, L., Bezdek, J., Duin, R.: Decision templates for multiple classifier fusion: An experimental comparison. Pattern Recognition 34(2), 299–314 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Rogova, G.: Combining the results of several neural network classifiers. Neural Networks 7(5), 777–781 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sannen, D., Van Brussel, H., Nuttin, M.: Classifier fusion using Discounted Dempster-Shafer combination. In: Poster Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Machine Learning and Data Mining, pp. 216–230 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sannen, D., Van Brussel, H. (2009). Active Grading Ensembles for Learning Visual Quality Control from Multiple Humans. In: Benediktsson, J.A., Kittler, J., Roli, F. (eds) Multiple Classifier Systems. MCS 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5519. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02326-2_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02326-2_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-02325-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-02326-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics