Skip to main content

Proteomics of Embryonic Implantation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Fertility Control

Part of the book series: Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology ((HEP,volume 198))

Abstract

Implantation is a complex process involving an intricate cascade of molecular interactions between the implanting blastocyst and the receptive endometrium. The molecular basis of endometrial receptivity and the mechanisms by which the blastocyst first adheres to the luminal epithelium and then penetrates into the stroma are only just beginning to be resolved. Advances in “omics” technologies, particularly proteomics and metabolomics, are set to have a major impact on the development of this field. In the wake of this information, novel targets for contraceptive intervention may become apparent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baranao RI, Piazza A, Rumi LS, Polak de Fried E (1997) Determination of IL-1 and IL-6 levels in human embryo culture-conditioned media. Am J Reprod Immunol 37:191–194

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beier HM (1974) Oviducal and uterine fluids. J Reprod Fertil 37:221–237

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beier HM, Beier-Hellwig K (1998) Molecular and cellular aspects of endometrial receptivity. Hum Reprod Update 4:448–458

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beier-Hellwig K, Sterzik K, Bonn B, Beier HM (1989) Contribution to the physiology and pathology of endometrial receptivity: the determination of proteins patterns in human uterine secretions. Hum Reprod 4:115–120

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bermúdez MG, Wells D, Malter H, Munné S, Cohen J, Steuerwald NM (2004) Expression profiles of individual human oocytes using microarray technology. Reprod Biomed Online 8:325–337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Classen-Linke I, Alfer J, Krusche CA et al (2000) Progestins, progesterone receptor modulators, and progesterone antagonist change VEGF release of endometrial cells in culture. Steroids 65:763–771

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Desai N, Filipovits J, Goldfarb J (2006) Secretion of soluble HLA-G by day 3 human embryos associated with higher pregnancy and implantation rates: assay of culture media using a new ELISA kit. Reprod Biomed Online 13:272–277

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • DeSouza L, Diehl G, Yang E, Guo J, Rodrigues MJ, Romaschin AD, Colgan TJ, Siu M (2005) Proteomic analysis of the proliferative and secretory phases of the human endometrium: Protein identification and differential protein expression. Proteomics 5:270–281

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dimitriadis E, White CA, Jones R, Salamonsen LA (2005) Cytokines, chemokines and growth factors in endometrium related to implantation. Hum Reprod Update 11:613–630

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dominguez F, Pellicer A, Simon C (2002) Paracrine dialogue in implantation. Mol Cell Endocrinol 186:175–181

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dominguez F, Gadea B, Mercader A, Esteban F, Pellicer A, Simon C (2008) Embryological outcome and secretome profile of implanted blastocyst obtained. Fertil Steril. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.10.019. PMID 19062008

    Google Scholar 

  • Dominguez F, Garrido-Gomez T, Lopez JA, Camafeita E, Quiñonero A, Pellicer A, Simon C (2009) Proteomic analysis of the human receptive versus non-receptive endometrium using differential in-gel electrophoresis and MALDI-MS unveils stathmin I and annexin A2 as diffrentially regulated. Hum Reprod 24:2607–2617

    Google Scholar 

  • Domínguez F, Gadea B, Esteban FJ, Horcajadas JA, Pellicer A, Simón C (2008) Comparative protein-profile analysis of implanted versus non-implanted human blastocyst. Hum Reprod 23:1993–2000

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Donnez J, Van Langendonckt A, Casanas-Roux F, Van Gossum JP et al (2002) Current thinking on the pathogenesis of endometriosis. Gynecol Obstet Invest 54:52–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Finn CL, Martin L (1974) The control of implantation. J Reprod Fertil 39:195–206

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler PA, Tattum J, Bhattacharya S, Klonisch T, Hombach-Klonish S, Gazvani R, Lea RG, Miller I, Simpson WG, Cash P (2007) An investigation of the effects of endometriosis on the proteome of human eutopic endometrium: a heterogeneous tissue with a complex disease. Proteomics 7:130–142

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fuzzi B, Rizzo R, Criscuoli L, Noci I, Melchiorri L, Scarselli B et al (2002) HLA-G expression in early embryos is a fundamental prerequisite for the obtainment of pregnancy. Eur J Immunol 32:311–315

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Giudice LC (1999) Implantation and endometrial function. In: BCJM Fauser (ed) Molecular biology in reproductive medicine. Parthenon Publishing Group, New York, NY, USA, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Giudice LC (1999b) Potencial biochemical markers of uterine receptivity. Hum Reprod 14:3–16

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guerif F, Le Gouge A, Giraudeau B, Poindron J, Bidault R, Gasnier O, Royere D (2007) Limited value of morphological assessment at days 1 and 2 to predict blastocyst development potential: a prospective study based on 4042 embryos. Hum Reprod 22:1973–1981

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herrler A, von Rango U, Bier HM (2003) Embryo-maternal signalling: how the embryo starts talking to its mother to accomplish implantation. Reprod Biomed Online 6:244–256

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Horcajadas JA, Pellicer A, Simón C (2007) Wide genomic analysis of human endometrial receptivity: new times, new opportunities. Hum Reprod Update 13:77–86

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kämmerer U, von Wolff M, Markert UR (2004) Inmunology of human endometrium. Inmunobiology 209:569–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz-Jaffe MG, Gardner DK, Schoolcraft WB (2006a) Proteomic analysis of individual human embryos to identify novel biomarkers of development and viability. Fertil Steril 85:101–107

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Katz-Jaffe MG, Schoolcraft WB, Gardner DK (2006b) Analysis of protein expression (secretome) by human and mouse preimplantation embryos. Fertil Steril 86:678–685

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kitawaki J, Kado N, Ishihara H, Koshiba H et al (2002) Endometriosis: the pathophysiology as an estrogen-dependent disease. Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 83:149–155

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laird SM, Tuckerman EM, Dalton CF (1997) The production of leukaemia inhibitory factor by human endometrium: presence in uterine flushings and production by cells in culture. Hum Reprod 12:569–574

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li TC, Dalton C, Hunjan KS et al (1993a) The correlation of placental protein 14 concentrations in uterine flushings and endometrial morphology in the peri-implantation period. Hum Reprod 8:1923–1927

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li TC, MacKenna A, Roberts R (1993b) The techniques and complications of out-patient uterine washing in the assessment of endometrial function. Hum Reprod 8:343–346

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Licht P, Losch A, Dittrich R et al (1998) Novel insights into human endometrial paracrinology and embryo-maternal communication by intrauterine microdialysis. Hum Reprod Update 4:532–538

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lindhard A, Bentin-Ley U, Ravn V (2002) Biochemical evaluation of endometrial function at the time of implantation. Fertil Steril 78:221–233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maathuis JB, Aitken RJ (1978) Protein patterns of human uterine flushings collected at various stages of the menstrual cycle. J Reprod Fertil 53:343–348

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Makkar G, Ng EH, Yeung WS, Ho PC (2006) Reduced expression of interleukin-11 and interleukin-6 in the peri-implantation endometrium of excessive ovarian responders during in-vitro fertilization treatment. J clin Endocrin Metab 91:3181–3188

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martín J, Dominguez F, Avila S, Castrillo JL, Remohí J, Pellicer A, Simón C (2002) Human endometrial receptivity: gene regulation. J Reprod Immunol 55:131–139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Olivennes F, Ledee-Bataille N, Samama M, Kadoch J, Taupin JL, Dubanchet S et al (2003) Assessment of leukemia inhibitary factor levels by uterine flushing at the time of egg retrieval does not adversely affect pregnancy rates with in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 79:900–904

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sheth KV, Roca GL, al-Sedairy ST, Parhar RS, Hamilton CJ, al-Abdul Jabbar F (1991) Prediction of successful embryo implantation by measuring interleukin-1-alpha and immunosuppressive factor(s) in preimplantation embryo culture fluid. Fertil Steril 55:952–957

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Simon C, Mercader A, Frances A et al (1996) Hormonal regulation of serum and endometrial IL-1α, IL-1β and IL-1ra: IL-1 endometrial microenvironment of the human embryo at the apposition phase under physiological and supraphysiological steroid level conditions. J Reprod Inmunol 31:165–184

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stone BA, Petrucco OM, Seamark RF, Godfrey BM (1986) Concentrations of steroid hormones, and of prolactin, in washings of the human uterus during the menstrual cycle. J Reprod Fertil 78:21–25

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tabibzadeh S, Becker JL, Parsons AK (2003) Endometriosis is associated with alterations in the relative abundance of proteins and IL-10 in the peritoneal fluid. Front Biosci 8:70–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Gaast MH, Beier-Hellwig K, Fauser BC, Beier HM, Macklon NS (2003) Endometrial secretion aspiration prior to embryo transfer does not reduce implantation rates. Reprod Biomed Online 7:105–109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Gaast MH, Classen-Linke I, Krusche CA, Beier-Hellwig K, Fauser BCJM, Beier HM, Macklon NS (2008) Impact of ovarian stimulation on mid-luteal endometrial tissue and secretion markers of receptivity. RBM Online 4:553–563

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Niu Y, Fend J, Guo H, Ye X, Cui H (2006) Use of proteomic analysis of endometriosis to identify different protein expression in patients with endometriosis versus normal controls. Fertil Steril 86:274–282

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Simón .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Garrido-Gómez, T., Dominguez, F., Simón, C. (2010). Proteomics of Embryonic Implantation. In: Habenicht, UF., Aitken, R. (eds) Fertility Control. Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology, vol 198. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02062-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics