Skip to main content

Comparison of Perceptual Grouping Criteria within an Integrated Hierarchical Framework

  • Conference paper
Book cover Graph-Based Representations in Pattern Recognition (GbRPR 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 5534))

Abstract

The efficiency of a pyramid segmentation approach mainly depends on the graph selected to encode the information within each pyramid level, on the reduction or decimation scheme used to build one graph from the graph below, and on the criteria employed to define if two adjacent regions are similar or not. This paper evaluates three pairwise comparison functions for perceptual grouping into a generic framework for image perceptual segmentation. This framework integrates the low–level definition of segmentation with a domain–independent perceptual grouping. The performance of the framework using the different comparison functions has been quantitatively evaluated with respect to ground-truth segmentation data using the Berkeley Segmentation Dataset and Benchmark providing satisfactory scores.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Robles-Kelly, A., Hancock, E.R.: An Expectation–maximisation Framework for Segmentation and Grouping. Image and Vision Computing 20, 725–738 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wertheimer, M.: Ǔber Gestaltheorie. Philosophische Zeitschrift für Forschung und Aussprache 1, 30–60 (1925)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Arbeláez, P., Cohen, L.: A Metric Approach to Vector–valued Image Segmentation. Int. Journal of Computer Vision 69, 119–126 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Marfil, R., Molina-Tanco, L., Bandera, A., Rodríguez, J.A., Sandoval, F.: Pyramid Segmentation Algorithms Revisited. Pattern Recognition 39(8), 1430–1451 (2006)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Marfil, R., Molina-Tanco, L., Bandera, A., Sandoval, F.: The Construction of Bounded Irregular Pyramids with a Union–find Decimation Process. In: Escolano, F., Vento, M. (eds.) GbRPR 2007. LNCS, vol. 4538, pp. 307–318. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Haxhimusa, Y., Glantz, R., Kropatsch, W.G.: Constructing Stochastic Pyramids by MIDES - Maximal Independent Directed Edge Set. In: Hancock, E.R., Vento, M. (eds.) GbRPR 2003. LNCS, vol. 2726, pp. 35–46. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Meer, P.: Stochastic Image Pyramids. Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing 45, 269–294 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jolion, J.M.: Stochastic Pyramid Revisited. Pattern Recognition Letters 24(8), 1035–1042 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Haxhimusa, Y., Glantz, R., Saib, M., Langs, G., Kropatsch, W.G.: Logarithmic Tapering Graph Pyramid. In: van Gool, L. (ed.) DAGM 2002. LNCS, vol. 2449, pp. 117–124. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Haxhimusa, Y., Kropatsch, W.: Segmentation Graph Hierarchies. In: Proc. of IAPR Int. Workshop on Syntactical and Structural Pattern Recognition and Statistical Pattern Recognition, pp. 343–351 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Luo, J., Guo, C.: Perceptual Grouping of Segmented Regions in Color Images. Pattern Recognition, 2781–2792 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Huart, J., Bertolino, P.: Similarity–based and Perception–based image segmentation. In: Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Image Processing, pp. 1148–1151 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Martin, D., Fowlkes, C., Malik, J.: Learning to Detect Natural Image Boundaries Using Brightness, Color, and Texture Cues. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis Machine Intell. 26(1), 1–20 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Martin, D., Fowlkes, C., Tal, D., Malik, J.: A Database of Human Segmented Natural Images and its Application to Evaluating Segmentation Algorithms and Measuring Ecological Statistics. In: Int. Conf. Computer Vision (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dollár, P., Tu, Z., Belongie, S.: Supervised Learning of Edges and Object Boundaries. In: Int. Conf. Computer Vision Pattern Recognition (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Maire, M., Arbeláez, P., Fowlkes, C., Malik, J.: Using Contours to Detect and Localize Junctions in Natural Images. In: Int. Conf. Computer Vision Pattern Recognition (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Felzenszwalb, P., McAllester, D.: A Min–cover Approach for Finding Salient Curves. In: POCV 2006 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Marfil, R., Bandera, A. (2009). Comparison of Perceptual Grouping Criteria within an Integrated Hierarchical Framework. In: Torsello, A., Escolano, F., Brun, L. (eds) Graph-Based Representations in Pattern Recognition. GbRPR 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5534. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02124-4_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02124-4_37

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-02123-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-02124-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics